Re: [Issue 3280] comparing array length is wonky
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: > See bug 259. > Oh, gosh. I need multiple votes.
[Issue 3277] DMD includes a version of OleAut32.lib which is missing some functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3277 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #1 from Stewart Gordon 2009-09-01 18:27:31 PDT --- Since when has it been just that one .lib that's out of date? (See also issue 317 comment 1.) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3280] comparing array length is wonky
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3280 Jarrett Billingsley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jarrett.billings...@gmail.c ||om --- Comment #1 from Jarrett Billingsley 2009-09-01 17:09:24 PDT --- Sorry, invalid. typeof(s.length) is unsigned, typeof(-1) is signed. The compiler should throw an error on the last assert, but doesn't. Instead, it casts -1 to size_t, resulting in something like "assert(s.length > 0x);" See bug 259. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3280] comparing array length is wonky
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3280 Jarrett Billingsley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jarrett Billingsley 2009-09-01 17:09:39 PDT --- Oops -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3280] New: comparing array length is wonky
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3280
Summary: comparing array length is wonky
Product: D
Version: 2.031
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu
void main(){
string s;
int a = s.length;
assert(a == 0);
assert(s.length == 0);
assert(a == 0);
assert(a > -1);
assert(s.length > -1); //fails
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3279] New: Type tuple comparison fails
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3279
Summary: Type tuple comparison fails
Product: D
Version: 2.032
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bart...@relisoft.com
I get this strange error message:
Error: incompatible types for (((long, int)) == ((long, int))): '(long, int)'
and '(long, int)'
when compiling this program:
import std.typetuple;
template TypeList(T...)
{
alias T toTuple;
}
template snoC(T, alias List)
{
alias TypeList!(List.toTuple, T) snoC;
}
static assert (snoC!(int, TypeList!(long)).toTuple == TypeTuple!(long, int));
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3278] New: Empty tuples don't match
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3278
Summary: Empty tuples don't match
Product: D
Version: 2.032
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bart...@relisoft.com
A tuple containing an empty tuple is not the same as an empty tuple and two
such beasts are considered incompatible.
import std.typetuple;
template TypeList(T...)
{
alias T toTuple;
}
static assert (TypeList!().toTuple == TypeTuple!());
Error: incompatible types for ((()) == (())): '()' and '()'
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1253] array initializers as expressions are not allowed in const arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1253
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Don 2009-09-01 08:24:13 PDT ---
And here's a patch.
Cause: The initializer is used in declaration.c, VarDeclaration::semantic().
We see the lines:
--
Expression *e = init->toExpression();
if (!e)
{
init = init->semantic(sc, type);
e = init->toExpression();
if (!e)
--
The initializer is supposed to return NULL if the initializer semantic hasn't
been run yet. But the array initializer doesn't -- it prints an error, and
returns an ErrorExp instead! It never has a chance.
PATCH: init.c, last lines of ArrayInitializer::toExpression() (around line
473).
Lno:
delete elements;
- error(loc, "array initializers as expressions are not allowed");
- return new ErrorExp();
+return NULL;
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1253] array initializers as expressions are not allowed in const arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1253 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Version|0.175 |2.022 Summary|DMD 0.175 introduced bug: |array initializers as |array initializers as |expressions are not allowed |expressions are not |in const arrays |allowed?| Severity|regression |normal --- Comment #5 from Don 2009-09-01 07:33:56 PDT --- This works for me on D1.046. It was fixed somewhere between 1.020 and 1.041. It also works on DMD2.031, if you change 'const' to 'enum' to preserve the semantics. Oddly, however, on DMD2.031 the code as-written still displays: bug.d(173): Error: array initializers as expressions are not allowed So this is now a D2-only bug, which is not a regression. It's never worked with these semantics. Checked as far back as 2.022. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3173] ICE(mtype.c) on wrong code (double to long to int conversion)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Comment #3 from Don 2009-09-01 04:25:11 PDT ---
Patch was incomplete, fails for the test case below. Need to also add this code
to the end of CastExp::getIntRange()
+ if (type->isintegral()) {
ir.imin &= type->sizemask();
ir.imax &= type->sizemask();
+}
return ir;
}
Test case:
ubyte b = 6;
short c5 = cast(int)(b + 6.1);
This is arguably an ice-on-valid-code.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3277] New: DMD includes a version of OleAut32.lib which is missing some functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3277 Summary: DMD includes a version of OleAut32.lib which is missing some functions Product: D Version: 1.046 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: installer AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com ReportedBy: we...@beardmouse.org.uk As mentioned in the thread @ http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4747, DMD includes a version of OleAut32.lib which is missing some functions. Would it be possible to update it to a newer version? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1382] memory allocated for arrays in CTFE functions during compilation is not released
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |critical --- Comment #5 from Don 2009-08-31 23:59:27 PDT --- Reducing severity back to critical, since the voting system takes care of the importance. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3173] ICE(mtype.c) on wrong code (double to long to int conversion)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
OS/Version|Linux |All
--- Comment #2 from Don 2009-08-31 23:56:38 PDT ---
Cause: default case for getIntRange() assumes it's an integer, which isn't true
if there's casting.
Solution: if not an integer, assume it could contain anything.
PATCH: cast.c, line 1902 (in Walter's private beta of DMD2.032):
IntRange Expression::getIntRange()
{
IntRange ir;
ir.imin = 0;
if (type->isintegral())
ir.imax = type->sizemask();
else
ir.imax = 0xULL; // assume the worst
return ir;
}
===
TEST CASES FOR TEST SUITE
===
struct S3173{
double z;
}
int bug3173(int x) { return x; }
S3173 s3173;
double e3173 = 4;
const double d3173 = 4;
// invalid, but should not ICE
static assert(!is(typeof(bug3173(cast(long)e3173;
static assert(!is(typeof(bug3173(cast(long)s3173;
static assert(!is(typeof(bug3173(cast(long)3.256679e30;
// And two valid cases:
static assert(is(typeof(bug3173(cast(long)d3173;
static assert(is(typeof(bug3173(cast(long)3.256679e4;
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
