[Dovecot] Best authentication option

2007-05-02 Thread Eric
Dear Dovecot experts,
I have a small home server debian based, with postfix/dovecot/squirrelmail
installed locally and working. Dovecot is used non-secured (no imaps) but
only on the 192.168.0.100 address (address of the server on the local
network). I want to use squirrelmail to read my email from outside.
Squirrelmail can configured to access it in particular, either through
cram-md5 or login auths.
In that situation, is it better (I mean more secure) to use : 1) auth
mechanim = cram-md5 or 2) auth mechanism = plain (using PAM authentication
for dovecot) ? That will determine my dovecot configuration.

Thank you

Eric





Re: [Dovecot] Best authentication option

2007-05-02 Thread John Robinson

On 02/05/2007 12:13, Eric wrote:

Dear Dovecot experts,
I have a small home server debian based, with postfix/dovecot/squirrelmail
installed locally and working. Dovecot is used non-secured (no imaps) but
only on the 192.168.0.100 address (address of the server on the local
network). I want to use squirrelmail to read my email from outside.
Squirrelmail can configured to access it in particular, either through
cram-md5 or login auths.
In that situation, is it better (I mean more secure) to use : 1) auth
mechanim = cram-md5 or 2) auth mechanism = plain (using PAM authentication
for dovecot) ? That will determine my dovecot configuration.


What Squirrelmail can do doesn't matter, you need to get your web server 
using SSL, so your password is encrypted going over the 'net to get to 
your home server. Then you may as well use 2.


Cheers,

John.


Re: [Dovecot] Best authentication option

2007-05-02 Thread Gabriel Millerd

On 5/2/07, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thank you for your answer. What do you mean by you may as well use 2 ?
You mean both authentication options ? I though we have to decide in
dovecot.conf to use one option or another one...
I do force the use of my webserver (lighttpd) through https. My question
was the best option between plain/PAM and cram-md5 authentications
locally.


   the login information between squirrelmail and imaps could be
secured, but that communication is only occuring on the 'localhost'
typically you would only worry about imap communications when the
webserver and the imap server are not on the same machine. (as well as
when the smtp server is not) to protect the passwords on the wire.

  in the end http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAM-MD5 is superior
security to login-plain text

--
Gabriel Millerd