Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-12-05 Thread Eric Schulte
Sébastien Vauban  writes:

[...]
>>> I feel the same about the Babel "file" property.
>>> Maybe allowing such a specification line?
>>>
>>> #+BABEL sql: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d
>>> storeall -n -w 700 -s " "
>>
>> That seems like a good suggestion, the only question seems to be what is
>> the most natural syntax.
>>
>> I think I would lean more towards something like
>>
>> #+SQL_SOURCE:
>
> I don't really care about the form. I'll let you make the best choice, the one
> that best fits the whole Babel thing. Though, your proposition seems very
> adequate to me...
>

I've added this to our task list.

Cheers -- Eric

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-12-02 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Eric,

"Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> Thanks for the tip but... that may be a bit drastic, I mean forcing every
>> snippet of *every language* to behave like that:
>
> He Seb,
>
> Sorry I miss-typed, I meant the following which is exactly your
> suggestion below.
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args:sh '((:results . "output")))
> #+end_src

OK. Did not know that form did already exist...


>> I feel the same about the Babel "file" property.
>> Maybe allowing such a specification line?
>>
>> #+BABEL sql: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d
>> storeall -n -w 700 -s " "
>
> That seems like a good suggestion, the only question seems to be what is
> the most natural syntax.
>
> I think I would lean more towards something like
>
> #+SQL_SOURCE:

I don't really care about the form. I'll let you make the best choice, the one
that best fits the whole Babel thing. Though, your proposition seems very
adequate to me...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-12-02 Thread Eric Schulte
Sébastien Vauban  writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> Sébastien Vauban  writes:
>>> You're right that could be it. I often forget about adding that setting, 
>>> even
>>> though it's more or less mandatory for the sh blocks -- at least, in many sh
>>> blocks I write...
>>
>> You can specify this as the default header argument for all shell blocks
>> with the following.
>>
>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>>   (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args '((:results . "output")))
>> #+end_src
>
> Thanks for the tip but... that may be a bit drastic, I mean forcing every
> snippet of *every language* to behave like that:

He Seb,

Sorry I miss-typed, I meant the following which is exactly your
suggestion below.

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
  (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args:sh '((:results . "output")))
#+end_src

> I'm convinced it's the most natural choice for sh blocks, but maybe
> the less natural (i.e., must be overridden) for all other programming
> languages.
>
> In fact, I have the strong impression that we should need this on a language
> basis, something like:
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args '(
>(sh . (:results . "output"))
>(emacs-lisp . (:results . "value"
> #+end_src
>
> I feel the same about the Babel "file" property:
>
> #+BABEL: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d storeall
> -n -w 700 -s " "
>
> Not being able to specify the language these defaults apply to may rapidly
> lead to clashes... Or we have to set the default for the language for which we
> have the biggest number of chunks, and explicitly set the values for all the
> other snippets that are written in other languages.
>
> Maybe allowing such a specification line?
>
> #+BABEL sql: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d
> storeall -n -w 700 -s " "
>

That seems like a good suggestion, the only question seems to be what is
the most natural syntax.

I think I would lean more towards something like

#+SQL_SOURCE:

Best -- Eric

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-12-02 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Eric,

"Eric Schulte" wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban  writes:
>> You're right that could be it. I often forget about adding that setting, even
>> though it's more or less mandatory for the sh blocks -- at least, in many sh
>> blocks I write...
>
> You can specify this as the default header argument for all shell blocks
> with the following.
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args '((:results . "output")))
> #+end_src

Thanks for the tip but... that may be a bit drastic, I mean forcing every
snippet of *every language* to behave like that: I'm convinced it's the most
natural choice for sh blocks, but maybe the less natural (i.e., must be
overridden) for all other programming languages.

In fact, I have the strong impression that we should need this on a language
basis, something like:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
  (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args '(
   (sh . (:results . "output"))
   (emacs-lisp . (:results . "value"
#+end_src

I feel the same about the Babel "file" property:

#+BABEL: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d storeall -n -w 700 
-s " "

Not being able to specify the language these defaults apply to may rapidly
lead to clashes... Or we have to set the default for the language for which we
have the biggest number of chunks, and explicitly set the values for all the
other snippets that are written in other languages.

Maybe allowing such a specification line?

#+BABEL sql: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d storeall -n -w 
700 -s " "

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-12-01 Thread Eric Schulte
Sébastien Vauban  writes:

>
> You're right that could be it. I often forget about adding that setting, even
> though it's more or less mandatory for the sh blocks -- at least, in many sh
> blocks I write...
>

You can specify this as the default header argument for all shell blocks
with the following.

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
  (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args '((:results . "output")))
#+end_src

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-11-29 Thread Dan Davison


Sébastien Vauban 
writes:

> Hi Charles,
>
> Thanks a lot for taking a look at this, too...
>
> "Charles C. Berry" wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>>> Hi Eric and Dan,
>>>
>>> * Abstract
>>>
>>> Reporting two problems:
>>
>> Did you mean to include ":results output" in the headers?
>
> You're right that could be it. I often forget about adding that setting, even
> though it's more or less mandatory for the sh blocks -- at least, in many sh
> blocks I write...
>
>
>> When I do that in eaco of the src blocks I get what I think you were
>> expecting.
>
> I still don't. See below.
>
>
>>> 1. parsing problem of unescaped text from a shell block
>>> 2. end marker repeated upon execution of elisp block
>>>
>>> Note that I added the RESULT thing in my default headers.
>>>
>>> * Data
>>>
>>> Let's say I want to grep trough arbitrary text, such as:
>>>
>>> #+results:a-couple-of-lines
>>> : He said "I'll do it"
>>> : but that cannot be echo'ed!
>>>
>>> ... or to let it scanned by AWK for post-processing (like generating some
>>> DOT representation).
>>>
>>> But, first, as errors are popping up, let's say I can just output it as is.
>>>
>>> * Shell code
>>>
>>> #+begin_src sh :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
>>> echo "$data"
>>> #+end_src
>>>
>>> #+results:
>>> #+BEGIN_RESULT
>>> #+END_RESULT
>>
>> #+begin_src sh :results output :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
>> echo "$data"
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+results:
>> : He said "I'll do it"
>> : but that cannot be echo'ed!
>
> It does not work for me. With the above, I (still) get:
>
> #+results:
> #+BEGIN_RESULT
> #+END_RESULT
>
>
> for results, and, in the *Org-Babel Error Output*:
>
> sh: line 3: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
> sh: line 7: syntax error: unexpected end of file

Hi Seb,

Just to say that these blocks with embedded quotes are outputting OK for
me on linux, but I do see the second bug you mention (repeatedly adding
new lines on each execution). I'm guessing that the first one is a
difference in shell quoting behaviour between out operating systems.

Dan

>
>
>>> The data is impossible (*for me*, as is) to print out from a shell code.
>>> Though, it is in Emacs-Lisp... without any change.
>>>
>>> Note that it's the second *single quote* only that's causing a problem, not
>>> the first one...
>>>
>>> * Emacs-Lisp code
>>>
>>> Executing this:
>>>
>>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
>>> (prin1-to-string data)
>>> #+end_src
>>>
>>> #+results:
>>> #+BEGIN_RESULT
>>> #+begin_example
>>> "He said \"I'll do it\"
>>> but that cannot be echoed!"
>>> #+END_RESULT#+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>> #+end_example
>>>
>>> works, but the *end marker is repeated* as long as we re-execute the block.
>>
>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp results output :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports 
>> both
>> (prin1-to-string data)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+results:
>> : "He said \"I'll do it\"
>> : but that cannot be echo'ed!"
>
> With or without the ":results output" (BTW, notice you've forgotten the colon
> in front of results), the result is the same. But, if you evaluate the block
> multiple times, in my case, the end marker (end_example) is still repeated...
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-11-29 Thread Charles C. Berry

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Sébastien Vauban wrote:


Hi Charles,

Thanks a lot for taking a look at this, too...

"Charles C. Berry" wrote:

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Sébastien Vauban wrote:

Hi Eric and Dan,

* Abstract

Reporting two problems:


Did you mean to include ":results output" in the headers?


You're right that could be it. I often forget about adding that setting, even
though it's more or less mandatory for the sh blocks -- at least, in many sh
blocks I write...



When I do that in eaco of the src blocks I get what I think you were
expecting.


I still don't. See below.




[deleted]



#+begin_src sh :results output :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
echo "$data"
#+end_src

#+results:
: He said "I'll do it"
: but that cannot be echo'ed!


It does not work for me. With the above, I (still) get:

#+results:
#+BEGIN_RESULT
#+END_RESULT

for results, and, in the *Org-Babel Error Output*:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
sh: line 3: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
sh: line 7: syntax error: unexpected end of file
--8<---cut here---end--->8---




Hmmm. So it looks like 'sh' is having some trouble here.

Can you run the same code directly in the shell?

That is can you set/export $data and then 'echo $data' at the command line

[deleted]



#+begin_src emacs-lisp results output :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
(prin1-to-string data)
#+end_src

#+results:
: "He said \"I'll do it\"
: but that cannot be echo'ed!"


With or without the ":results output" (BTW, notice you've forgotten the colon
in front of results), the result is the same. But, if you evaluate the block
multiple times, in my case, the end marker (end_example) is still repeated...



Sorry 'bout the missing ":" - it outputs the same results either way on my 
box.


Chuck

[rest deleted]


Charles C. BerryDept of Family/Preventive Medicine
cbe...@tajo.ucsd.eduUC San Diego
http://famprevmed.ucsd.edu/faculty/cberry/  La Jolla, San Diego 92093-0901

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

2010-11-29 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Charles,

Thanks a lot for taking a look at this, too...

"Charles C. Berry" wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>> Hi Eric and Dan,
>>
>> * Abstract
>>
>> Reporting two problems:
>
> Did you mean to include ":results output" in the headers?

You're right that could be it. I often forget about adding that setting, even
though it's more or less mandatory for the sh blocks -- at least, in many sh
blocks I write...


> When I do that in eaco of the src blocks I get what I think you were
> expecting.

I still don't. See below.


>> 1. parsing problem of unescaped text from a shell block
>> 2. end marker repeated upon execution of elisp block
>>
>> Note that I added the RESULT thing in my default headers.
>>
>> * Data
>>
>> Let's say I want to grep trough arbitrary text, such as:
>>
>> #+results:a-couple-of-lines
>> : He said "I'll do it"
>> : but that cannot be echo'ed!
>>
>> ... or to let it scanned by AWK for post-processing (like generating some
>> DOT representation).
>>
>> But, first, as errors are popping up, let's say I can just output it as is.
>>
>> * Shell code
>>
>> #+begin_src sh :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
>> echo "$data"
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+results:
>> #+BEGIN_RESULT
>> #+END_RESULT
>
> #+begin_src sh :results output :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
> echo "$data"
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : He said "I'll do it"
> : but that cannot be echo'ed!

It does not work for me. With the above, I (still) get:

#+results:
#+BEGIN_RESULT
#+END_RESULT

for results, and, in the *Org-Babel Error Output*:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
sh: line 3: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
sh: line 7: syntax error: unexpected end of file
--8<---cut here---end--->8---


>> The data is impossible (*for me*, as is) to print out from a shell code.
>> Though, it is in Emacs-Lisp... without any change.
>>
>> Note that it's the second *single quote* only that's causing a problem, not
>> the first one...
>>
>> * Emacs-Lisp code
>>
>> Executing this:
>>
>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports both
>> (prin1-to-string data)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+results:
>> #+BEGIN_RESULT
>> #+begin_example
>> "He said \"I'll do it\"
>> but that cannot be echoed!"
>> #+END_RESULT#+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>> #+end_example
>>
>> works, but the *end marker is repeated* as long as we re-execute the block.
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp results output :var data=a-couple-of-lines :exports 
> both
> (prin1-to-string data)
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : "He said \"I'll do it\"
> : but that cannot be echo'ed!"

With or without the ":results output" (BTW, notice you've forgotten the colon
in front of results), the result is the same. But, if you evaluate the block
multiple times, in my case, the end marker (end_example) is still repeated...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode