Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1

2010-02-24 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:43:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
 From today's #sugar-meeting:
 
 erikos bernie: I think a big problem to recruit 0.88 testers, is that there 
 are no xo images
 erikos bernie: scratch builds, like tomeu said, sounds good
 erikos bernie: and then create a repo
 erikos bernie: maybe mtd is interested in that, too
 
 Ok, I'll create some custom F11-XO1 builds with the latest Sugar
 packages retrofitted for testing purposes.

Sorry if it's been answered already: I wonder why you prefer 0.88 on
F11 for XO-1 builds, rather than 0.88 (or latest) on F12 (or latest)
for XO-1 builds?

Martin


pgpcHThD68w6m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1

2010-02-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 17:50 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
 Sorry if it's been answered already: I wonder why you prefer 0.88 on
 F11 for XO-1 builds, rather than 0.88 (or latest) on F12 (or latest)
 for XO-1 builds?

Stabilizing a new Fedora release on the XO-1 is likely to take more time
than I can dedicate to it.

If someone would like to champion an F12 effort, I'd be glad to help
out.

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs   - http://sugarlabs.org/

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel