[Issue 3573] pure and nothrow allow function return type to be inferred

2017-07-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573

Bolpat  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|qs.il.paperi...@gmail.com   |

--

[Issue 3573] pure and nothrow allow function return type to be inferred

2017-07-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573

Vladimir Panteleev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev  ---
(In reply to Michal Minich from comment #0)
> 1. it is possible to declare function without specifying return type.
> 
> pure foo () {}
> pure foo () {}
> pure nothrow foo () {}

These are now implied to have an "auto" return type, i.e.:

pure foo () {}
pure bar () { return 1; }

pragma(msg, typeof(foo()).stringof); // prints "void"
pragma(msg, typeof(bar()).stringof); // prints "int"

--

[Issue 3573] pure and nothrow allow function return type to be inferred

2016-09-16 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573

Bolpat  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||qs.il.paperi...@gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from Bolpat  ---
Isn't 1. a feature?

--

[Issue 3573] pure and nothrow allow function return type to be inferred

2013-11-16 Thread d-bugmail 
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3573


yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||burg.bas...@yahoo.com


--- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-11-17 18:08:31 EST ---
*** Issue 11491 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---