RE: Move Server questions

2001-08-19 Thread Kevin Miller

What is the plan you are using to move the servers?

Kevinm WLKMMAS*TM, QWSZC, VRY+Y, NFH, SAD-VF, DERSDESDFG
~~~
More letters after my name makes me Smarter.
~~~
please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 6:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Move Server questions


Never needed to do it.  There are two articles by Tony Redmond in
Windows 200 Magazine (or the Exchange Administrator journal - I don't
remember which they were published in) on the subject.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: Move Server questions


What, not a single person on this list has used the Move Server wizard?
Is Ed on vacation this week?  I haven't seen any posts from him;  he
usually responds to my inquiries.  Lori, Daniel, Missy, Martin, Bueller,
Bueller, Bueller?

-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move Server questions


I will performing my first Move Server Wizard (multi-server site to
multi-server site)in the next month or so and I have a couple questions.
I was reading some TechNet docs and one of them specifically talks about
moving from site to site.  The author says that the client won't have to
recreate their profile because the server name isn't changing.  But in
my lab tests this was not the case; Outlook was unable to connect and
gave some warning about the mailbox being unavailable.  I redid the
Check Name in the profile and then it was fine, but it still required
manual intervention.  I read in another doc somewhere that you WOULD
have to recreate the profile. Does anyone know for sure?

Also, the same TechNet article recommends removing the Site and DR
connectors.  I don't want to do that because then I would lose all of my
inter-site members in each DL, not to mention lots of NDRs, etc.  But I
read another article that said to leave the connectors intact (but
obviously not hosted on the server being moved).  My lab tests worked
fine with the connectors left in place.  Why would he be recommending to
do that in the first place?

Comments, complaints, suggestions?

Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Move Server questions

2001-08-19 Thread missy koslosky

Never needed to do it.  There are two articles by Tony Redmond in Windows
200 Magazine (or the Exchange Administrator journal - I don't remember which
they were published in) on the subject.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: Move Server questions


What, not a single person on this list has used the Move Server wizard?  Is
Ed on vacation this week?  I haven't seen any posts from him;  he usually
responds to my inquiries.  Lori, Daniel, Missy, Martin, Bueller, Bueller,
Bueller?

-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move Server questions


I will performing my first Move Server Wizard (multi-server site to
multi-server site)in the next month or so and I have a couple questions.  I
was reading some TechNet docs and one of them specifically talks about
moving from site to site.  The author says that the client won't have to
recreate their profile because the server name isn't changing.  But in my
lab tests this was not the case; Outlook was unable to connect and gave some
warning about the mailbox being unavailable.  I redid the Check Name in the
profile and then it was fine, but it still required manual intervention.  I
read in another doc somewhere that you WOULD have to recreate the profile.
Does anyone know for sure?

Also, the same TechNet article recommends removing the Site and DR
connectors.  I don't want to do that because then I would lose all of my
inter-site members in each DL, not to mention lots of NDRs, etc.  But I read
another article that said to leave the connectors intact (but obviously not
hosted on the server being moved).  My lab tests worked fine with the
connectors left in place.  Why would he be recommending to do that in the
first place?

Comments, complaints, suggestions?

Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Open Relay

2001-08-19 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE

Or "Link Survivor"

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 10:38 AM
To: ExchangeList@swynk
Subject: RE: Open Relay


When Good Links go BadNew FOX special!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 5:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Open Relay


It's 'gone bad'?

The Joseph Neubauer one from Technet, right?  It's also in this article:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696

Others: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q199/6/56.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q196/6/26.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q193/9/22.ASP

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+



-Original Message-
From: John Martinez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/18/01 6:52 PM
Subject: Open Relay

The Open Relay link on the web is bad now. Does anyone know where the
article has moved to?

John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Open Relay

2001-08-19 Thread Martin Blackstone

When Good Links go BadNew FOX special!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 5:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Open Relay


It's 'gone bad'?

The Joseph Neubauer one from Technet, right?  It's also in this article:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696

Others: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q199/6/56.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q196/6/26.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q193/9/22.ASP

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+



-Original Message-
From: John Martinez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/18/01 6:52 PM
Subject: Open Relay

The Open Relay link on the web is bad now. Does anyone know where the
article has moved to?

John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Open Relay

2001-08-19 Thread Lefkovics, William

It's 'gone bad'?

The Joseph Neubauer one from Technet, right?  It's also in this article:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696

Others:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q199/6/56.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q196/6/26.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q193/9/22.ASP

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+



-Original Message-
From: John Martinez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/18/01 6:52 PM
Subject: Open Relay

The Open Relay link on the web is bad now. Does anyone know where the
article has moved to?

John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]