Re: Travelling to a different universe

2001-12-24 Thread jamikes



Dear Saibal, you misunderstood my post. I did 
not ask about "technicalities" of your sci-fi, 
I simply suggested that you may not "play" to 
get from here to there, but are "here" by a play 
from "over there". Simply humor, nothing 
else.
John

  
  
  I don't see why one would want to go back, 
  but there are still copies left in ordinary universes, there are universes in 
  which the probability to win will return to normal after a while. One should 
  thus be able to go back using a suicide machine. Also one could use memory 
  erasure to go back.
   
  Saibal
   
  John Mikes wrote:
  
SNIP


Re: Error in "Refinements to my model" try it again

2001-12-24 Thread H J Ruhl

A correction to my model corrected:

Near the end it should say:


>Evolving universes must be isomorphic to a portion of

one of these successive manifest counterfactuals.  It is not required that 
a particular universe always be isomorphic the counterfactual at a given 
level of the nesting.  Such a requirement would be a vast correspondence 
table of information that can not [should not] be in the Everything.

>   The nesting would allow an infinite number of such universes.


Hal




Re: Error in "Refinements to my model"

2001-12-24 Thread H J Ruhl

A correction to my model:

Near the end it should say:


>Evolving universes must be isomorphic to a portion of

one of these successive manifest counterfactuals.  It is not required that 
it always be the same one.

>   The nesting would allow an infinite number of such universes.


Hal




Re: Travelling to a different universe

2001-12-24 Thread Saibal Mitra




I don't see why one would want to go back, but 
there are still copies left in ordinary universes, there are universes in which 
the probability to win will return to normal after a while. One should thus be 
able to go back using a suicide machine. Also one could use memory erasure to go 
back.
 
Saibal
 
John Mikes wrote:

  
  OK, Saibal Mitra, you won. Are you happy 
  now? Can you ever go back?
  John Mikes
  
Suppose that every week I subject myself to a suicide 
experiment. I use a suicide machine to win that weeks lottery. 
After a few years I will have won hundreds of times in succession. 

 
Now there exists a class of universes, with a very 
 low measure, in which the laws of physics are such that I am 
guaranteed to win. The probability that I find myself in such a universe 
will have increased substantially after each experiment. After a few 
years I will be sure to live in such a universe. It would be easy to check, 
all I would have to do is to buy a ticket and see if I have won without 
using the suicide machine. 
 
Saibal


Re: Travelling to a different universe

2001-12-24 Thread Saibal Mitra

Some people will sell one of their kidneys for just a few thousand dollars.
If I were a multi-multi-multi-billionaire I should be able to buy a kidney
for me after the operation.

George Levy wrote:
>
>
> > Saibal Mitra wrote:
> >
> > Suppose that every week I subject myself to a suicide experiment. I
> > use a suicide machine to win that weeks lottery. After a few years I
> > will have won hundreds of times in succession.
> >
> > Now there exists a class of universes, with a very  low measure, in
> > which the laws of physics are such that I am guaranteed to win. The
> > probability that I find myself in such a universe will have increased
> > substantially after each experiment. After a few years I will be sure
> > to live in such a universe. It would be easy to check, all I would
> > have to do is to buy a ticket and see if I have won without using the
> > suicide machine.
> >
> > Saibal
>
> Actually such universes are not too difficult to imagine. For example
> you could end up in a universe where you have a secret admirer in the
> lottery office, ie, the person who is programming the computer to
> generate the winning numbers and who has been arranging the outcome of
> the lottery to be in you favor. This person is a jilted lover who has
> never lost her love for you, and has decided that if she disturb your
> life enough by showering you with riches you might get a divorce from
> your wife and get back together with her. As it turns out she has a
> child who, unknown to you, was born after the torridly passionate affair
> you had with her while you were in college. The child is sick and the
> only cure is a transplant which can be provided only by a close
> relative. Her blood type made that transplant impossible but since your
> are type "O" you are the only person in the whole world who could save
> that child. So brace yourself Saibal, you are about to lose a kidney for
> the benefit of this newly found relative of yours. Oops but wait, there
> is an element of doubt as to whether you are the real father... Should
> you sacrifice yourself for the child of maybe another? Well, you are
> still in love with your previous girlfriend. So what should you do?
>
>
> By the way, this universe does not feel as if it has a low measure... It
> is just as arbitrary as the universe we live in now.
>
> George
>





Re: Travelling to a different universe

2001-12-24 Thread Saibal Mitra

I had the set of all possible universes in mind. But, as I wrote earlier (in
August), the set of all possible universes is contained in the MWI. The
reason is that there is a nonzero probability that you are be simulated by a
computer. This computer could run any program.

Saibal


Charles Goodwin wrote:

> I can't see this. For one thing, you can't 'travel' to other universes
with
> different laws of physics, at least not according to the MWI. More to the
point,
> assuming quantum suicide works, you will find yourself in one of the sheaf
of
> universes which has split off from the one you started in. This is true
anyway,
> according to MWI, but if you also use quantum suicide you limit your
existence
> to a small subset of that sheaf (the subset in which you won the lottery,
for
> example). Since you only experience universes which are physically
possible
> continuers of the universe you started in, you keep the same laws of
physics.
> So - you can't journey to a universe in which the laws of physics are X by
using
> quantum suicide to select versions of yourself for which X is true; you
can only
> limit your existence to universes in which X happens to be true.
>
> Always assuming that quantum suicide actually works (as Larry Niven
said
> about the matter transmitter which destroys you at point A and creates a
perfect
> copy at point B, "I wouldn't ride in the damn thing").
>
> Charles
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Saibal Mitra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "everything" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "FoR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 2:48 AM
> Subject: Travelling to a different universe
>
>
> > Suppose that every week I subject myself to a suicide experiment. I use
a
> suicide machine to win that weeks lottery. After a few years I will have
won
> hundreds of times in succession.
> >
> > Now there exists a class of universes, with a very  low measure, in
which the
> laws of physics are such that I am guaranteed to win. The probability that
I
> find myself in such a universe will have increased substantially after
each
> experiment. After a few years I will be sure to live in such a universe.
It
> would be easy to check, all I would have to do is to buy a ticket and see
if I
> have won without using the suicide machine.
> >
> > Saibal
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
> Access Your PC from Anywhere - Full setup in 2 minutes - Free Download
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/1GUySC/E6eDAA/ySSFAA/pyIolB/TM
> -~->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>