RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.

2003-03-06 Thread Fabrig, Amado
Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe that.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: March/06/2003 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.

Isn't that what I said?  Let me rephrase:

You must run ADC if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5
site in order to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information.  There is
no choice in this circumstance.  ForestPrep will not run in this
situation without the ADC having been installed.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.


So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep?

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.

And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are
joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange
5.5 site information.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.


Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book...

   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away,
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we
are all Downwinder's...


-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep.



I'm reading the "Six step Case Scenario" from Microsoft dated June 2002,
and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I
run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party
vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that
I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do
this. Any thoughts


   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away,
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we
are all Downwinder's...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe

RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.

2003-03-06 Thread Fabrig, Amado
So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep?

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.

And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are
joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange
5.5 site information.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.


Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book...

   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away,
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we
are all Downwinder's...


-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep.



I'm reading the "Six step Case Scenario" from Microsoft dated June 2002,
and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I
run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party
vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that
I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do
this. Any thoughts


   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away,
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we
are all Downwinder's...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Cannot start IMS please help

2002-06-27 Thread Fabrig, Amado

Have you checked the event viewer to find out the exact error?

-Original Message-
From: Fabian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: June 27, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot start IMS please help

I cannot start Internet Mail Service a statement comes out saying the the
service was unable to start or control at a timely fashion. can anybody
help me. Thank you

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam

2002-01-15 Thread Fabrig, Amado

I'm using emanger from trend.

> -Original Message-
> From: Irfan Malik [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15-Jan-02 6:42 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  Anti-Spam
> 
> Dear List,
> 
> How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000.
> 
> Thanks in Advance
> Irfan.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: number of recipients

2001-12-21 Thread Fabrig, Amado

Yes, check this KBase Q126497. I hope this helps you. 

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: number of recipients

There are some users in my company who utilize a program that enables the
user to place multiple recipients in Outlook (as many as 4-5000).  Aside
from the fact that I hate the application, user's don't realize the
ramifications that it can have, not to mention, the nastygrams that we've
received from other companies for blasting over 2000 2mb attachments to
them.
Is there a way to restrict the number of recipients a user can sent to in
Exchange 5.5?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Urgent , space is full very fast

2001-09-20 Thread Fabrig, Amado

do you have the delete retentation on? 

> -Original Message-
> From: Adil Azad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 5:22 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  Urgent , space is full very fast
> 
> Hello!
> I am running WinNT4 SP4and Exchange server 5.5 with
> SP4 . 25 Clients are using mail boxes. Before two days
> my exchange server are very slow and mails are not
> forward perfectly when i am check the services i see
> that most exchange server services are stoped
> automatically. When i check the c drive free space it
> is less than 10MB  but in few minutes this free space
> is full and my exchange server is stop.I am uninstall
> some applications to this drive and use ESEUTIL and
> the defragmentation is completed successfully. Now i
> am installing my applications in other drive but again
> today my c drive space is decreasing very fast .
> Can anyone help me , i am very worry about this
> situation.
> 
> regards
> Adil azad
> 
> __
> Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
> Donate cash, emergency relief information
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Server locking up...flat line.

2001-08-30 Thread Fabrig, Amado

we had a similar problem. the only thing that we did was ran Optimizer and
upgrade to SP4. So far we haven;t had any problem.


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:24 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  Re: Server locking up...flat line.
> 
> I would try setting some Performance Monitors on the server so you can see
> if anything odd happens leading up to the crash (if it recurs).  The only
> time I can recall something similar to that happening was when a
> fledgeling (engineer) tried to send a 2Gb Ghost Image file across a
> cc:Mail connector.  Locked up the VDM but good.  Thank God I don't have to
> deal with that garbage any more.
> 
> >  Original Message ---
> > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:26:09 -0400
> > 
> > Exchange 5.5 SP5
> > 
> > Well twice today our server hung.  Went over to the console and it would
> > not
> > respond.  Keyboard was locked and no response.  I had to power cycle the
> > system to get it back up and each time there is nothing in the event
> logs.
> > I wanted to get everyone's opinion as to where to start on this thing.
> Is
> > this more indicative of a hardware issue?
> > 
> > 
> > Pete Pfefferkorn
> > University of Cincinnati
> > Center For Information Technology Services
> > Title:  Senior Network Support Specialist
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Phone:  (513) 556-9076
> > Fax:(513) 556-2042
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Code red

2001-08-20 Thread Fabrig, Amado

have you applied the security patch?

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:56 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  OT: Code red
> 
> anyone have an idea that has been working with code red?
> 
> I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard drives,
> re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within about 10 minutes
> I
> was infected again according to the w3svc log and the symantec scanner for
> code red.
> 
> disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a
> floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner at:
> www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes there as
> well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever attached to the
> network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec
> scanner says I am infected again.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> -
> I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
> they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
> finals...
> -
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???

2001-08-17 Thread Fabrig, Amado

The reason he mentioned "nbtstat -R" because he created a HOST file and
everytime you do that it needs to purge/reload the cache table to make sure
that there's no entry in there that are identical.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:32 PM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> What does doing an nbtstat have to do with looking at netbios cache, isnt
> nbtstat all netbios resolutions, I dont think it has anything to do with
> dns???
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Morrison
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:49 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> All I can tell you, Rick (notwithstanding your place of employment), is
> that
> when we were having DNS issues, Outlook didn't work very well. It would
> take
> at least 2 or 3 minutes for it to open, and quite often navigating between
> inbox folders experienced the same delay. WINS was working fine, and
> pinging
> servers by name was no problem. When I created a HOSTS file with the
> Exchange server names in it and did an "nbtstat -R", Outlook behaved just
> fine. Of course, once DNS was fixed, things were fine as well. WINS and
> NetBios did come into play, but only after DNS resolution timed out and
> failed.
> 
> Mike Morrison
> NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Boza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:23 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> Chunky Monkey here.
> 
> I think you'll find Outlook struggles more than a little bit without
> being able to resolve NetBios names.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> I'll take a double scoop of Cherry Garcia please.
> 
> 
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Mike Morrison
> NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the
> last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> WINS.
> 
> If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS
> is
> preferred)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Guy Stewart III
> > 305-213-7637
> > MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc.
> > http://www.mymycomputerguy.com
> >
> >
> > I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four
> > users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook
> 
> > 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect
> > via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a
> > gateway/router). One
> > of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a
> > local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins
> > server and or
> > a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the
> > exchange server's name to an I/P address.
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: 

RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???

2001-08-17 Thread Fabrig, Amado

yes it would.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:34 PM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
>How about if you have wins configured on the box, will it queery
> netbios to
> resolve the server before dns ??
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 6:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> If you #PRE tag the Lmhosts entrys then they will get read before DNS or
> HOSTS, since they'd already be loaded in the NetBios Cache Table.
> 
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:20 AM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>5.5 doesn't care how the client resolves the name. Only the
> >>>client cares,
> >>>and Outlook uses DNS (or HOSTS) first.
> >>>
> >>>Mike Morrison
> >>>NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> >>>Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Rick Boza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:13 AM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>With 5.5 the client needs to resolve the NetBios name.
> >>>
> >>>Easy to check, run "nbtstat -a Server_Name"  Note the "a"
> >>>must be lower
> >>>case in this command syntax.
> >>>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking
> >>>LMHOSTS is the
> >>>last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no?
> >>>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> >>>
> >>>WINS.
> >>>
> >>>If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an
> >>>LMHOSTS file (WINS
> >>>is
> >>>preferred)
> >>>
>  -Original Message-
>  From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM
>  To: Exchange Discussions
>  Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Guy Stewart III
>  305-213-7637
>  MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc.
>  http://www.mymycomputerguy.com
> 
> 
>  I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server.
> >>>There are four
>  users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server
> >>>via outlook
> >>>
>  98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have
> >>>internet connect
>  via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a
>  gateway/router). One
>  of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange
> >>>(this is a
>  local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins
>  server and or
>  a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the
>  exchange server's name to an I/P address.
>  _
>  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  _
>  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>  _
>  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >>>
> >>>_
> >>>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>_
> >>>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>To u

RE: Unable to connect to exchange server from outlook 97

2001-08-17 Thread Fabrig, Amado

Have you checked the host file? make sure there's nothing there that's
pointing to the wrong IP address.



> -Original Message-
> From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:04 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  Unable to connect to exchange server from outlook 97
> 
> 
> Hi guys
> 
> We have exchange server 5.5 and outlook 97 as client. This morning some
> user's email froze in the process of sending a mail. I have deleted the
> exchange profile on one of the user's pc, now I am not able to connect to
> exchange to add a profile for the user. I have tried it on another pc but
> without success. The hour glass comes up and it is there indefinitely, I
> have checked the event log on the server but cannot find any error
> messages.
> There is both internal and external mail flow for others.
> 
> Please help
> 
> 
> With best regards
> Sabi Kassim-Momodu
> User\Network Support Analyst
> 
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you receive this message in error, please notify
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]