RE: UL legal requirement

1999-09-19 Thread Grant, Tania (Tania)

Jeff,

Check the scope of UL1950/CSA950, 3rd edition harmonized standard and you
will find that a minimum voltage is not specified, just a maximum of 600 V.
Note that the standard is applicable to equipment connected to the mains
Therefore, your battery-operated camera and toys are O.K., but not O.K. if
there is a power cord connecting them to building mains power.  Then the
appropriate standards apply.

Tania Grant,   tgr...@lucent.com   
Lucent Technologies, Communications Applications Group


--
From:  Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Sent:  Friday, September 17, 1999 3:04 PM
To:  jbai...@sstech.on.ca
Cc:  emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:  Re: UL legal requirement




Hi Jeff:


>   I am trying to find a basic document from UL and or CSA regarding the
legal
>   requirement of 
>   UL or CSA listing.  I am thinking along the same lines as the European
LVD.
>   Can anyone 
>   offer insight as to whether this documentation exists?

UL and CSA are private organizations.  To my knowledge, 
neither has published any document describing how their
respective certifications are required by Federal, State,
County, and City laws.  I believe that both feel that 
such a publication would be out of place and rather
presumptive.

How the various laws invoke third-party certification has
been rather completely discussed in this forum from August
16 to August 19.  See:

http://www.rcic.com/

Click on:

Virtual Conference Hall

Click on:

Browse Recent EMC-PSTC Threads 

Click on:

Next 25 

until you get to August 19.  Then, click on:

U.S. National Product Safety "Laws" (18)

>   The real question is:  Is there a legal requirement to obtain UL or CSA
>   listing on a product 
>   that operates at a low voltage (below 50VAC or 75VDC), does not have a
>   circuit that would 
>   be classed as a TNV circuit, does not operate in hazardous explosive
>   environments, and
>   does not consume a high amount of power?  The product is also not
connected
>   to the mains
>   supply, it is specified to require power from a safety listed supply.

The answer to this question must be determined from the
NEC and from OSHA regulations.  

The NEC has regulations for low-voltage wiring installations
(Article 625).  So, if the product involves low-voltage 
building wiring, then it must be certified by UL or other
acceptable certification.  Since stand-alone (i.e., not a 
part of the building installation) low-voltage products are 
not addressed, then the NEC does not apply to such products.

Consequently, under the NEC, flashlights and similar battery-
operated products are not required to be certified.  
Furthermore, low-voltage products provided with an external 
power supply (adapter) need not be certified since the product 
is not part of the building installation.

I was unable to find anything under OSHA rules that implies
exemption of low-voltage products.


Best regards,
Rich



-
 Richard Nute  Product Safety Engineer
 Hewlett-Packard Company   Product Regulations Group 
 AiO Division  Tel   :   +1 858 655 3329 
 16399 West Bernardo Drive FAX   :   +1 858 655 4979 
 San Diego, California 92127   e-mail:  ri...@sdd.hp.com 
-





-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



1999 paper posted

1999-09-19 Thread Douglas C. Smith

Hi All,

I decided to post my 1999 IEEE EMC Symposium paper on magnetic field
probes, "Signal and Noise Measurement Techniques Using Magnetic Field
Probes," as well as the current probe paper. The 1999 paper provides
background for last month's Technical Tidbit on the paperclip probe.
The 1999 paper is a bit long (~600K) because of more graphic content.
It is much shorter that the nearly 2 Megabyte file on the CD-ROM that
was given out at the Symposium even though it has much better
resolution

Both papers can be found under "Technical Goodies for Download" near
the top of my index page at:

http://emcesd.com

Happy reading!

Doug

-- 
---
___  _   Doug Smith
 \  / )  P.O. Box 1457
  =  Los Gatos, CA 95031-1457
   _ / \ / \ _   TEL/FAX: 408-356-4186/358-3799
 /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \ Mobile:  408-858-4528
|  q-( )  |  o  |Email:   d...@dsmith.org
 \ _ /]\ _ / Website: http://www.dsmith.org
---



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Site up and paper posted

1999-09-19 Thread Douglas C. Smith

Hi All,

Well the servers at SiteAmerica are working again and my site is up (
http://emcesd.com )

I have uploaded my 1998 IEEE EMC Symposium paper "Current Probes, More
Useful Than You Think." It has lots of background information to
support this month's Technical Tidbit article on measuring voltages
with current probes. There is also information on making "differential
common mode" current measurements. The technique uses relative phase
information between two matched current probes to diagnose EMC
problems using a spectrum analyzer. The method of reading relative
phase information from the spectrum analyzer display and interpreting
the result are discussed in detail.

Look under "goodies for download" or there is also a link from the
current probe article this month.


Doug

-- 
---
___  _   Doug Smith
 \  / )  P.O. Box 1457
  =  Los Gatos, CA 95031-1457
   _ / \ / \ _   TEL/FAX: 408-356-4186/358-3799
 /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \ Mobile:  408-858-4528
|  q-( )  |  o  |Email:   d...@dsmith.org
 \ _ /]\ _ / Website: http://www.dsmith.org
---



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



hp 141T's

1999-09-19 Thread Lou Gnecco

Group: A comment on the old hp 141T series of spectrum analyzers, that
someone (probably someone like me) recently suggested: 

We have some and I like them, BUT:

a) They are no longer supported by hp and some of the parts are no longer
even  available.

b) If you are going to get one, you'd better be willing to spend a lot of
time getting very familiar with the manual and learning how to repair and
align it yourself. It will be hard to find someone that is competent to work
on it.

c) Treat it carefully. Old equipment can last a long time, or it can break
down tomorrow, depending on how it was used or abused before you got it.
With these, it is specially easy to blow the mixer or the front end. A lot
of the "idiot proofing" safeguards that are built into modern computerized
equipment, (and that we now take for granted) do not exist in the old stuff.

d) Know who you are dealing with. Old equipment like this comes with either
NO WARRANTY or 30 days at most. You could easily end up with an expensive
door stop. Try explaining that to your boss after bragging about how much
money you just saved! 

e) If you are outside the US, forget about it. You will have a hard time
getting it into your country. There is no "CE" mark on this equipment, and
never will be.

f) If I were working for the government or for a big company, I wouldn't get
one of these at all. It would be too hard to justify it to the many layers
of non technical people that get involved, specially later, when you have to
spend twice what it cost to get it fixed. Sometimes this actually makes
sense with old sequipment, but you'll never be able to explain that to the
bean counters! :) 

I would only get one if I worked for a small company with an understanding
boss that had a lot of money and a real love of equipment. Also a sense of
humor. 

Regards,
Lou





-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).