Re: [Development] CI for QNX 6.5.0
Hi Tony, I believe it would do it. Would it be possible, then? If so, great news :) Thanks, Rafael On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:08:29AM +, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: Hi Would it be enough if we added it only to the nightly 'state' builds? Having it in the general configurations would once again increase the load that's already quite high. Building it once a day per branch for the whole Qt5 wouldn't be that bad. -Tony -Original Message- From: development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany.com@qt- project.org [mailto:development- bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Rafael Roquetto Sent: 26. tammikuuta 2015 21:57 To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List Subject: [Development] CI for QNX 6.5.0 Hello, What would be the possibility of getting the CI system to build for QNX 6.5.0, apart from 6.6.0 which it already does? Currently, I have been manually searching for merge requests that cause regressions but from time to time something always manages to slip thru, last case being https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/103616/. I understand QNX 6.5.0 compiler is somewhat old, but I personally believe it is important to continue supporting it, since there are still a lot of 6.5.0 deployments around, specially on environments where migration to a newer version is anything but trivial, since we are talking about high scale systems here. Having the CI test for QNX 650 too would be really handy. Any comments? Regards, Rafael -- Rafael Roquetto | rafael.roque...@kdab.com | Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions -- Rafael Roquetto | rafael.roque...@kdab.com | Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] CI for QNX 6.5.0
Hello, What would be the possibility of getting the CI system to build for QNX 6.5.0, apart from 6.6.0 which it already does? Currently, I have been manually searching for merge requests that cause regressions but from time to time something always manages to slip thru, last case being https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/103616/. I understand QNX 6.5.0 compiler is somewhat old, but I personally believe it is important to continue supporting it, since there are still a lot of 6.5.0 deployments around, specially on environments where migration to a newer version is anything but trivial, since we are talking about high scale systems here. Having the CI test for QNX 650 too would be really handy. Any comments? Regards, Rafael -- Rafael Roquetto | rafael.roque...@kdab.com | Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] CI for QNX 6.5.0
Hi Would it be enough if we added it only to the nightly 'state' builds? Having it in the general configurations would once again increase the load that's already quite high. Building it once a day per branch for the whole Qt5 wouldn't be that bad. -Tony -Original Message- From: development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany.com@qt- project.org [mailto:development- bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Rafael Roquetto Sent: 26. tammikuuta 2015 21:57 To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List Subject: [Development] CI for QNX 6.5.0 Hello, What would be the possibility of getting the CI system to build for QNX 6.5.0, apart from 6.6.0 which it already does? Currently, I have been manually searching for merge requests that cause regressions but from time to time something always manages to slip thru, last case being https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/103616/. I understand QNX 6.5.0 compiler is somewhat old, but I personally believe it is important to continue supporting it, since there are still a lot of 6.5.0 deployments around, specially on environments where migration to a newer version is anything but trivial, since we are talking about high scale systems here. Having the CI test for QNX 650 too would be really handy. Any comments? Regards, Rafael -- Rafael Roquetto | rafael.roque...@kdab.com | Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
