fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc.

It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation
Live etc), and even WS Live respins (support for spins coming later).

You can try it now from <
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/fedora-img-dl/>.

Feedback is welcome.

Jens


ps I am not entirely in love with the name, so if you have suggestions for
a better one, let me know - note it may also be extended to more OSes in
the future perhaps.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 15. 04. 19 v 13:30 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> rubygem-capybara  mmorsi, orphan, ruby-    0
> weeks ago
>   packagers-sig
> rubygem-childprocess  ggillies, mmorsi, orphan,    0
> weeks ago
>   tdawson
> rubygem-rubyzip   mmorsi, orphan   0
> weeks ago
> rubygem-selenium-webdriver    mmorsi, orphan   0
> weeks ago
> rubygem-vcr   mmorsi, orphan, tdawson  0
> weeks ago
>

I'm going to takeover the above:


https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8284


Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

[Mario Torre]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:11 AM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:55:12PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:50 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> > domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear developers,
> > >
> >
> > Hello, Dominik ;)
> >
> > sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but I've noticed that a significant
> > > number of posters is sending HTML e-mail to this list (not to mention
> > > top-replying), which generates unnecessary network traffic. Some people
> > > pay for every bit downloaded, so they're paying for the same information
> > > twice, because the e-mails are sent with multipart/alternative format,
> > > which contains BOTH text/plain and text/html. One thing I noticed those
> > > senders have in common is that they use Gmail.
> > >
> > > So, a plea to Gmail users: please stop sending HTML e-mail to Fedora
> > > mailing lists.
> > >
> >
> > I'm sending you this HTML email because Google dropped possibility to send
> > plaintext emails. Sorry =(

It seems to randomly change the settings over time, however there's a
way to do so, in the bottom corner of the reply textfield, next to
trash icon, there's a menu. If you click on that you will have access
to the "plain text mode" option.

> At least it's sending a proper text/plain alternative.
>
> I've seen far worse, such as corporate mail systems that send a snotty
> message along the lines of "install an HTML-capable email reader" as
> the text alternative.  Clue for those developers: If your software is
> too stupid to create a text alternative, don't send one at all.

Well, yeah, but some people don't really have a choice and it would be
unfair to ask them not to contribute because we don't like HTML
mailers (which is a problem, I agree, but shouldn't be
discriminatory).


Cheers,
Mario


-- 
Mario Torre
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat GmbH 
9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora flatpak remote is not GPG verified

[Michal Konecny]

Hi,

I recently started using Fedora flatpak remote in Fedora 30 Silverblue, 
but now I'm facing issue with GPG verification.
I didn't had any issue when installing the application from the remote 
few days ago, but when I'm trying to do `flatpak update` I'm getting 
"Error: Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote"


Why the flatpak remote is not GPG signed? Or is there another issue?

Regards,
mkonecny
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaned packages need new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.

Grep the list for your FAS name, follow the transitive deps:
   https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-04-15.txt

Request package ownership via releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issues

Packages retired today are still listed in this report: xcdroast
Packages retired earlier but still listed in this report: SimplyHTML


Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

PyMca orphan   2 weeks ago
Ray   orphan   2 weeks ago
SimplyHTMLmizdebsk, orphan 9 weeks ago
aeskulap  orphan   0 weeks ago
ahkab orphan   1 weeks ago
arc-theme besser82, dbenoit, orphan1 weeks ago
astyleorphan   0 weeks ago
cmusphinx3jjames, orphan   6 weeks ago
codeblocksorphan, sharkcz  0 weeks ago
cwiid orphan   2 weeks ago
dvdbackup cicku, orphan0 weeks ago
emacs-pymacs  orphan   0 weeks ago
gnome-dvb-daemon  orphan   0 weeks ago
gnome-shell-extension-orphan   0 weeks ago
openweather
gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd   orphan   0 weeks ago
gnue-common   orphan   2 weeks ago
jam-control   orphan   2 weeks ago
ktechlab  chitlesh, orphan 1 weeks ago
lightdm-gtk   cwickert, dbenoit, orphan,   1 weeks ago
  rdieter
linsmith  chitlesh, orphan 1 weeks ago
nodejs-after  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-alter  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ansi-font  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ansidiff   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-archiver   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-archiver-utils nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ast-traverse   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ast-types  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-astral nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-astral-angular-annotatenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-astral-passnodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-async-cachenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-async-each nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-aws-sign2  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-base64-js  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-basic-auth-parser  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-bl nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-bluebird   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-breakable  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-camel-case nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-caniuse-db nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-change-casenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-clean-css  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-clone  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-clsnodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-co nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-commoner   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-compress-commons   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-console-browserify nodejs-sig, orphan 

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Adopt new Go Packaging Guidelines

[Jakub Cajka]

- Original Message -
> From: "Ben Cotton" 
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related 
> to Fedora"
> 
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 10:11:51 PM
> Subject: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Adopt new Go Packaging 
> Guidelines
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopt_new_Go_Packaging_Guidelines
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> The [[PackagingDrafts/Go| current Go packaging guidelines]] have been in a
> draft
> state for several years now, and they do not reflect the
> [[ More_Go_packaging|current practices ]] from the Go SIG. As a result of new
> RPM macros developed by [[User:nim| Nicolas Mailhot]], the Go SIG wishes to
> formally adopt new Go Packaging Guidelines, which aim at automation,
> reliability
> and simplicity.
> 
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:eclipseo| Robert-André Mauchin]]
> * Name: [[User:jcajka| Jakub Cajka]]

Hello, as much as this change proposal excites me and I'm looking forward to 
it. I'm unfortunately currently not able to own this change, regardless as much 
I would really like to. 

I would also like to note that I have been added as owner arbitrarily, without 
notice and without my consent and therefore I would like to be removed from the 
owner list.

Thanks.


> * Name: [[User:nim| Nicolas Mailhot]]
> * Name: [[User:qulogic| Elliott Sales de Andrade]]
> 
> * Email: 
> 
> 
> == Detailed Description ==
> 
> Over 775 Go packages are currently residing in Fedora's repositories, yet no
> formal guidelines have ever been approved. As a result, the various Go SPECs
> are
> inconsistent and most often outdated. Moreover, the next version of Go, 1.13,
> will introduce the concept of modules by default, which will completely
> change
> how Go libraries are distributed. With the current state of our tooling, the
> Go
> SIG is not prepared to face such a drastic change.
> 
> [[User:nim| Nicolas Mailhot]] has worked on a set of new RPM macros which
> will allow us to disconnect the upstream Go tooling from the downstream
> integration inside RPM. This will allow us to adapt easily to future upstream
> changes without the need to rewrite our SPEC catalogue.
> 
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> 
> * Simplicity: SPEC files are simpler, less error-prone
> * Automation: the new macros computes packages definition, Requires,
> Provides and has provision for the new automated BuildRequires
> * Standardization of SPEC files across the Go library
> * Drastic reduction of boilerplate and SPEC size
> * Automatic removal of vendored code
> * Ease of testing: all units tests are detected and run
> * Ease of upkeep
> * Ease of adaptation to upstream changes
> 
> == Scope ==
> 
> * Proposal owners:
> ** [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/51
> Get the last macros approved in ''redhat-rpm-config'']
> ** Get ''[https://pagure.io/golist golist]'', the tool detecting
> dependencies, updated and split from the
> ''[https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-compilers/ go-compilers]''
> package
> ** Release ''GOPATH'' directory ownership from the
> ''[https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang golang]'' package, so it
> can be  managed by the ''[https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros
> go-rpm-macros]'' package
> ** Get ''[https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros go-rpm-macros]'' packaged and
> reviewed
> ** Retire ''[https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-srpm-macros
> go-srpm-macros]'' and
> ''[https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-compilers/ go-compilers]''
> ** Port existing Go packages to the new macros (it probably won't be
> finished by [[Releases/31 | Fedora 31]])
> 
> * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
> 

I believe this affects all packagers maintaining Go based packages as they 
should update their packages up to the new standard, so we don't fragment the 
package base. So IMO this should be system wide change.

JC

> 
> * Policies and guidelines:
> [https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/883 Get the Go
> packaging guidelines approved by the Packaging Committee]
> 
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> 
> No compatibility impact is expected. All the new macros are backward
> compatible
> with the old ones.
> 
> == How To Test ==
> 
> The COPR [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/macros-ng/
> nim/macros-ng]
> can be used to test the new macros on Rawhide. Sample SPEC files are
> available
> in the FPC Guidelines proposal.
> 
> == User Experience ==
> 
> The user impact is minimal or nil. As a result of the simplification of SPEC
> files, we may ship updated libraries more quickly, and it may be easier for
> new
> contributors to package Go applications.
> 
> == Dependencies ==
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
> 
> == Contingency Plan ==
> 
> * Contingency mechanism: If the required packages are not merged by
> the deadline target, or if the Guidelines are not approved, we may
> continue with our current set of non-approved practices. No other
> impact is expected.
> * Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System 

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:55:12PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:50 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> 
> > Dear developers,
> >
> 
> Hello, Dominik ;)
> 
> sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but I've noticed that a significant
> > number of posters is sending HTML e-mail to this list (not to mention
> > top-replying), which generates unnecessary network traffic. Some people
> > pay for every bit downloaded, so they're paying for the same information
> > twice, because the e-mails are sent with multipart/alternative format,
> > which contains BOTH text/plain and text/html. One thing I noticed those
> > senders have in common is that they use Gmail.
> >
> > So, a plea to Gmail users: please stop sending HTML e-mail to Fedora
> > mailing lists.
> >
> 
> I'm sending you this HTML email because Google dropped possibility to send
> plaintext emails. Sorry =(

At least it's sending a proper text/plain alternative.

I've seen far worse, such as corporate mail systems that send a snotty
message along the lines of "install an HTML-capable email reader" as
the text alternative.  Clue for those developers: If your software is
too stupid to create a text alternative, don't send one at all.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

[Lennart Poettering]

On Sa, 13.04.19 14:03, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:

> > If you enable lingering for a user, it's the "systemd --user" instance
> > (i.e. the per-user service manager) that is started at boot and
> > terminated at shutdown (instead of started at first login and
> > terminated at last logout of the user), that's all.
> >
> > If you then run code as user service (i.e. as a service started and
> > managed by the "systemd --user" instance instead of PID 1) then it is
> > lifecycled (and its processes killed as needed) by the user service
> > manager. And you can configure the way you want killing to behave like
> > you would for any systemd service: with KillMode= in the unit file.
>
> This doesn't really fit with the security requirements we need.
> Anything run outside of a user session needs to have an audit session id
> and login uid assigned to anything run.

It has. As mentioned, systemd --user runs as part of a PAM session,
hence it acquire its own session ID and loginuid setting as part of that.

> We also need to have the ability to know the name of the script that
> is being run in an audit event.

To my knowledge audit collects the comm name of any process already, no?

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

[Michal Konecny]

Will this be used by Fedora Media Writer [0]?

[0] - 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/


On 4/15/19 11:22 AM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:

Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc.

It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg 
Workstation Live etc), and even WS Live respins (support for spins 
coming later).


You can try it now from 
.


Feedback is welcome.

Jens


ps I am not entirely in love with the name, so if you have suggestions 
for a better one, let me know - note it may also be extended to more 
OSes in the future perhaps.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

[Dan Čermák]

Hi Jens,

cool project! I see a certain overlap with fedora-mediawriter though, as
that one can download ISOs too.

I've skimmed the sources (is this upstream:
https://github.com/juhp/fedora-img-dl?) to take a look whether you
verify the GPG signatures of the downloaded images, but couldn't find
anything like that (although I can barely read Haskell). If your tool
would do that, I'd consider that a killer feature.


Cheers,

Dan

Jens-Ulrik Petersen  writes:

> Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc.
>
> It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation
> Live etc), and even WS Live respins (support for spins coming later).
>
> You can try it now from <
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/fedora-img-dl/>.
>
> Feedback is welcome.
>
> Jens
>
>
> ps I am not entirely in love with the name, so if you have suggestions for
> a better one, let me know - note it may also be extended to more OSes in
> the future perhaps.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

[Jonathan Dieter]

On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 16:01 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 21:06, Todd Zullinger  wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If devtoolset is available for EPEL6 (which I think it is?)
> > 
> > I don't believe devtoolset was enabled for el6 in koji.
> > When it was added to the mock configs for el6/el7, the
> > consensus on the epel list was that it would be added to el6
> > if there was sufficient demand.  I've only seen it come up
> > once (or maybe twice) since then on the epel list.
> > 
> > I'm not familiar enough with the koji commands to confirm
> > it.  I can see that rhel7-server-rhscl-7 is listed in the
> > external repos, but I don't see a similar rhel6 SCL.
> > 
> > Apologies if I simply missed an announcement on the epel
> > lists and am passing on outdated data.
> > 
> 
> I believe Todd is correct. At the time there was the package needing
> SCL's was chromium and the owner had no interest for making the
> package in EL6. If zchunk needs it, we can put it in.

That's ok.  I've gone with Kevin Kofler's suggestion and just fixed the
build to work with the old version of GCC.

Thanks, all, for the help!

Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

[Dan Horák]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:30:27 +0200
Miro Hrončok  wrote:

astyleorphan   0 weeks ago
codeblocksorphan, sharkcz  0 weeks ago

I'll take over these - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8283


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning rubygem-codemirror-rails

[Pavel Valena]

As it is no longer maintained for 2+ years upstream(test suite lacks support 
for 5.2) and I have no use for it.

-- 
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 4/14/19 4:11 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 4:04 PM Jonathan Dieter  wrote:
>>
>> So, the background is that I'd like to build zchunk for EPEL 6 (it's
>> already built for EPEL 7).  Unfortunately, the gcc in EL6 is too old to
>> build zchunk, so I'd prefer to use a newer version from an SCL, rather
>> than rewrite zchunk to be compatible with an ancient version of gcc.
>>
>> I noticed that SCLs are available for EPEL 7 (note the final repository
>> in the list at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=259),
>> but not for EPEL 6 (see
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=140).
> 
> The SCL's have their uses, but for EPEL? I think they'd add
> unnecessary complexity on an an unreliable developer codebase and be a
> really bad idea to rely on for EPEL componenents. RHEL 6 is at release
> 6.10, and should be treated as end-of-life. If the component were
> being embedded into the SCL, then it might make some sense to support.
> But as best I can tell zchunk has nothing to do with the SCL except
> for the gcc requirement.

Just to clarify: When we added devtoolset scl to epel7, the rule was
that it was only to be used for build time, never runtime.

I don't see a big problem doing the same for rhel6, but there hasn't
been any demand for it yet.

If it's strictly build time, I don't see that users would see any
complications from it.

kevin




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 3/19/19 11:01 AM, Stelian Iancu wrote:

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Emmanuel Seyman  wrote:


* Sérgio Basto [19/03/2019 00:03] :


I though it was just one person which decide orphan his 259 packages


Mikolaj is the last actif member of the Java SIG.


And who is guilty for this?


I think the bigger question here is what is going to happen with the Java SIG?

In general, what is the situation of Java in Fedora?
I regret having to say this, but I think it's inevitable: Due to the 
Java-"modularization" activities, Java in Fedora is going to be a matter 
of the past, soon.


Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 13:23, Chris Murphy  wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:49 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>  wrote:
> >
> > Dear developers,
> > sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but I've noticed that a significant
> > number of posters is sending HTML e-mail to this list (not to mention
> > top-replying), which generates unnecessary network traffic. Some people
> > pay for every bit downloaded, so they're paying for the same information
> > twice, because the e-mails are sent with multipart/alternative format,
> > which contains BOTH text/plain and text/html. One thing I noticed those
> > senders have in common is that they use Gmail.
>
> The place to fix this is at the listserver. Either bounce HTML emails
> like kernel.org does, or strip the HTML. I support the latter but not
> the former. It severely limits my participation to have emails bounce.
>
>
As for the top and bottom post thing, I agree top posting is annoying
> but again, that ship has sailed on mobile. There's no going back, and
> I wish this whole debate would just die by us giving up and going with
> top posting as the preferred way.
>
>
It just means the conversation shifts for when someone posts in context
that they are not following the social path.. you then end up with long
diatribes about how in-context breaks X,Y,Z things that top-posting people
require. In the end, it is mostly about social filtering... there are those
who follow 'a convention' and those who do not. We are filtering our
in-house people versus our unclean just like any other org.


>
> --
> Chris Murphy
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

[Andrew Lutomirski]

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:33 PM Jerry James  wrote:

> Hi Antonio,
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:26 PM Antonio Trande 
> wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Updates of coin-or-Sample/CoinUtils/Ipopt packages are coming on
> > Rawhide; involved packages:
>
> I didn't know you were working on this.  I noticed a week or so ago that
> several of the coin-or packages have FTBFS bugs filed against them, so I
> started working on fixing and updating all of them.  I had to stop due to a
> trip out of town, but I got through about 4/5 of the coin-or packages, with
> various improvements.  Are you interested in seeing what I've got, or would
> you rather just go ahead with what you've already done?  Here is a summary
> of what I've done so far, in the approximate order in which the packages
> would have to be built.
>
>- coin-or-Data-miplib3: new package (
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693913)
>- coin-or-Data-Netlib: new package (
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693514)
>- coin-or-Ipopt: update to 3.12.12, correct license to "EPL-1.0", drop
>unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Sample: update to 1.2.11, drop unnecessary pkgconfig R
>- coin-or-CoinUtils: update to 2.11.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0",
>change URL to github, add a patch to prevent a segfault when a problem's
>status has not been set (need to send that upstream), kill rpath
>- coin-or-Osi: update to 0.108.3, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change
>URL to github, add patch to build with glpk >= 4.48 (see
>https://github.com/coin-or/Osi/pull/121), kill rpath, drop unnecessary
>BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Clp: update to 1.17.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change
>URL to github, add bootstrap conditional due to circular build dependencies
>with Cbc, build with MUMPS and suitesparse support, build with Cbc and
>nauty support on the non-bootstrap build, add patch to fix a bad static
>cast, add patch to fix a crash in coin-or-lemon, add patch to fix a bad
>parameter when building with Cbc support
>- coin-or-DyLP: update to 1.10.4, correct license to "EPL-1.0",
>install and set the path to the error text message file, kill rpath, drop
>unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Vol: update to 1.5.4, correct license to "EPL-1.0", kill
>rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Cgl: update to 0.60.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change
>URL to github, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Cbc: update to 2.10.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change
>URL to github, add patch to fix failure to link with glpk, build with nauty
>support, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-SYMPHONY: update to 5.6.17, correct license to "EPL-1.0",
>change URL to github, provide the PDF manual, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Alps: update to 1.5.7, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change
>URL to github, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Bcp: update to 1.4.4, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-CoinMP: update to 1.8.4, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs
>and Rs
>- coin-or-FlopC++: update to 1.2.5, correct license to "EPL-1.0",
>update URL, add -doc subpackage with doxygen output, kill rpath, drop
>unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-lemon: add patch to fix template problem (causes FTBFS), add
>patch to fix test failures due to references to temporary objects that go
>out of scope, fix the cmake file to refer to a shared library, kill rpath
>- coin-or-Bcps: correct license to "EPL-1.0", change URL to github,
>kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>- coin-or-Blis: update to 0.94.8, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change
>URL to github, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs
>
> That's as far as I've gotten.  I haven't looked at coin-or-Bonmin,
> coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, or coin-or-OS yet.  Let me know if you would
> like to see all these changes first, or proceed with what you have planned
> first.
>
>
Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon?  I packaged it
because I thought I was going to use it, but I ended up not using it.

--Andy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

[Antonio Trande]

On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote
> Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon?  I packaged
> it because I thought I was going to use it, but I ended up not using it.
> 
> --Andy
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

Add me, please.
My FAS: sagitter

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 13:22, Ralf Corsepius  wrote:

> On 3/19/19 11:01 AM, Stelian Iancu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Emmanuel Seyman 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Sérgio Basto [19/03/2019 00:03] :
> >>>
> >>> I though it was just one person which decide orphan his 259 packages
> >>
> >> Mikolaj is the last actif member of the Java SIG.
>
> And who is guilty for this?
>
>
One of the reasons that there was a Java SIG long ago was that Java
packaging was an ugly sewage pile of software. Java had its own way of
doing things which didn't match how Fedora wanted things packaged.. and it
took a LOT of work to unbundle, unhook, and clean up. Over time, the number
of people who a) want to work on that and b) get the constant 'oooh yuck
its java.. why would anyone work on that?' took its toll and people left.

The same thing is happening in most other SIG's.. it is thankless work
especially when people are always good about telling how it should have
been done instead. The number of people active in them gets smaller over
time with everyone else thinking 'oh I don't need to worry about it there
is a SIG to take care of this.. when it turns out that it really is just 1
person still showing up.'



> > I think the bigger question here is what is going to happen with the
> Java SIG?
> >
> > In general, what is the situation of Java in Fedora?
> I regret having to say this, but I think it's inevitable: Due to the
> Java-"modularization" activities, Java in Fedora is going to be a matter
> of the past, soon.
>
>
Modularization is more like the dust particle hitting hyper saturated
solution. You are getting large amounts of participate falling out.. but
the 'problem' was there before just hidden in plain site.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2nJybaKOP0



> Ralf
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

[Aleksandar Kurtakov]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:06 PM Stephen John Smoogen 
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 13:22, Ralf Corsepius  wrote:
>
>> On 3/19/19 11:01 AM, Stelian Iancu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Emmanuel Seyman 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> * Sérgio Basto [19/03/2019 00:03] :
>> >>>
>> >>> I though it was just one person which decide orphan his 259 packages
>> >>
>> >> Mikolaj is the last actif member of the Java SIG.
>>
>> And who is guilty for this?
>>
>
Looking for guilty person/people is always the wrong thing to do! And it's
never people that do work - no matter how less it is!


>>
> One of the reasons that there was a Java SIG long ago was that Java
> packaging was an ugly sewage pile of software. Java had its own way of
> doing things which didn't match how Fedora wanted things packaged.. and it
> took a LOT of work to unbundle, unhook, and clean up. Over time, the number
> of people who a) want to work on that and b) get the constant 'oooh yuck
> its java.. why would anyone work on that?' took its toll and people left.
>

I would dare to say that a number of us (Java SIG creators) moved to work
upstream to get to the state where Java projects are no longer these
impossible to build not even dare to package properly things . Additionally
Flatpak seems way better for any GUI app compared to creating RPMs which
additionally reduces the work spent on RPM side. No mattter whether people
like or not but containerization eats the RPM workforce - both for server
and workstation.



>
> The same thing is happening in most other SIG's.. it is thankless work
> especially when people are always good about telling how it should have
> been done instead. The number of people active in them gets smaller over
> time with everyone else thinking 'oh I don't need to worry about it there
> is a SIG to take care of this.. when it turns out that it really is just 1
> person still showing up.'
>
>
>
>> > I think the bigger question here is what is going to happen with the
>> Java SIG?
>> >
>> > In general, what is the situation of Java in Fedora?
>> I regret having to say this, but I think it's inevitable: Due to the
>> Java-"modularization" activities, Java in Fedora is going to be a matter
>> of the past, soon.
>>
>>
> Modularization is more like the dust particle hitting hyper saturated
> solution. You are getting large amounts of participate falling out.. but
> the 'problem' was there before just hidden in plain site.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2nJybaKOP0
>
>
>
>> Ralf
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

[Christopher]

If nobody picks up the ones by my name (nodejs-path-exists,
nodejs-bluebird, nodejs-grunt-known-options), then I will probably
have to orphan js-jquery, because it probably needs those for its
build (I can't think of any other reason my name would be listed next
to those).

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:31 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package 
> or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.
>
> Grep the list for your FAS name, follow the transitive deps:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-04-15.txt
>
> Request package ownership via releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issues
>
> Packages retired today are still listed in this report: xcdroast
> Packages retired earlier but still listed in this report: SimplyHTML
>
>
>  Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
> PyMca orphan   2 weeks ago
> Ray   orphan   2 weeks ago
> SimplyHTMLmizdebsk, orphan 9 weeks ago
> aeskulap  orphan   0 weeks ago
> ahkab orphan   1 weeks ago
> arc-theme besser82, dbenoit, orphan1 weeks ago
> astyleorphan   0 weeks ago
> cmusphinx3jjames, orphan   6 weeks ago
> codeblocksorphan, sharkcz  0 weeks ago
> cwiid orphan   2 weeks ago
> dvdbackup cicku, orphan0 weeks ago
> emacs-pymacs  orphan   0 weeks ago
> gnome-dvb-daemon  orphan   0 weeks ago
> gnome-shell-extension-orphan   0 weeks ago
> openweather
> gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd   orphan   0 weeks ago
> gnue-common   orphan   2 weeks ago
> jam-control   orphan   2 weeks ago
> ktechlab  chitlesh, orphan 1 weeks ago
> lightdm-gtk   cwickert, dbenoit, orphan,   1 weeks ago
>rdieter
> linsmith  chitlesh, orphan 1 weeks ago
> nodejs-after  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-alter  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-ansi-font  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-ansidiff   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-archiver   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-archiver-utils nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-ast-traverse   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-ast-types  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-astral nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-astral-angular-annotatenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-astral-passnodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-async-cachenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-async-each nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-aws-sign2  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-base64-js  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-basic-auth-parser  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-bl nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-bluebird   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-breakable  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-camel-case nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-caniuse-db nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-change-casenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
> nodejs-clean-css  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks 

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc.
> 
> It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation
> Live etc), and even WS Live respins (support for spins coming later).
> 
> You can try it now from <
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/fedora-img-dl/>;.
> 
> Feedback is welcome.

I already basically wrote this:

https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind

it has a lot more capabilities, and is used quite heavily in various
tools and processes the QA team uses.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

[Chris Murphy]

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:49 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
 wrote:
>
> Dear developers,
> sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but I've noticed that a significant
> number of posters is sending HTML e-mail to this list (not to mention
> top-replying), which generates unnecessary network traffic. Some people
> pay for every bit downloaded, so they're paying for the same information
> twice, because the e-mails are sent with multipart/alternative format,
> which contains BOTH text/plain and text/html. One thing I noticed those
> senders have in common is that they use Gmail.

The place to fix this is at the listserver. Either bounce HTML emails
like kernel.org does, or strip the HTML. I support the latter but not
the former. It severely limits my participation to have emails bounce.

As for the top and bottom post thing, I agree top posting is annoying
but again, that ship has sailed on mobile. There's no going back, and
I wish this whole debate would just die by us giving up and going with
top posting as the preferred way.


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 4/15/19 2:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 12:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 4/14/19 10:41 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> On 15. 04. 19 3:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
 MongoDB has been removed from Fedora:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MongoDB_Removal
>>>
>>> Except it was not:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677379
>>
>> It should now be blocked in f30 as well (it was blocked in f31)
>> and I made a update for fedora-package-obsoletes to obsolete it.
>> (Of course that needs to go stable)
> 
> Can you mark the update as being associated with the bug? That needs to
> be done for it to get pulled into the normal blocker / FE request
> process. Thanks!

Well, fedora-obsolete-packages requires a bug, so I filed:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700073

for the update. I thought we didn't want to use "change" bugs as
blockers/exceptions? (since they would get closed before they perhaps
should be?).

I can add the change bug if you like tho... or we could transfer the FE
to the other bug?

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 14:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 4/15/19 2:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 12:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On 4/14/19 10:41 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > On 15. 04. 19 3:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > MongoDB has been removed from Fedora:
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MongoDB_Removal
> > > > 
> > > > Except it was not:
> > > > 
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677379
> > > 
> > > It should now be blocked in f30 as well (it was blocked in f31)
> > > and I made a update for fedora-package-obsoletes to obsolete it.
> > > (Of course that needs to go stable)
> > 
> > Can you mark the update as being associated with the bug? That needs to
> > be done for it to get pulled into the normal blocker / FE request
> > process. Thanks!
> 
> Well, fedora-obsolete-packages requires a bug, so I filed:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700073
> 
> for the update. I thought we didn't want to use "change" bugs as
> blockers/exceptions? (since they would get closed before they perhaps
> should be?).

Oh, yes, good point.

> I can add the change bug if you like tho... or we could transfer the FE
> to the other bug?

Yeah, let's do that.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 4/14/19 10:41 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 04. 19 3:27, Neal Gompa wrote:

>> MongoDB has been removed from Fedora:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MongoDB_Removal
> 
> Except it was not:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677379

It should now be blocked in f30 as well (it was blocked in f31)
and I made a update for fedora-package-obsoletes to obsolete it.
(Of course that needs to go stable)

kevin




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 12:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 4/14/19 10:41 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 04. 19 3:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > MongoDB has been removed from Fedora:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MongoDB_Removal
> > 
> > Except it was not:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677379
> 
> It should now be blocked in f30 as well (it was blocked in f31)
> and I made a update for fedora-package-obsoletes to obsolete it.
> (Of course that needs to go stable)

Can you mark the update as being associated with the bug? That needs to
be done for it to get pulled into the normal blocker / FE request
process. Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

[Mat Booth]

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 00:29, Robert-André Mauchin 
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In Golang, we have a lot of cyclic dependencies for which we have to
bootstrap
> many packages, and then later build them unbootstrapped when all the deps
are
> in place.
> How are we supposed to handle this in Modularity? Since it rebuilds all
> packages from the start, it will fail to build cyclic deps. Is there a
way to
> turn on the --with bootstrap switch in Modularity? Are we supposed to
build
> the package two times, one with bootstrap, and later without?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André

Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify
rpm macros.

Here is the documentation:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modules/#_build_macros_optional

Here is an example where I needed to set --with bootstrap in my module:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d638a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76



--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Sphinx and xindy

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:04 PM Jerry James  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:57 AM Jerry James  wrote:
> > So clisp has been built for all architectures in Rawhide now.  I
> > cannot build it for F30 yet, because the version of gcc with the s390x
> > fix has not yet been submitted as an update.  Regardless, can somebody
> > who knows how to build xindy try it in Rawhide and let me know if
> > there are problems doing so?  Or give me instructions on how to build
> > it myself?  Thanks,
>
> Somebody out there has been involved with past attempts to build
> xindy.  Please, I would like to make progress on this so I can get
> back to building the coq stack's new versions.  Which package used to
> contain xindy?  How does one attempt to build it?  I would like to see
> if there are still build issues with the new clisp.

Anybody?  Anybody?  Bueller?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

What is a PDC branch?

[Jerry James]

I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago.  However, my
requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch
already exists".  I reopened the tickets with a request for more
information, but they just got closed again with the same message,
which tells me that humans are not reading these, so there's no point
in opening them again.  Here are the relevant tickets:

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10798
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10799
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10800
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10801

Could somebody please (a) tell me what on earth that means, and (b)
fix whatever generates that error message so that it says something
intelligible to us mere mortals?

Thank you,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 30 compose report: 20190415.n.2 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-30-20190413.n.1
NEW: Fedora-30-20190415.n.2

= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images:  13
Added packages:  7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   152
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  30.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   5.69 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -347.51 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Design_suite live i386
Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-i386-30-20190415.n.2.iso
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-30-20190415.n.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-30-20190415.n.2.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-30-20190415.n.2-sda.raw.xz
Image: LXDE raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-LXDE-armhfp-30-20190415.n.2-sda.raw.xz
Image: Mate live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-MATE_Compiz-Live-x86_64-30-20190415.n.2.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 ppc64le
Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-30-20190413.n.1.ppc64le.qcow2
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz ppc64le
Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-30-20190413.n.1.ppc64le.raw.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-30-20190413.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-30-20190413.n.1.s390x.raw.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-30-20190413.n.1.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Python_Classroom live i386
Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-i386-30-20190413.n.1.iso
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-30-20190413.n.1.s390x.qcow2
Image: Cloud_Base vmdk ppc64le
Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-30-20190413.n.1.ppc64le.vmdk
Image: Container_Base docker s390x
Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-30-20190413.n.1.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Games live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-x86_64-30-20190413.n.1.iso
Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-30-20190413.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz
Image: Workstation live i386
Path: Workstation/i386/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-30-20190413.n.1.iso
Image: Cloud_Base vmdk s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-30-20190413.n.1.s390x.vmdk

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: deepin-clone-1.1.0-2.fc30
Summary: Disk and partition backup/restore tool
RPMs:deepin-clone
Size:11.40 MiB

Package: ghc-hgettext-0.1.31.0-5.fc30
Summary: Haskell binding to libintl
RPMs:ghc-hgettext ghc-hgettext-devel
Size:17.89 MiB

Package: golang-github-anacrolix-dms-0-0.1.20190409git8af4925.fc30
Summary: A UPnP DLNA Digital Media Server that includes basic video transcoding
RPMs:golang-github-anacrolix-dms-devel
Size:56.00 KiB

Package: python-aiohttp-socks-0.2.2-1.fc30
Summary: SOCKS proxy connector for aiohttp
RPMs:python3-aiohttp-socks
Size:26.00 KiB

Package: python-bids-validator-1.2.2-1.fc30
Summary: Validator for the Brain Imaging Data Structure
RPMs:python3-bids-validator
Size:22.95 KiB

Package: python-zeep-3.3.1-1.fc30
Summary: A fast and modern Python SOAP client
RPMs:python3-zeep
Size:190.32 KiB

Package: xonsh-0.8.12-1.fc30
Summary: A general purpose, Python-ish shell
RPMs:xonsh
Size:803.61 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CImg-1:2.5.6-2.fc30
Old package:  CImg-1:2.4.5-2.fc30
Summary:  C++ Template Image Processing Toolkit
RPMs: CImg-devel
Size: 11.05 MiB
Size change:  14.68 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 16 2019 josef radinger  - 1:2.5.2-1
  - bump version

  * Sat Mar 16 2019 josef radinger  - 1:2.5.2-2
  - fix release in spec-file

  * Sun Mar 17 2019 josef radinger  - 1:2.5.3-1
  - bump version

  * Sun Mar 17 2019 josef radinger  - 1:2.5.4-1
  - bump version

  * Fri Mar 29 2019 josef radinger  - 1:2.5.5-1
  - bump version

  * Mon Apr 08 2019 josef radinger  - 1:2.5.6-2
  - bump version


Package:  analitza-18.12.3-1.fc30
Old package:  analitza-18.12.2-1.fc30
Summary:  Library of mathematical features
RPMs: analitza analitza-devel
Size: 3.46 MiB
Size change:  -388 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Mar 03 2019 Rex Dieter  - 18.12.2-2
  - rebuild (qt5)

  * Fri Mar 08 2019 Rex Dieter  - 18.12.3-1
  - 18.12.3


Package:  appmenu-qt5-0.3.0+16.10.20160628.1-14.fc30
Old package:  appmenu-qt5-0.3.0+16.10.20160628.1-13.fc30
Summary:  Support for global DBus-exported application menu in Qt5
RPMs: appmenu-qt5 appmenu-qt5-profile.d
Size: 768.60 KiB
Size change:  4.56 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Mar 03 2019 Rex Dieter  - 
0.3.0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

[nils]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-04-16 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
   At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.

More information available at: [Modularity Team 
Docs](https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/)

The agenda for the meeting is available as flagged tickets [in the Modularity 
repository](https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open=Meeting).



Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

[Robert-André Mauchin]

Hi,

In Golang, we have a lot of cyclic dependencies for which we have to bootstrap 
many packages, and then later build them unbootstrapped when all the deps are 
in place.
How are we supposed to handle this in Modularity? Since it rebuilds all 
packages from the start, it will fail to build cyclic deps. Is there a way to 
turn on the --with bootstrap switch in Modularity? Are we supposed to build 
the package two times, one with bootstrap, and later without?

Best regards,

Robert-André

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190415.n.2 nightly compose nominated for testing

[rawhide]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Branched 20190415.n.2. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Notable package version changes:
anaconda - 20190411.n.0: anaconda-30.25.5-1.fc30.src, 20190415.n.2: 
anaconda-30.25.6-1.fc30.src
lorax - 20190411.n.0: lorax-30.17-1.fc30.src, 20190415.n.2: 
lorax-30.18-1.fc30.src
pungi - 20190411.n.0: pungi-4.1.33-6.fc30.src, 20190415.n.2: 
pungi-4.1.35-1.fc30.src

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/30

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Security_Lab

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190415.n.2 nightly compose nominated for testing

[Phil Wyett]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 02:17 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 30 Branched 20190415.n.2. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> 
> Notable package version changes:
> anaconda - 20190411.n.0: anaconda-30.25.5-1.fc30.src, 20190415.n.2: anaconda-
> 30.25.6-1.fc30.src
> lorax - 20190411.n.0: lorax-30.17-1.fc30.src, 20190415.n.2: lorax-30.18-
> 1.fc30.src
> pungi - 20190411.n.0: pungi-4.1.33-6.fc30.src, 20190415.n.2: pungi-4.1.35-
> 1.fc30.src
> 
> Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
> https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/30
> 
> You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> 
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Summary
> 
> The individual test result pages are:
> 
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Installation
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Base
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Server
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Cloud
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Desktop
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Branched_20190415.n.2_Security_Lab
> 
> Thank you for testing!
> -- 
> Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
> 

Hi,

Tested this compose quickly and still running into bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699746

Proposed blocker for final of course.

Regards

Phil

- -- 
*** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.***

Playing the game for the games sake.

Twitter: kathenasorg
IRC: kathenas
Web: https://kathenas.org
Github: https://github.com/kathenas
GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas

GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=rF+y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

[Jerry James]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:00 PM Antonio Trande  wrote:
> On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote
> > Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon?  I packaged
> > it because I thought I was going to use it, but I ended up not using it.
>
> Add me, please.
> My FAS: sagitter

I can comaintain too, if you like.  FAS: jjames.

Antonio, I'm so sorry.  I had some unexpected $REALLIFE events happen
last week, and I have not been able to squeeze out any time for Fedora
for the last several days as a direct consequence.  It looks like you
have been building stuff in your copr project, though.  If you still
need me to help out with that, let me know.  At this point, I'm not
sure where you are in the process, so I'm afraid I'll do more harm
than good by trying to step in.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 30-20190415.n.2 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/23 (i386)

ID: 383856  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383856
ID: 383857  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383857
ID: 383858  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383858
ID: 383876  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383876
ID: 383877  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383877
ID: 383880  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383880
ID: 383902  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383902
ID: 383904  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383904
ID: 383944  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383944
ID: 383951  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383951
ID: 383994  Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383994

Soft failed openQA tests: 3/23 (i386), 2/146 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 383863  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383863
ID: 383864  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383864
ID: 383882  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383882
ID: 383883  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383883
ID: 383885  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/383885

Passed openQA tests: 135/146 (x86_64), 19/23 (i386)

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 171
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

[Igor Gnatenko]

You can do something like:

rpms:
  foo-bootstrap:
name: foo
  bar:
buildafter:
  - foo-bootstrap
  foo:
buildafter:
  - bar

However, MBS doesn't support that yet.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 1:35 AM Robert-André Mauchin 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In Golang, we have a lot of cyclic dependencies for which we have to
> bootstrap
> many packages, and then later build them unbootstrapped when all the deps
> are
> in place.
> How are we supposed to handle this in Modularity? Since it rebuilds all
> packages from the start, it will fail to build cyclic deps. Is there a way
> to
> turn on the --with bootstrap switch in Modularity? Are we supposed to
> build
> the package two times, one with bootstrap, and later without?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699397] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.86 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699397

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.86-1.f
   ||c31



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
Some fixes, some new features. Suitable for Fedora ≥ 30.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699462] perl-Log-ger-0.027 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699462

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Log-ger-0.027-1.fc31
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-04-15 07:22:19



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699433] fusioninventory-agent-2.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699433

Johan Cwiklinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|maria...@tuxette.fr |jo...@x-tnd.be



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699397] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.86 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699397



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.86-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-80307c71b1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699462] perl-Log-ger-0.027 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699462



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-ger-0.027-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5d7ec34e4d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699433] fusioninventory-agent-2.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699433

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
fusioninventory-agent-2.5-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-afb203158e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 243  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
  51  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2   
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
  45  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9c2c40e3df   
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el7
  24  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-317c9a2f81   
drupal7-7.65-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294   
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
  17  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f1efad2982   
aria2-1.34.0-4.el7
  16  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7bae341677   
chromium-73.0.3683.86-2.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c9cd2d9a6c   
ntfs-3g-2017.3.23-11.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50a6a1ddfd   
afflib-3.7.18-2.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c739f0a89d   
openjpeg2-2.3.1-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-77190f3ef7   
python34-3.4.10-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8395a0247   
transmission-2.94-6.el7
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-6ea040e59b   
hostapd-2.7-1.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-ae064347d8   
python3-jinja2-2.8.1-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

f2fs-tools-1.12.0-1.el7
python-catkin_lint-1.6.0-1.el7
python-prompt_toolkit-1.0.16-1.el7
sakura-3.6.0-4.el7

Details about builds:



 f2fs-tools-1.12.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-55c88cec0a)
 Tools for Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS)

Update Information:

- Update to 1.12.0, fixes rhbz#1603942 and rhbz#1674870 - added libblkid-devel
as BR, added new binary sg_write_buffer

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1603942 - f2fs-tools: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603942
  [ 2 ] Bug #1674870 - f2fs-tools: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674870




 python-catkin_lint-1.6.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1fd88e4372)
 Check catkin packages for common errors

Update Information:

Introduction of EPEL 7 package.




 python-prompt_toolkit-1.0.16-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-02ad67d6e3)
 Library for building powerful interactive command lines in Python

Update Information:

- Update to the latest 1.0 version - Don't use common documentation directory
since it can cause upgrade issues

ChangeLog:

* Sun Apr 14 2019 Carl George  - 1.0.16-1
- Update to the latest 1.0 version
- Don't use common documentation directory since it can cause upgrade issues




 sakura-3.6.0-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-87bebb680e)
 Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE

Update Information:

- add patches from debian, fixes rhbz #1641276 and rhbz #1698150     Sakura
is a terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE. It's a terminal emulator with few
dependencies, so you don't need a full GNOME desktop installed to have a decent
terminal emulator.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1179499 - RFE: Please branch sakura for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179499
  [ 2 ] Bug #1698150 - Sakura terminal segfaults on original tab close
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698150
  [ 3 ] Bug #1641276 - [abrt] sakura: sakura_child_exited(): sakura killed by 
SIGSEGV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641276


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 

Orphaned packages need new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.

Grep the list for your FAS name, follow the transitive deps:
   https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-04-15.txt

Request package ownership via releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issues

Packages retired today are still listed in this report: xcdroast
Packages retired earlier but still listed in this report: SimplyHTML


Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

PyMca orphan   2 weeks ago
Ray   orphan   2 weeks ago
SimplyHTMLmizdebsk, orphan 9 weeks ago
aeskulap  orphan   0 weeks ago
ahkab orphan   1 weeks ago
arc-theme besser82, dbenoit, orphan1 weeks ago
astyleorphan   0 weeks ago
cmusphinx3jjames, orphan   6 weeks ago
codeblocksorphan, sharkcz  0 weeks ago
cwiid orphan   2 weeks ago
dvdbackup cicku, orphan0 weeks ago
emacs-pymacs  orphan   0 weeks ago
gnome-dvb-daemon  orphan   0 weeks ago
gnome-shell-extension-orphan   0 weeks ago
openweather
gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd   orphan   0 weeks ago
gnue-common   orphan   2 weeks ago
jam-control   orphan   2 weeks ago
ktechlab  chitlesh, orphan 1 weeks ago
lightdm-gtk   cwickert, dbenoit, orphan,   1 weeks ago
  rdieter
linsmith  chitlesh, orphan 1 weeks ago
nodejs-after  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-alter  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ansi-font  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ansidiff   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-archiver   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-archiver-utils nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ast-traverse   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-ast-types  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-astral nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-astral-angular-annotatenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-astral-passnodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-async-cachenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-async-each nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-aws-sign2  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-base64-js  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-basic-auth-parser  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-bl nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-bluebird   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-breakable  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-camel-case nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-caniuse-db nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-change-casenodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-clean-css  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-clone  nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-clsnodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-co nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-commoner   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-compress-commons   nodejs-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
nodejs-console-browserify nodejs-sig, orphan 

Philosophical question regarding setuptools dependency

[José Abílio Matos]

Hi,
  recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit):
"setuptools is required at runtime"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695045

The obvious fix is to add python3-setuptools as a BR for python3-doit.

My question here is if I should report this upstream?
If this requirement were in the dependencies of the package the auto generator 
would had picked initially.

What do you think?

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Old EPEL packages in Bodhi testing

[Troy Dawson]

Working on a project that deals with Bodhi updates that are in
testing, I found many old EPEL packages that are still in testing.
How many are we talking, and how old?
The following dates are based off the last modification of the bodhi
update,  In most cases this is when it was done being tested.

2011 - 8 total
  EPEL6: 8
  EPEL7: 0
2012 - 17 total
  EPEL6: 17
  EPEL7: 0
2013 - 41 total
  EPEL6: 41
  EPEL7: 0
2014 - 44 total
  EPEL6: 31
  EPEL7: 13
2015 - 153 total
  EPEL6: 113
  EPEL7: 40
2016 - 104 total
  EPEL6: 37
  EPEL7: 67
2017 - 116 total
  EPEL6: 32
  EPEL7: 84
2018 - 43 total
  EPEL6: 13
  EPEL7: 30
2019 - 148 total
  EPEL6: 31
  EPEL7: 117

I don't consider 2017, 2018 or 2019 very old.  But everything beyond
that I start thinking needs to get cleaned up.
My proposal is that everything 2014 and older be closed, or whatever
the term is.  They are so old that if they are really needed, they
need to be rebuilt.

I am attaching the lists for everything 2014 and older.  But just for
grins, here are the 2011 packages.

2011-02-14 16:21:38 ["cairomm-1.8.6-1.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-0358
2011-05-27 10:28:08 ["fastx_toolkit-0.0.13-4.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-3428
2011-06-24 11:54:24 ["pootle-2.1.6-1.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-3086
2011-07-08 19:54:08 ["mediawiki116-semantic-1.5.6-2.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-3760
2011-08-12 08:15:08 ["pam_shield-0.9.5-9.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-af9c118595
2011-09-15 03:09:05 ["autogen-5.9.4-7.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-4434
2011-10-19 19:03:21 ["netdisco-1.1-1.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-4742
2011-12-31 19:07:08 ["trac-peerreview-plugin-0.11-5.svn11062.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0004

Troy Dawson


epel-list-2012
Description: Binary data


epel-list-2014
Description: Binary data


epel-list-2011
Description: Binary data


epel-list-2013
Description: Binary data
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1700135] New: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.77 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700135

Bug ID: 1700135
   Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.77 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
trem...@tremble.org.uk
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.77
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.76-2.fc30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/YAML-LibYAML/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3548/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Old EPEL packages in Bodhi testing

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 4/15/19 9:36 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Working on a project that deals with Bodhi updates that are in
> testing, I found many old EPEL packages that are still in testing.
> How many are we talking, and how old?
> The following dates are based off the last modification of the bodhi
> update,  In most cases this is when it was done being tested.

...snip...

> 
> I don't consider 2017, 2018 or 2019 very old.  But everything beyond
> that I start thinking needs to get cleaned up.
> My proposal is that everything 2014 and older be closed, or whatever
> the term is.  They are so old that if they are really needed, they
> need to be rebuilt.

+1

I guess these don't show up in the updates-testing reports because they
have _some_ karma, just not enough to go to stable. Perhaps we should
see about getting that report fixed as well?

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699237] perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.15-7.fc29 FTBFS: tests fail with perl-Mojolicious-8.06

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699237

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.20-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fff1d008fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-04-16 - 92% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/04/16/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190415git68b6319.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699433] fusioninventory-agent-2.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699433

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
fusioninventory-agent-2.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-afb203158e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699397] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.86 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699397

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.86-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-80307c71b1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699462] perl-Log-ger-0.027 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699462



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-ger-0.027-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5d7ec34e4d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1700138] New: perl-Module-Build-0.4229 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700138

Bug ID: 1700138
   Summary: perl-Module-Build-0.4229 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Module-Build
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.4229
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.42.24-11.fc30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Build/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3077/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1700166] New: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166

Bug ID: 1700166
   Summary: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, or...@nwra.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.22
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.21-7.fc30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Headers-Fast/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7442/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1696450] perl-DB_File-1.851 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696450

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc31   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc31
   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30
   ||perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc31   |perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc31
   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30
   ||perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  46  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced   
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
  25  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-62f9745b71   
drupal7-7.65-1.el6
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-73e99f4a82   
python34-3.4.10-1.el6
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9f732040bd   
python3-jinja2-2.8.1-2.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

python-regex-2019.04.14-1.el6
zchunk-1.1.1-2.el6

Details about builds:



 python-regex-2019.04.14-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-6cf8b1b485)
 Alternative regular expression module, to replace re

Update Information:

Update to the latest released version.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 15 2019 Thomas Moschny  - 2019.04.14-1
- Update to 2019.04.14.
* Sat Mar  9 2019 Thomas Moschny  - 2019.03.09-1
- Update to 2019.03.09.




 zchunk-1.1.1-2.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-149a9e1b96)
 Compressed file format that allows easy deltas

Update Information:

Compilation fixes for old GCC in EL6


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1696450] perl-DB_File-1.851 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696450

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc31   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc31
   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30
   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28
   ||perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc29



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1694342] perl-DB_File-1.850 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694342

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc31   |perl-DB_File-1.850-1.fc31
   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc30
   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28   |perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc28
   ||perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc29



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.851-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698315] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698315

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462-1.f |perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462-1.f
   |c31 |c31
   ||perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462-1.f
   ||c30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-04-16 03:55:07



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698172] perl-Sereal-4.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172
Bug 1698172 depends on bug 1698173, which changed state.

Bug 1698173 Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1697633] perl-Sereal-4.006 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697633
Bug 1697633 depends on bug 1697635, which changed state.

Bug 1697635 Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006-1
   |.fc31   |.fc31
   ||perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1
   ||.fc30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-04-16 03:55:03



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698173] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1
   |.fc31   |.fc31
   ||perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1
   ||.fc30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-04-16 03:54:59



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698174] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1
   |.fc31   |.fc31
   ||perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1
   ||.fc30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-04-16 03:55:02



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698172] perl-Sereal-4.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172
Bug 1698172 depends on bug 1698174, which changed state.

Bug 1698174 Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006-1
   |.fc31   |.fc31
   ||perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1
   ||.fc30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-04-16 03:55:00



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1697633] perl-Sereal-4.006 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697633
Bug 1697633 depends on bug 1697634, which changed state.

Bug 1697634 Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 244  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
  52  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2   
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
  46  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9c2c40e3df   
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el7
  25  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-317c9a2f81   
drupal7-7.65-1.el7
  20  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294   
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
  18  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f1efad2982   
aria2-1.34.0-4.el7
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50a6a1ddfd   
afflib-3.7.18-2.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c739f0a89d   
openjpeg2-2.3.1-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-77190f3ef7   
python34-3.4.10-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8395a0247   
transmission-2.94-6.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-6ea040e59b   
hostapd-2.7-1.el7
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-ae064347d8   
python3-jinja2-2.8.1-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

banshee-2.6.2-11.2.el7
cekit-3.0.0-0.7.20190408git45cab46.el7
kim-api-2.0.2-2.el7
perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults-1.20180923-2.el7
python-regex-2019.04.14-1.el7
zchunk-1.1.1-2.el7

Details about builds:



 banshee-2.6.2-11.2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3eed2a4655)
 Easily import, manage, and play selections from your music collection

Update Information:

Remove libipod-sharp dependencies (#1647999)

ChangeLog:

* Sat Apr 13 2019 Pablo Greco  - 2.6.2-11.2
- Allow to build in armhfp
* Wed Apr 10 2019 Troy Dawson  - 2.6.2-11.1
- Remove libgpod-sharp dependencies (#1647999)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1647999 - EPEL7 - banshee won't install on RHEL 7.6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647999




 cekit-3.0.0-0.7.20190408git45cab46.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5efe53a018)
 Container image creation tool

Update Information:

Update to revision `45cab46`:
https://github.com/cekit/cekit/tree/45cab4657e3c925762dc33299ee5268b45b4e26e

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr  8 2019 Marek Goldmann  - 
3.0.0-0.7.20190408git45cab46
- Updated revision to 45cab46




 kim-api-2.0.2-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-4434bd815d)
 Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API

Update Information:

Initial add

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1699487 - Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of 
Interatomic Models KIM API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699487




 perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults-1.20180923-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-ed7b3b5e16)
 Object Oriented Authentication-Results Headers

Update Information:

Initial package.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1699030 - Review Request: perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults - Object 
Oriented Authentication-Results Headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699030




 python-regex-2019.04.14-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3dccc77c8d)
 Alternative regular expression module, to replace re

Update Information:

Update to the latest released version.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Apr 15 2019 Thomas Moschny  - 2019.04.14-1
- Update to 2019.04.14.