Re: Blockerbugs 0.2 Released

2012-10-17 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/17/2012 01:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 properly. Also, if you later supersede the update before it gets
 pushed stable, remember to make sure the new update is also marked
 as fixing the bug. Thanks!
 
ISTR that superseding bugs automatically inherit the list of fixed
bugs from the bugs they supersede - has that changed?

Thanks,

- -- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlB+SosACgkQNd069XiIR3hzYACcCREkpfH+JHP0YTwkeCscOKtl
LaIAnij1RJhzj6AwKuMFf6y4UgqZEldK
=wGx2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Blockerbugs 0.2 Released

2012-10-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:04 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
 On 10/17/2012 01:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
  properly. Also, if you later supersede the update before it gets
  pushed stable, remember to make sure the new update is also marked
  as fixing the bug. Thanks!
  
 ISTR that superseding bugs automatically inherit the list of fixed
 bugs from the bugs they supersede - has that changed?

I'm honestly not sure of the details but I know I've seen cases where
fixes somehow get 'lost' between updates. Obviously if you edit an
existing update there's no problem. If you submit a new one...I really
don't know. It may depend whether it's the same person submitting the
update, what's the 'master package' of the update...I guess Luke would
know for sure.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] Blockerbugs 0.2 Released

2012-10-16 Thread Tim Flink
The next version of QA's blocker tracking app was pushed to production
today. New features include:
 - Blocker/NTH Fix Tracking
 - Test spin tracking
 - Interface re-design
   * With help from the design team and Máirín Duffy in particular
 - Basic stats on blocker/nth bugs
 - Lots of minor fixes

http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/

For testers:
 - There is always an up-to-date list (synced every 30 minutes)
   of blocker and nth fixing updates that need to be tested

For developers:
 - Since blocker and nth fixes are now being tracked like the bugs are,
   updates with blocker/nth fixes should get more attention
 - If you do have a blocker/nth fix, please mark it as such in bodhi or
   it won't be noticed by the new app.

If you notice bugs or have suggestions on how the app could be
improved, please file an issue in the qa trac:
 - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/

Thanks,

Tim


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Blockerbugs 0.2 Released

2012-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 07:51 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:

 For developers:
  - Since blocker and nth fixes are now being tracked like the bugs are,
updates with blocker/nth fixes should get more attention
  - If you do have a blocker/nth fix, please mark it as such in bodhi or
it won't be noticed by the new app.

Just wanted to amplify this a bit as it's very important, not just for
this webapp but for the blocker bug process in general: when you fix
blocker or NTH bugs, please ensure the update that fixes the bug is
marked as fixing it in Bodhi (when you submit an update to Bodhi,
there's a field for entering the bug #s of bugs that it fixes). We need
the Bodhi/Bugzilla integration to be sure we're tracking blocker fixes
properly. Also, if you later supersede the update before it gets pushed
stable, remember to make sure the new update is also marked as fixing
the bug. Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel