Re: [DNSOP] AS112 and IPv6
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Alfred HÎnes wrote: At Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:27:20 -0500 (EST), William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to generate a third draft specific to these issues? Nicely said. This indeed again raises the question where these drafts actually are. As I recall one had gone to WGLC, the other was pending. And *I* don't understand, actually; I thought they ought to have passed the IESG since months, but the datatracker does not even indicate "Publication requested". Where's the problem? I think it's still in limbo somewhere between the above. I know the WG Chairs were pretty apoloetic about their status about 18 months ago. wfms___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] AS112 and IPv6
At Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:27:20 -0500 (EST), William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: > ... > > Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path > to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to > generate a third draft specific to these issues? Nicely said. This indeed again raises the question where these drafts actually are. If we don't understand that, it is difficult to answer such questions. And *I* don't understand, actually; I thought they ought to have passed the IESG since months, but the datatracker does not even indicate "Publication requested". Where's the problem? Kind regards, Alfred. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] AS112 and IPv6
Greetings all, There's some light discussion on the as112-ops mailing list about whether or not AS112 should start doing a further two things: - start replying using IPv6 transport - amass more delegations for network blocks, like those enumerated in rfc5735. Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to generate a third draft specific to these issues? Thanks, wfms ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop