Re: [Evolution-hackers] today's evolution userdocs update.
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 21:34 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Unfortunately, this passed my make distcheck and our QA's build sanity > test won't capture this, which sort of made it difficult to catch it > before the release. I've added an xmllint test to help/Makefile.am, so "make distcheck" should catch this sort of thing in the future. Wouldn't hurt to run "make check" after each userdoc commit either. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] today's evolution userdocs update.
Updated tarball at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/evolution/2.22/evolution-2.22.3.1.tar.gz Unfortunately, this passed my make distcheck and our QA's build sanity test won't capture this, which sort of made it difficult to catch it before the release. -Srini. On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:29 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Dear Evolution Team. > > Thanks for not testing the integrity of the changed userdocs file. > Thanks for removing too much markup, though required to compile. > Thanks that this means 2.22.3 does not compile out of the box, see > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540918 . > Thanks for not testing the tarballs you release. It's not the first > time. > Thanks for getting the docs update committed to svn 5 hours before > tarballing, so no translators could update their translations. > Again, thanks for not proofreading anything in evolution.xml - thanks > for keeping the error rate constant, and people in work. Translators > love to update their translations frequently everytime you commit some > spelling fixes and introduce some new ones. > > I'm pretty fed up with wasting my time and repeating the same stuff > over and over again, and getting answered that it won't happen again. > > Now one may come up with other conclusions, but Novell IS capable to > handle the user docs. I was told that in > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435942#c41 . That is a good > feeling that lets me sleep warm and comfortable, without any worries. > > So long, and thanks for all the fish. > > Yours sincerely, > andre ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] today's evolution userdocs update.
Dear Evolution Team. Thanks for not testing the integrity of the changed userdocs file. Thanks for removing too much markup, though required to compile. Thanks that this means 2.22.3 does not compile out of the box, see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540918 . Thanks for not testing the tarballs you release. It's not the first time. Thanks for getting the docs update committed to svn 5 hours before tarballing, so no translators could update their translations. Again, thanks for not proofreading anything in evolution.xml - thanks for keeping the error rate constant, and people in work. Translators love to update their translations frequently everytime you commit some spelling fixes and introduce some new ones. I'm pretty fed up with wasting my time and repeating the same stuff over and over again, and getting answered that it won't happen again. Now one may come up with other conclusions, but Novell IS capable to handle the user docs. I was told that in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435942#c41 . That is a good feeling that lets me sleep warm and comfortable, without any worries. So long, and thanks for all the fish. Yours sincerely, andre -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
