[DNSOP] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/ -- COMMENT: -- This is the second ballot, diff from the previously approved version: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-11=draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12=--html Please see the ballot text for reasons. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/ -- COMMENT: -- [ Trying something new here -- adding commentary in my existing Yes ballot ] I'd like to thank the authors for responding to the ADs with DISCUSS positions - it looks like the replies and pull request address most of the comments. I'd also like to thank David Blacka for the useful DNSDIR review - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08-dnsdir-lc-blacka-2022-12-27/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec/ -- COMMENT: -- In general I try to include some background / context when putting documents up for IESG Eval, but in this case there isn't much that I can say that isn't already covered by the Abstract: --- Many enterprises today employ the service of multiple DNS providers to distribute their authoritative DNS service. Deploying DNSSEC in such an environment may present some challenges depending on the configuration and feature set in use. In particular, when each DNS provider independently signs zone data with their own keys, additional key management mechanisms are necessitated. This document presents deployment models that accommodate this scenario and describe these key management requirements. These models do not require any changes to the behavior of validating resolvers, nor do they impose the new key management requirements on authoritative servers not involved in multi signer configurations. --- ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] Warren Kumari's Recuse on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: Recuse When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale/ -- COMMENT: -- Recusing because I'm an author. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
