[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-30 02:54:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I suggest to add Require: libxml++-devel to synfig-devel subpackage, otherwise > synfigstudio won't build (pkg-config fails in mockroot due to missing > libxml++-devel) That's odd -- it worked for me, in rhel-5. But thanks for the suggestion, I'll add this in the next spin of the package, which is after I get a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483205] New: Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=169234&use_mirror=&filename=eclipse-SystemTapGui.spec&51805119 SRPM URL: https://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=169234&use_mirror=&filename=eclipse-SystemTapGui-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm&66576057 Description: This package contains eclipse plugins which provide an IDE and a visualization perspective for the systemtap scripting language. This requires the SystemTapGui server to be installed in order to run the SystemTap scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:43:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Lucian Langa changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2009-01-30 01:43:00 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: faf236290f222df013198cb0e9cb8555 gsql-0.2.1.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is not silent. gsql.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql.schemas gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql-plugins.schemas gsql-engine-mysql.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql-engine-mysql.schemas -Safe to ingore gsql.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libgsql.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_vte.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_runner.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_exporter.so gsql-engine-mysql.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/engines/libgsqlengine_mysql.so -Safe to igore as package uses g_load_module to load this so files. OK final provides and requires are sane: gsql-0.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsql.so.0()(64bit) gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh GConf2 desktop-file-utils gsql-engine-mysql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtksourceview-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) gsql-devel-0.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libgsql) = 0.2.1 gsql-devel = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-devel(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 pkgconfig gsql-engine-mysql-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsqlengine_mysql.so.0()(64bit) gsql-engine-mysql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-engine-mysql(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlengine_mysql.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libmysqlclient_r.so.16()(64bit) gsql-plugins-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsqlplugin_exporter.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_runner.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_vte.so.0()(64bit) gsql-plugins = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-plugins(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_exporter.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_runner.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_vte.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libvte.so.9()(64bit) OK %check is not present;
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:42:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:40:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:39:48 EDT --- If you look at rawhide you'll see it's perfectly possible to have one of the font subpackages named like the srpm (and in fact this is what the main gentium package is going to do) srpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts rpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts sil-gentium-basic-fonts-common sil-gentium-basic-book-fonts (or sil-gentium-book-basic-fonts if you insist, would make it harder for reporters to find the right bugzilla component associated to the package)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:39:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:37:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:34:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:35:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:31:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:30:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:27:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:26:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:17:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |banshee-extension-mirage - |banshee-mirage - An |An Automatic Playlist |Automatic Playlist |Generation Extension for|Generation Extension for |Banshee |Banshee Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:21:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:19:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:16:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-01-30 01:12:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092737 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 24ff349f0e2e09ca89e8ecbc73b0dc65 MooseX-Daemonize-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=82, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 1.91 cusr 0.26 csys = 2.19 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Daemonize-0.08-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Daemonize) = 0.08 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Core) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid::File) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::WithPidFile) = 0.01 perl(Test::MooseX::Daemonize) = 0.03 perl(Test::MooseX::Daemonize::Testable) Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid::File) perl(MooseX::Getopt) perl(MooseX::Getopt::OptionTypeMap) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(POSIX) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-01-30 01:08:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092739 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 03fa0ad2a50e18598d91f197924fb54d Sane-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=323, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.00 sys + 0.27 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-Sane-0.02-2.fc11 => Provides: Sane.so perl(Sane) = 0.02 perl(Sane::Device) perl(Sane::Status) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libdl.so.2 libexif.so.12 libgphoto2.so.2 libgphoto2_port.so.0 libieee1284.so.3 libjpeg.so.62 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libsane.so.1 libusb-0.1.so.4 perl >= 0:5.008005 perl(Exporter) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-01-30 01:03:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092744 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8f9e6ba2595b07997efac1377c5484e9 XML-Generator-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=132, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Generator-1.01-3.fc11 => Provides: perl(XML::Generator) = 1.01 perl(XML::Generator::DOM) = 0.2 perl(XML::Generator::DOM::util) perl(XML::Generator::cdata) perl(XML::Generator::comment) perl(XML::Generator::final) perl(XML::Generator::overload) perl(XML::Generator::pi) perl(XML::Generator::pretty) perl(XML::Generator::util) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(XML::DOM) perl(XML::Generator) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483187] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/kde-plasma-weather.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/kde-plasma-weather-0.0-0.2.fc9.20090130svn.src.rpm Description: A plasmoid showing weather reports and forecasts. Note: You need KDE 4.2 to build and/or test this. Scratch build for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|peter...@redhat.com |nicolas.mail...@laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #21 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-29 23:59:33 EDT --- I used the general name because there are families named 'basic' and 'book-basic' within this package. So changing the name in the suggested way would make the subpackages' name 'sil-gentium-basic-basic-fonts' and 'sil-gentium-basic-book-basic-fonts'. If that is fine, I would change the name as per the suggestion in Comment 19 and 20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-01-29 23:36:11 EDT --- "the user experience must be provided only by free tools". goes with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview "Fedora is all about freedom and rapid innovation." it goes against fedoras goals of "Fedora will always be free for anybody, anywhere, to use, modify and distribute." not having iverilog in means that ovm is only available to a subset of people who have access to the closed proprietary tools. We want you to get this in, all we are asking is to provide a way for everyone to use the content. even if for now its limited in functionality. Our intention is not at all to keep this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504
Bug 478504 depends on bug 479921, which changed state.
Bug 479921 Summary: Directory ownership problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479921
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|FAILS_QA|ON_QA
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #26 from Ant Bryan 2009-01-29 23:08:15
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > error: File not found by glob:
> > /home/tuxdistro/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py*
>
> Sorry, the files are named gget-epiphany.py* and gget.ephy-extension.
> So you could use
> %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget-epiphany.py*
> %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.ephy-extension
> or simply
> %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget*
> as you did before.
Ok.
> > Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1308934
> > SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.src.rpm
>
> Ok, I will have a final look over them tonight and if everything is ok approve
> them. Leave the files as they are now and do the final fixes in the -7
> release.
Alright, I'll do the -7 release after your comments.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #44 from Eric Christensen 2009-01-29 22:39:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > The point I was trying to get at is that you have the conditional but then the > desktop file just uses htmlview anyway. ;-) Yeah, I'm not sure why it is in there but it might be another "feature" that I'd have to break. Doesn't look like it is going to hurt anything. > I suggest starting by copying the .desktop to a file (Source1) and including > that in the srpm. Oh! Okay, that's been done and the source tgz has been uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 22:10:35 EDT --- The point I was trying to get at is that you have the conditional but then the desktop file just uses htmlview anyway. ;-) I suggest starting by copying the .desktop to a file (Source1) and including that in the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483079] Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-29 21:21:50 EDT --- cannot mock build for the moment, due to ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/root/ update http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2 from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483074] Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-29 21:21:01 EDT --- cannot mock build for the moment, due to ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/root/ update http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2 from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 21:16:45 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and cleaned up the %setup -c. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1263 New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-doulos-fonts Short Description: Doulos SIL fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-29 21:12:50 EDT --- I see no relation between "If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK to be packaged in Fedora" and "the user experience must be provided only by free tools". Would iverilog be nice to have? Definitely yes. Should its presence at the same time with OVM be mandatory ? Absolutely not. Users might be using EDA software from other sources. Actually I bet that 99% percent of them are using commercial tools and I also bet that in an enterprise environment they always will. In the company I work for we use several commercial EDA tools. Since July 2008 the number of engineers interacting with OVM increased from 2 to 25 and their number will increase in the future [, depending on the projects that end / new projects that start]. How would not the presence of OVM in a repository enhance these users' experience ? As sysadmin I would definitely have preferred to do "yum install ovm.el4" instead of "tar xzf ovm-2.0.tar.gz" For what it's worth and completely unrelated, we have a very small team of courageous people who use gtkwave from EPEL when the number of licenses for the commercial tool is insufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 20:59:58 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and added more description for GentiumAlt. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1262 New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: SIL Gentium fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-01-29 20:50:24 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content "If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK to be packaged in Fedora." that is why we said that we would like to have iverilog or some other tool for using the content in at the same time. understanding that the tools still have a way to go and are far from feature complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |sil-gentium-fonts - |sil-gentium-basic-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389
manuel wolfshant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-29
18:42:20 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:GPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 7fe731f15a97fc0a926a145bc48c2b42cc1d10fb
beesu-2.1.tar.bz2
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
not needed, it's a wrapper
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Final Notes ===
1. You should also make it parallel make compliant. Fortunately the program
builds in a couple of secs so it's not a big deal.
*** APPROVED *** under the condition that spot will be the Fedora maintainer
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-29 18:24:06 EDT --- review under way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-01-29 18:23:29 EDT --- AFAICS this shouldn't block l2fprod-common but only tvbrowser or am I missing something? Anyway, even if this blocks l2fprod-common - we know upstream is willing to change the license. Can we maybe continue with the review in the meantime (i.e. get it ready to approve it as soon as the legal issue is fixed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-29 18:16:00 EDT --- I suggest to remove the first paragraph of the description. The description tag cannot refer to anything but the chordii package, hence "This is a description of a utility called chordii." is redundant. The starting phrase of the second paragraph should be modified accordingly, for instance "The purpose of chordii is to provide guitar players with [...]" Please examine if the build process can take advantage of compiling in parallel on several processors ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make ) If the program doesn't build with it, please add a comment otherwise please use it. It would also be a good idea to also add INSTALL="install -p" to the make line, this should preserve the timestamps of the man pages. Please also take a look at the Makefile, according to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1092213&name=build.log the manpages are installed twice. It's not critical now but, if I am not mistaken, patching the Makefile in order to remove the redundant lines (if this is the case) would be a good idea. Did you submit any other packages ? Or maybe you have performed some pre-reviews ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:12:29 EDT --- emacs-magit-0.7-3.20090122git.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-magit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:12:15 EDT --- crda-1.0.1_2009_01_15-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:11:50 EDT --- libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.2.beta.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libnss-pgsql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1186 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:12:06 EDT --- pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pidgin-privacy-please'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1188 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:08:13 EDT --- shcov-4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shcov'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:18 EDT --- sugar-connect-22-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-connect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:34 EDT --- portmidi-131-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update portmidi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:10:53 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:06:44 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc9, qzion-0.3.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:58 EDT --- vhybridize-0.5.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vhybridize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1153 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Milos Jakubicek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-01-29 18:08:05 EDT --- Thanks for a fast review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: torch Short Description: Torch is a simple machine-learning library Owners: mjakubicek Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:08:03 EDT --- opencsv-1.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:37 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:09:00 EDT --- backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update backup-manager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:11:15 EDT --- botan-1.8.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:08:16 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.10.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:28 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:08:01 EDT --- vhybridize-0.5.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update vhybridize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:10 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:08:33 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:06:47 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc9, qzion-0.3.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:09:08 EDT --- opencsv-1.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481567] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:42 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Async-0.07-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-MooseX-Async'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-01-29 18:02:52 EDT --- - Does the .def file really need to be bundled in this package? (IOW, do other packages require this file?) - The gtk-doc should be removed from this package (as was discussed at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-January/000357.html ) - %defattr(-,root,root) needs to be changed to %defattr(-,root,root,-) Other than that, no serious issues with this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:00 EDT --- libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.2.beta.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libnss-pgsql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1095 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:02:09 EDT --- shcov-4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update shcov'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1089 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:05:03 EDT --- pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pidgin-privacy-please'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1118 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:05:09 EDT --- python-libasyncns-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-libasyncns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:05:37 EDT --- cmconvert-1.9.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cmconvert'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-29 18:05:52 EDT --- Has been built a while ago -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:06:03 EDT --- botan-1.8.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:06:18 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:04 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:02:26 EDT --- msp430-binutils-2.19-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:02:49 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:55 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:04:49 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:01:58 EDT --- mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:18 EDT --- mingw32-glib2-2.19.5-2.1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:04:55 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.10.beta4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:00:08 EDT --- purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update purple-msn-pecan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1063 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:00:48 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-Safe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:01:15 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:00:41 EDT --- backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update backup-manager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:01:37 EDT --- sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-imageviewer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:00:18 EDT --- purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update purple-msn-pecan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-29 17:33:15 EDT --- After talking with bee (the upstream maintainer), I'm taking this over and I will be maintaining this upon inclusion: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/beesu-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/beesu.spec Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092095 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-01-29 17:12:42 EDT --- fixed in Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator-1.01-3.fc10.src.rpm i checked that the tests did infact complete sucessfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rooz...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 17:07:11 EDT --- 1. probably better to use -n with %setup instead of using -c and playing mv games 2. Please consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Am_I_done_after_creating_a_new_fonts_.28sub.29package_or_renaming_an_existing_one.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F However, despite the uglyness associated to 1., the package and upgrade path works. ⬕⬕⬕ APPROVED ⬕⬕⬕ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-01-29 17:10:23 EDT --- cleaned up in -13 package commited to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
