[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?
-Thanks Bill and Jose, I agree. Andy -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, I think it is not a good idea, at least so far. > > RRR, RO, and 73 are shorthand messages, no real text sent, but a combo > of tones, and that has adventages at very low levels compared to "real > text". > > Watch the waterfall when you get called and when you get those shortand > messages, > > 73, > > Jose, CO2JA > > > > > __ > > V Conferencia Internacional de Energ�a Renovable, Ahorro de Energ�a y Educaci�n Energ�tica. > 22 al 25 de mayo de 2007 > Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba > http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier > > Participe en Universidad 2008. > 11 al 15 de febrero del 2008. > Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba > http://www.universidad2008.cu >
[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?
Hi Andy, Think there is a mixed bag; some of use have used the WSJT modes for some time on vhf/uhf for EME and MS;p so we tend to stick to known conventions. So far I have seen no reason to deviate from that... 73 es be well, Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see a few are confused about the proper sequence and meaning of the > EME/MS related messages within JT65A of WSJT. So, am I. > > I wonder if us HFer's should try to be more straight forward? The > general use is described as.. > > > > "When a station copies both calls, he sends calls and report. > If he gets both calls and a report, he sends his report & Roger. > If he gets report and Roger, he sends Rogers. > When both get a pair of Rogers, the QSO is officially complete." > > The "report" mentioned above is traditionally the gridsquare in JT65A, > I find that useful. So , > > How about these messages > > CQ P5DX > > K3UK replies with message 1 P5DX K3UK FN02hk > > P5DX sees both calls and sends K3UK P5DX PM27 OOO QSL > > K3UK receives the report and sends QSL , thanks > > PD5DX sends... RRR 73 > K3UK sends ... RRR 73 > > I would keep RO, OOO, RRR in the messages because they also get > displayed in the waterfall. I'm not sure how/why yet, but that is my > weekend learning objective. > > > As I read more about the mdoe and the software, K1JT advocates the use > of standard operatings procedurees. So, maybe changing his convention > is not a good idea? > > > > Andy >
