[OSGeo-Discuss] Conf for 2008

2007-03-26 Thread Tim Bowden
Ok, so we haven't even had this years conf, but given the time it takes
for a local chapter to organise a conf, I think it would be a good idea
to start the process for selecting the location for the 2008 conf.  If
all goes well, perhaps the 2008 conf location could be announced at the
closing session of foss4g2007?

Just a thought,
Tim Bowden

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Conf for 2008

2007-03-26 Thread Jeff McKenna
As the conference committee chair I was thinking of an end of April 
release of the hosting-RFP (as Perry, it has been also on my mind, but 
Mar31st deadlines get in the way!).


jeff





Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:

Hey, Tim,

I was going to bring it up to the conference committee but you beat me 
to it.  You're absolutely right, of course, get the process started now 
so that the next year's host will have time to prepare.  Many of the big 
conference facilities need reservation almost a year in advance.  The 
earlier the location is selected the sooner the hosts can book a place.


-Perry

Tim Bowden wrote:

Ok, so we haven't even had this years conf, but given the time it takes
for a local chapter to organise a conf, I think it would be a good idea
to start the process for selecting the location for the 2008 conf.  If
all goes well, perhaps the 2008 conf location could be announced at the
closing session of foss4g2007?

Just a thought,
Tim Bowden

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
  


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




--
Jeff McKenna
DM Solutions Group Inc.
http://www.dmsolutions.ca
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Conf for 2008

2007-03-26 Thread Paul Ramsey
If you commit to a schedule now, that will give the teams time and 
MOTIVATION to start organizing themselves and figuring out things they 
need to know in advance of the request (what venues, what costs, what 
committee members, etc, etc).


For example:
- April 31, release RFP
- May 31, close RFP
- June 15, announce decision

There is nothing like ones imminent demise to focus the mind.

P

Jeff McKenna wrote:
As the conference committee chair I was thinking of an end of April 
release of the hosting-RFP (as Perry, it has been also on my mind, but 
Mar31st deadlines get in the way!).


jeff


Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:

Hey, Tim,

I was going to bring it up to the conference committee but you beat me 
to it.  You're absolutely right, of course, get the process started 
now so that the next year's host will have time to prepare.  Many of 
the big conference facilities need reservation almost a year in 
advance.  The earlier the location is selected the sooner the hosts 
can book a place.


-Perry

Tim Bowden wrote:

Ok, so we haven't even had this years conf, but given the time it takes
for a local chapter to organise a conf, I think it would be a good idea
to start the process for selecting the location for the 2008 conf.  If
all goes well, perhaps the 2008 conf location could be announced at the
closing session of foss4g2007?

Just a thought,
Tim Bowden

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
  


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss







--

  Paul Ramsey
  Refractions Research
  http://www.refractions.net
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Phone: 250-383-3022
  Cell: 250-885-0632
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Topology - Geography

2007-03-26 Thread nicholas . g . lawrence
I would describe the topological relationships as something like this;

region A connects to regions B, C  D
region B connects to regions A  E
region C connects to region A

and so on

And then the (hypothetical) tool would construct geometry that satisfies
the above topological relationships, whilst also being reasonably pleasing
to the eye. In this case five polygons or boxes, either bordering each
other, or maybe connected by lines.

nick



Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads,
Queensland Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or
endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
If you have received this electronic mail message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete the message
from your computer.


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss