Re: Labels in struct
On 31.01.15 17:04, tcak wrote:
I do not have a big example in the end to show, but is there any way to
put labels into struct definitions?
struct CommunicationMessage{
char[2] signature;
mainData:
int info1;
int info2;
extraData:
ushort checksum;
content:
}
Members of type struct are actualy labels.
struct CommunicationMessage{
struct Md {
int info1;
int info2;
};
struct Ed {
ushort checksum;
}
struct Cnt {
}
char[2] signature;
Md mainData;
Ed extraData;
Cnt content;
}
Re: How to make a Currency class from std.BigInt?
On 31.01.15 15:56, zeljkog wrote: On 31.01.15 15:45, RuZzz wrote: Maybe I need good examples on C++, for this class, because a lot of examples on C++. Maybe this can help you: https://github.com/andersonpd/decimal Also http://code.dlang.org/packages/eris
Re: How to make a Currency class from std.BigInt?
On 31.01.15 15:45, RuZzz wrote: Maybe I need good examples on C++, for this class, because a lot of examples on C++. Maybe this can help you: https://github.com/andersonpd/decimal
Error: closures are not yet supported in CTFE
I tried:
--
import std.stdio, std.algorithm;
auto unique(){
bool[int] c;
return (int a){
if (a in c)
return false;
else{
c[a] = true;
return true;
}
};
}
void main()
{
[1, 5, 5, 2, 1, 5, 6, 6].filter!(unique()).writeln;
}
--
And got:
Error: closures are not yet supported in CTFE
This works:
void main()
{
auto x = unique();
[1, 5, 5, 2, 1, 5, 6, 6].filter!x.writeln;
}
Is first version near?
Re: Defining a static array with values in a range
On 22.01.15 20:05, Meta wrote: On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 19:00:47 UTC, zeljkog wrote: On 22.01.15 19:26, Meta wrote: On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 18:23:00 UTC, Meta wrote: Whoops, I forgot to make it a template to force CTFE. You can force CTFE assigning to manifest constant. enum t = charRange!... By wrapping it in a template the array will always be generated at compile time, even if you assign it to a runtime variable. Yes, but then you can not use runtime spec.
Re: Defining a static array with values in a range
On 22.01.15 19:26, Meta wrote: On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 18:23:00 UTC, Meta wrote: Whoops, I forgot to make it a template to force CTFE. You can force CTFE assigning to manifest constant. enum t = charRange!...
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
If you wish run this just add:
struct S{
int n1, n2, n3, n4, n5 ...;
}
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 19.12.14 23:56, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> Can we see the test code please.
>
> Ali
import std.stdio, std.datetime, std.random;
int N = 10_000;
int len = 1000;
int k = 4;
struct S{
int n1, n2;
//~ this(this){
//~ writeln("this(this)");
//~ }
}
ref T[] append(T, Args...)(ref T[] arr, auto ref Args args)
{
static if (args.length == 1)
return arr ~= args[0];
else{
arr.length += args.length;
foreach(i, ref e; args)
arr[$ - args.length + i] = e;
return arr;
}
}
void append1(T)(ref T[] arr, T[] args...)
{
arr ~= args;
}
void main() {
S[] arr1 = new S[len];
S[] arr2, arr3, arr4, arr5;
foreach (i; 0..len)
arr1[i] = S(uniform(0, 100), uniform(0, 100));
auto sw = new StopWatch;
sw.start();
foreach(n; 0..N){
for (int i = 0; i < len; i += k){
arr2 ~= arr1[i];
arr2 ~= arr1[i+1];
arr2 ~= arr1[i+2];
arr2 ~= arr1[i+3];
//~ arr2 ~= arr1[i+4];
//~ arr2 ~= arr1[i+5];
}
delete arr2;
}
sw.stop();
long tm = sw.peek.msecs;
writeln(tm);
sw.reset();
sw.start();
foreach(n; 0..N){
for (int i = 0; i < len; i += k){
arr3 ~= [arr1[i], arr1[i+1], arr1[i+2], arr1[i+3]/+ , arr1[i+4],
arr1[i+5] +/];
}
delete arr3;
}
sw.stop();
tm = sw.peek.msecs;
writeln(tm);
sw.reset();
sw.start();
foreach(n; 0..N){
for (int i = 0; i < len; i += k){
arr4.append(arr1[i], arr1[i+1], arr1[i+2], arr1[i+3]/+ , arr1[i+4],
arr1[i+5] +/);
}
delete arr4;
}
sw.stop();
tm = sw.peek.msecs;
writeln(tm);
sw.reset();
sw.start();
foreach(n; 0..N){
for (int i = 0; i < len; i += k){
arr5.append1(arr1[i], arr1[i+1], arr1[i+2], arr1[i+3]/+ , arr1[i+4],
arr1[i+5] +/);
}
delete arr5;
}
sw.stop();
tm = sw.peek.msecs;
writeln(tm);
}
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 19.12.14 16:25, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: This is surprising to me. I would expect especially ints to be faster. In reality, there is no difference between arr ~= args and arr.length += args.length, and then copying, it's just how you do the copying. Perhaps it's the call to memcpy in the runtime that is slower than looping. I think it's compile time looping, it's unrolled. Did you compile both tests with the same command line parameters? Yes.
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 18.12.14 14:50, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I wonder how your code compares to this:
>
> void append(T)(ref T[] arr, T[] args...)
> {
> arr ~= args;
> }
This is ~20% slower for ints, but it difference increases for bigger structs.
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 17.12.14 13:30, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
void append(T, Args...)(ref T[] data, Args args)
{
static size_t estimateLength(Args args)
{
size_t result;
foreach(e; args)
static if(hasLength!(typeof(e)))
result += e.length;
else
result += 1;
return result;
}
auto app = appender!(T[])(data);
app.reserve(data.length + estimateLength(args));
foreach(e; args)
app.put(e);
data = app.data;
}
void main()
{
import std.stdio;
int[] data;
append(data, 1, 2, only(1, 2, 3), iota(4, 9));
writeln(data);
}
---
Maybe appender.put should get an overload that does the same, though I
didn't had the need for it yet.
It's for convenient one line: arr.append(e1, e2, ...);
I said "something like that" :)
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 15.12.14 01:00, "Nordlöw" wrote:
> Isn't this algorithm already encoded somewhere in Phobos?
void append(T, Args...)(ref T[] arr, auto ref Args args){
{
static if (args.length == 1)
arr ~= args[0]; // inlined
else{
arr.length += args.length;
foreach(i, e; args)
arr[$ - args.length + i] = e;
}
}
I've just tested, this looks usable.
Equal for 1 item, considerably (~40%) faster for 2, and much (100+%) faster for
more.
Also more convenient.
Maybe samthing like that should go to Fobos.
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 15.12.14 01:00, "Nordlöw" wrote: Isn't this algorithm already encoded somewhere in Phobos? I don't know.
Re: Fastest Way to Append Multiple Elements to an Array
On 15.12.14 00:16, "Nordlöw" wrote:
> or some other trick?
void append(T, Args...)(ref T[] arr, Args args){
arr.length += args.length;
foreach(i, e; args)
arr[$ - args.length + i] = args[i];
}
void main()
{
int[] arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
arr.append(3, 10, 14);
writeln(arr);
}
output:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3, 10, 14]
Re: fibers and ranges: what's wrong here?
On 13.12.14 13:01, zeljkog wrote:
void main() {
auto tt = Tree(5, [Tree(7,[Tree(11), Tree(4)]), Tree(10)]);
auto tr1 = TreeRange(tt);
foreach(v; tr1){
writef("%2d, ", v);
}
writeln();
for(auto r = TreeRange(tt); !r.empty; r.popFront())
writef("%2d, ", r.front);
writeln();
}
Sorry, this works:
void main() {
auto tt = Tree(5, [Tree(7,[Tree(11), Tree(4)]), Tree(10)]);
foreach(v; TreeRange(tt)){
writef("%2d, ", v);
}
writeln();
for(auto r = TreeRange(tt); !r.empty; r.popFront())
writef("%2d, ", r.front);
writeln();
}
I needed this:
struct TreeRange{
this (this){ throw new Exception("TreeRange is noncopyable!"); }
...
}
Or use class :)
fibers and ranges: what's wrong here?
import std.stdio, core.thread;
struct Tree{
int val;
Tree[] tree;
}
struct TreeRange{
Tree curtree;
bool empty;
Fiber worker;
this(Tree t){
worker = new Fiber(&fiberFunc);
curtree = t;
popFront();
}
void fiberFunc(){
Tree t = curtree;
Fiber.yield();
foreach(child; t.tree){
curtree = child;
fiberFunc();
}
}
int front(){ return curtree.val; };
void popFront() {
worker.call();
empty = worker.state == Fiber.State.TERM;
}
}
void main() {
auto tt = Tree(5, [Tree(7,[Tree(11), Tree(4)]), Tree(10)]);
auto tr1 = TreeRange(tt);
foreach(v; tr1){
writef("%2d, ", v);
}
writeln();
for(auto r = TreeRange(tt); !r.empty; r.popFront())
writef("%2d, ", r.front);
writeln();
}
output:
5, 5, 5, 5, 5,
5, 7, 11, 4, 10,
Is it supposed to work?
Re: toUTFz and WinAPI GetTextExtentPoint32W
On 21.09.2011 19:12, Christophe Travert wrote: Nice. It is better with gdc linux 64bits too. I wanted to avoid conditional expressions like ?: but it's actually slightly faster that way. It is not compiled in as conditional jump.
Re: toUTFz and WinAPI GetTextExtentPoint32W
On 21.09.2011 01:57, Christophe wrote:
size_t myCount(string text)
{
size_t n = text.length;
for (uint i=0; i>6;
n -= (s>>1) - ((s+1)>>2);
}
return n;
}
Here is a more readable and a bit faster version on dmd windows:
size_t utfCount(string text)
{
size_t n = 0;
for (uint i=0; i>6)^0b10)? 1: 0;
return n;
}
