On Saturday, 31 January 2015 at 14:12:59 UTC, Phil wrote:
When trying to run my program with profiling enabled it dies
before the first line of my main function runs. Everything
works fine without profiling. I get the following stack trace:
thread #1: tid = 0x38de4, 0x00010008d985
vision_entry`gc_malloc + 49, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread',
stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)
frame #0: 0x00010008d985 vision_entry`gc_malloc + 49
vision_entry`gc_malloc + 49:
-> 0x10008d985: movq (%rdi), %rbx
0x10008d988: callq *0x60(%rbx)
0x10008d98c: popq %rbx
0x10008d98d: movq %rbp, %rsp
(lldb) thread backtrace
* thread #1: tid = 0x38de4, 0x00010008d985
vision_entry`gc_malloc + 49, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread',
stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)
* frame #0: 0x00010008d985 vision_entry`gc_malloc + 49
frame #1: 0x0001000908f5 vision_entry`_d_newclass + 117
frame #2: 0x0001000b4b28
vision_entry`D3std9exception7bailOutFNaNfAyamxAaZv + 40
frame #3: 0x0001000b4d06
vision_entry`D3std9exception14__T7enforceTbZ7enforceFNaNfbLAxaAyamZb
+ 94
frame #4: 0x0001000c4df6
vision_entry`D3std5stdio4File17LockingTextWriter6__ctorMFNcNeKS3std5stdio4FileZS3std5stdio4File17LockingTextWriter
+ 86
frame #5: 0x0001000c4f19
vision_entry`D3std5stdio4File17lockingTextWriterMFZS3std5stdio4File17LockingTextWriter
+ 41
frame #6: 0x00012c74
vision_entry`D3std5stdio4File15__T8writeflnTaZ8writeflnMFxAaZv
+ 124 at stdio.d:1238
frame #7: 0x00010c06 vision_entry`_Dmain + 86 at
stdio.d:2727
frame #8: 0x00010009060c
vision_entry`D2rt6dmain211_d_run_mainUiPPaPUAAaZiZ6runAllMFZ9__lambda1MFZv
+ 40
frame #9: 0x000100090551
vision_entry`D2rt6dmain211_d_run_mainUiPPaPUAAaZiZ7tryExecMFMDFZvZv
+ 45
frame #10: 0x0001000905b1
vision_entry`D2rt6dmain211_d_run_mainUiPPaPUAAaZiZ6runAllMFZv +
45
frame #11: 0x000100090551
vision_entry`D2rt6dmain211_d_run_mainUiPPaPUAAaZiZ7tryExecMFMDFZvZv
+ 45
frame #12: 0x0001000904cd vision_entry`_d_run_main + 433
frame #13: 0x00010d29 vision_entry`main + 65
frame #14: 0x7fff883a45c9 libdyld.dylib`start + 1
Does anyone have any ideas of what could have caused this?
What is the source code of your main function?
I ask because it looks like it did. frame 13 is C main. frames 12
- 8 are compiler generated.
Frame 7 is D main.
frame #7: 0x00010c06 vision_entry`_Dmain + 86 at
stdio.d:2727
Frame 6 is std.stdio.writefln(...)
Frame 5 is the acquisition of the locking text writer
frame 4 is the constructor of the locking text writer. THIS IS
WHERE THE EXCEPTION IS THROWN.
as is evident by frame 3.
vision_entry`D3std9exception14__T7enforceTbZ7enforceFNaNfbLAxaAyamZb
+ 94
where the locking text writer is enforcing some condition.
(possibly that it received the correct amour of arguments)
Frame 2 is the enforce bailing out
Frames 1 is bailout() throwing a _new_ exception.
_d_newclass(exception)
frame 0 is the gc_malloc attempting to allocate the memory for
the exception.
and hits a
stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)
-> 0x10008d985: movq (%rdi), %rbx (rbx = *rdi)
null pointer somewhere.
your main function looks like
int main(string[] args)
{
writefln(...); // Double check whats going on here
...
return 0;
}
try
int main(string[] args)
{
try writefln(...); // Double check whats going on here
catch(exception e)
{
writeln("caught some exception"); // alternatively use
printf/puts if written also fails
}
...
return 0;
}
and you will see
caught some exception instead of the stack trace.
Are you profiling with an external profiler or using the compiler
to emit profile statistics?
My only guess is that there is a bug in the compiler's inserted
profiling code.
perhaps someone else will be able to help.
Nic