Re: [Dovecot] quick question about fs quota overhead in plugin

2007-11-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:26 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
> Last night I enabled imap_quota so dovecot could report usage reported
> by disk quota.  I don't intend to actually use the quota plugin to place
> any limits anytime soon though.  How much overhead does this add to 
> normal operations that allocate disk space?  Ideally I'd like a situation
> where the only overhead is incurred when the user uses the mail client to
> specifically check their usage.  Is that possible, and/or is there a better
> way to do this?  If it does cause general overhead on the NFS filer, I could
> just accept it until/unless I feel it becomes a burden I cannot bear.
> 
> mail_plugins = acl fts fts_squat quota imap_quota
> ...
> quota = fs
> ...

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/1d0521b7151d



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Dovecot] quick question about fs quota overhead in plugin

2007-11-28 Thread Adam McDougall
Last night I enabled imap_quota so dovecot could report usage reported
by disk quota.  I don't intend to actually use the quota plugin to place
any limits anytime soon though.  How much overhead does this add to 
normal operations that allocate disk space?  Ideally I'd like a situation
where the only overhead is incurred when the user uses the mail client to
specifically check their usage.  Is that possible, and/or is there a better
way to do this?  If it does cause general overhead on the NFS filer, I could
just accept it until/unless I feel it becomes a burden I cannot bear.

mail_plugins = acl fts fts_squat quota imap_quota
...
quota = fs
...