Re: [E-devel] Eterm-0.9.3 + deadkeys not working right ?
This may or may not be useful, but with altivec you can print the
vector registers as such:
(gdb) p $v1
$1 = {
uint128 = 0x7fffdead7fffdead7fffdead7fffdead,
v4_float = {nan(0x7fdead), nan(0x7fdead), nan(0x7fdead), nan(0x7fdead)},
v4_int32 = {2147475117, 2147475117, 2147475117, 2147475117},
v8_int16 = {32767, -8531, 32767, -8531, 32767, -8531, 32767, -8531},
v16_int8 = \177?\177?\177?\177?
}
(gdb)
MMX/SSE may be similar, but others can probably provide better info.
On 5/10/05, Tres Melton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you know how to get gdb to display the contents of a xmm
register on AMD64 in hex? info all-registers and variants only show
the values as floats. (The registers are shared between the SSE and x87
stuff but I'm not using x87). And I tried gdb ver. 6.0-r1 in Gentoo,
6.3 from gnu.org and the latest cvs.
--
Tres
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393alloc_id=16281op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Eterm-0.9.3 + deadkeys not working right ?
On Monday, 09 May 2005, at 20:33:33 (-0400), Mike Frysinger wrote: i'm hoping someone out there can help since i'm really not familiar with deadkeys at all ... basically, after upgrading eterm from 0.9.2 to 0.9.3, this user's deadkeys stopped working properly. downgrading libast to 0.5 and then building eterm 0.9.3 against that seemed to have no effect This has already been discussed here and fixed in CVS. See my March 15th ChangeLog entry. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- Who needs women? Give me gcc and a couple megs of source code, and I'm good for at least an hour or so --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393alloc_id=16281op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Eterm-0.9.3 + deadkeys not working right ?
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 03:03 pm, Michael Jennings wrote: On Monday, 09 May 2005, at 20:33:33 (-0400), Mike Frysinger wrote: i'm hoping someone out there can help since i'm really not familiar with deadkeys at all ... basically, after upgrading eterm from 0.9.2 to 0.9.3, this user's deadkeys stopped working properly. downgrading libast to 0.5 and then building eterm 0.9.3 against that seemed to have no effect This has already been discussed here and fixed in CVS. See my March 15th ChangeLog entry. yep, that did the trick alright, thanks :) for any other distribution maintainers, you can grab the patch which applies against 0.9.3 here: http://viewcvs.gentoo.org/x11-terms/eterm/files/eterm-0.9.3-deadkeys.patch -mike --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393alloc_id=16281op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Eterm-0.9.3 + deadkeys not working right ?
On Tuesday, 10 May 2005, at 20:35:38 (-0400), Mike Frysinger wrote: for any other distribution maintainers, you can grab the patch which applies against 0.9.3 here: http://viewcvs.gentoo.org/x11-terms/eterm/files/eterm-0.9.3-deadkeys.patch Please note that only the last hunk of this patch corrects the deadkeys issue. The other hunks are needed to correct the saving of the cut_chars attribute. They're really 2 separate patches; they were just committed at the same time. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- I believe God's grace is so incredible that He saves those who so much as grunt in His general direction, as long as it is from their heart.-- Rick Durrance, Youth Pastor, Wilmore UMC (paraphrased) --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393alloc_id=16281op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Eterm-0.9.3 + deadkeys not working right ?
i'm hoping someone out there can help since i'm really not familiar with deadkeys at all ... basically, after upgrading eterm from 0.9.2 to 0.9.3, this user's deadkeys stopped working properly. downgrading libast to 0.5 and then building eterm 0.9.3 against that seemed to have no effect http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91878 -mike --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393alloc_id=16281op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Eterm-0.9.3 + deadkeys not working right ?
Mike / Tobias, I don't use deadkeys myself, being American and only speaking programming languages, but after a few minutes of Googling I would guess that it started here: Commit by mej :: eterm/Eterm/ (ChangeLog configure.in): Mon Apr 18 16:00:22 2005 Michael Jennings (mej) Remove unused NO_XLOCALE crap and do it right. and in configure.in: # check if we need X_LOCALE definition AC_CHECK_LIB(X11, _Xsetlocale, AC_DEFINE(X_LOCALE, , [X locale.]), AC_DEFINE(NO_XLOCALE, , [No X locale.])) # For multibyte selection handling #if test $MULTICHAR_ENCODING != none; then AC_CHECK_LIB(Xmu, XmuInternAtom) #fi and from the XFree86-4.3.0 Changelog: http://www.hupo.org.cn/docs/linuxdoc/XFree86-4.3.0/CHANGELOG 952. A more complete set of dead accent/space compose sequences, add Multi_key slash for letters with a stroke, and add some combos for exponent characters, katakana voiced sounds, etc to the en_US.UTF-8 compose file (#5646, David Monniaux). The bottom line is that a X_LOCALE needs to be specified so that things know what to do with deadkey sequences. The same sequence can generate different things in different locations. I would ask what X_LOCALE is set to and try changing it. You (Mike) know more about this automagical crap than I but I'd bet money (a little) that the problem is related to MeJ's change on 18 April 2005. Hope that helps. BTW, do you know how to get gdb to display the contents of a xmm register on AMD64 in hex? info all-registers and variants only show the values as floats. (The registers are shared between the SSE and x87 stuff but I'm not using x87). And I tried gdb ver. 6.0-r1 in Gentoo, 6.3 from gnu.org and the latest cvs. -- Tres --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393alloc_id=16281op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
