[Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-03 02:50:00 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090403-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 --- Comment #8 from Philip Withnall 2009-04-03 02:25:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > It only seems to test two things, but that's better than testing nothing. If > you agree, please consider this approved and add something like that when you > import the package. None of the test programs are particularly comprehensive yet, but I do plan to improve their coverage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-03 02:26:40 EDT --- SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/links.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/links-2.2-5.fc11.src.rpm + NSS support Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274783 Anyone to review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-03 01:44:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274696 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ibus-table-erbi.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402/AUTHORS ==> can be fixed by removing AUTHORS file. + source files match upstream url 5b36a300b07cb6eb74be84f74ae63a4b ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ibus-table-createdb scriptlet used. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: 1) Drop AUTHORS files from %doc as rpmlint message reported as ibus-table-erbi.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402/AUTHORS 2) try adding contents to Changelog file in upstream and add it as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488172] Package Review: ibus-table-zhengma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-03 01:43:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274694 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5981da2341988d13ebd0c6c01bcb047f ibus-table-zhengma-1.1.0.20090402.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ibus-table-createdb scriptlet used. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: 1) check header of zhengma.txt table file. Can you confirm license with upstream if it really is GPLv3+? 2) try adding contents to Changelog file in upstream and add it as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492231] Review Request: trac-watchlist-plugin - plugin for watching trac wiki pages and tickets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492231 --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley 2009-04-03 01:27:28 EDT --- Oh, and the 0.1 version came from setup.py - I didn't just pull it from mid-air :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492231] Review Request: trac-watchlist-plugin - plugin for watching trac wiki pages and tickets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492231 --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2009-04-03 01:24:01 EDT --- Upstream is really bad about versioned releases for trac plugins. But I see your point, I was following the post-release snapshot guidelines, assuming that the first version ever published was the 0.1 "release". A "release" per se is unlikely to ever occur for this package, so it will be forever a pre-release I guess. New spec: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-watchlist-plugin.spec New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-watchlist-plugin-0.1-0.2.svn5357.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #3 from arthurguru 2009-04-03 00:55:16 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback, changes have been applied and the package is ready for another review. The same links apply (wasn't sure whether I should up the release number and break the links in the original description, so I left them as they are). Changes I made: Removed that superfluous license blurb inside the spec file. Removed the BuildArch: directive. Added the dist tag to the Release: directive. Tested ok, rpmlint is still content. Looking forward to your feedback. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 --- Comment #2 from Bernard Johnson 2009-04-03 00:11:21 EDT --- Thanks Xavier * Thu Apr 02 2009 Bernard Johnson - 0.6.3.1-2 - remove slashes in %%files list - configure with --disable-static Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libmkv.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libmkv-0.6.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Deji Akingunola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Deji Akingunola 2009-04-02 23:45:15 EDT --- I am sorry for the delay, I failed to notice you posted the correct link (drowned in a load of other mails at the time). REVIEW: - GOOD: package name according to guidelines - GOOD: spec file named properly - GOOD: license acceptable (LGPLv2+) and COPYING.LIB file shipped as documentation - CHECK: Most of the source codes doesn't include and license header at all - GOOD: the spec file is written in good English - GOOD: the spec file is legible - GOOD: download URL works - GOOD: source tarball is the same as from md5sum: 47d54b9d5d48dc6aa1f6d7e506c72ba7 iaxclient-2.1beta3.tar.gz - GOOD: builds in mock for x86_64/Rawhide - GOOD: all build dependencies (currently available in Fedora) listed - PASS: no locale files - GOOD: post and postun scriplets properly called for the libraries shipped - GOOD: all shipped files and directories owned by package - GOOD: permissions on files are set properly - GOOD: package has a %clean section - GOOD: package uses macros consistently - GOOD: the package contains code, not content - PASS: no large documentation files - GOOD: %doc doesn't affect runtime - GOOD: header files properly shipped in -devel subpackage - PASS: no static libraries - GOOD: pkgconfig file properly shipped in -devel subpackage - GOOD: no *.la libtool archives - GOOD: desktop file is installed properly in %install - GOOD: doesn't own files or directories owned by other packages - GOOD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install - PASS: Seems to consistently follow some tcl specific guidelines, which I cannot locate on the wiki - CHECK: rpmlint warning on the iaxclient binary as in comment #5 is still there. Since its a warning and I'm not sure what it means, I'll let it pass. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493750] New: Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 Summary: Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lut...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/netcf/download/netcf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/netcf/download/netcf-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A library for modifying the network configuration of a system. Network configurations are expresed in a platform-independent XML format, which netcf translates into changes to the system's 'native' network configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|lkund...@v3.sk |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(johnhf...@gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-02 17:46:47 EDT --- SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/links.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/links-2.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Most issues addressed, apart from SSL support (which is in works) and warnings. Anyone please continue this, since the submitter doesn't seem to respond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-02 15:46:54 EDT --- OK, this looks good now. However, given that Philip indicates that we can run the general test without network access, I think we should do it. This works for me: %check # Only the general test can be run without network access cd gdata/tests ./general It only seems to test two things, but that's better than testing nothing. If you agree, please consider this approved and add something like that when you import the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946
--- Comment #8 from Mat Booth 2009-04-02 14:55:22 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> When I build this srpm I see a lot of File listed twice warnings.
> %doc is supposed to be a path in the source archive, e.g.
> %doc %{eclipse_dropin}/dltk-core/eclipse/epl-v10.html should become
> %doc org.eclipse.dltk.core-feature/rootfiles/epl-v10.html
> I think that is the last issue I see.
Aha, thanks for the tip.
> Otherwise the package is working great. I'm even using if for development of
> next shelled :).
Cool, a version of shelled based around the DLTK is a great idea.
Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk-1.0.0-0.3.M5.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(loupgaroubl...@gm ||ail.com) --- Comment #35 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-02 14:55:28 EDT --- ghc-X11 won't build on F-10, i think because of macro errors. We'll need an updated ghc for this. Meanwhile, users can just pull packages from rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274046 @Till, i'll have a look at your patches later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:22:25 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-4.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:22:30 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:20:59 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update subtitlecomposer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.07-2.fc10 |0.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|20070815-4.fc10 |20070815-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:17:11 EDT --- slv2-0.6.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slv2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:20:21 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xml2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:20:09 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:15:12 EDT --- kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-style-skulpture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492110] Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.2.2-6.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.01-4.fc9 |1.01-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:15:17 EDT --- k3guitune-1.01-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:12:24 EDT --- libQGLViewer-2.3.1-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #34 from Till Maas 2009-04-02 13:14:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > This includes both a start-xmonad and an xmonad-session script. The former > will > check for a config file or copy a config file over. The latter will call a > user's .xsession and then start start-xmonad. There are also .desktop files > for both, and both should be installed in the correct location. Let me know > if > this works for you. I did not ttest the xsession stuff, but with my patch it works: http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad_7-8.spec.diff I wrote a simple config that is stored in /etc/skel/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, that opens the manpage using xterm. > Currently, the default config is the default config provided by upstream. > Should we convince upstream to have it load the manpage on startup? If this can be done easily within xmonad, why not. But I guess if xmonad would open the manpage by default, there would be no easy way to stop it doing this using a xmonad.hs currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:16:21 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update subtitlecomposer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492110] Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:15:38 EDT --- mingw32-libsigc++20-2.2.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490462] Review Request: rpmorphan - List the orphaned rpm packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490462 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:13:59 EDT --- rpmorphan-1.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:13:05 EDT --- unzoo-4.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:10:28 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update frescobaldi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:13:23 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update frescobaldi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.3.1-7.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490462] Review Request: rpmorphan - List the orphaned rpm packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.4-5.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.01-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:12:44 EDT --- libdwarf-0.20090324-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.20090324-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:11:42 EDT --- k3guitune-1.01-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:11:35 EDT --- rumor-1.0.3b-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rumor'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:11:26 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update xml2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc1 ||0 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.07-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:10:02 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:10:15 EDT --- dfu-util-0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493684] New: Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Summary: Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkund...@v3.sk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-20080411-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Compact version of Clearlooks theme, especially great on small screens like the Eee PC, or for intense applications like Eclipse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-02 12:47:27 EDT --- Upstream notified about the Version and License issues by mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-02 12:19:14 EDT --- I was building against EL-5 where the rt version is 3.6, while Fedora has 3.8, and 3.8 is changing the place where the files are installed. I think this package will need more work. Anyway, even with 3.6 the files installed under /usr/local/lib/rt3 are probably a problem and I'll need to talk with Ralf about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #40 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-02 11:50:36 EDT --- @Michael Schwendt Ok, I move Fedorian flags after autors, so, if dupes present, system wide will override. It is correct? Or I must use fully only system-defaults flags here? (In reply to comment #36) > Message catalogue .mo file for Chinese Simplified should be > installed under "zh_CN", not "zh_cn". Ok. I assume it is author error. I correct that. Thank you. @Philipp Macros %install provide explicit many default system flags, in this list also --prefix=/usr. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-2.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-02 11:24:31 EDT --- BTW how about building ghc-X11 for F10 - it would make testing easier for more people I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #42 from Gratien D'haese 2009-04-02 10:39:10 EDT --- Note to myself before requesting CVS access: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.20-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.20-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-02 09:57:13 EDT --- @Philipp: Run "rpm --eval %configure|less" in your favourite terminal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-02 09:45:35 EDT --- will you please check if Requires: lines are really needed in this package? For perl packages dependencies are automatically resolved at time of their installation using yum. Only those dependencies that yum fails to pick/resolve are needed to be explicitly added in spec file as Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #27 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-02 09:36:07 EDT --- In the source rpm (.src.rpm) I put again the original tar file (parrot-1.0.0.tar.gz). The URL of the SRPM remains the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493638] New: Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Summary: Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekc...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kcometen4/kcometen4.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kcometen4/kcometen4-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: KCometen4 is an OpenGL KDE screensaver. Inside a box is a nifty light show that features lightning and exploding comets. It lets you configure various effects like comet behavior, camera movement, box face images, etc. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1273244 $ rpmlint kcometen4-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm kcometen4-1.0.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm kcometen4-debuginfo-1.0.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-02 08:52:51 EDT --- Ok. CC list, if I want to put in this package under the aegis of my own ownership, will it require a fresh review, or can I essentially self-approve this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-02 08:51:04 EDT --- Ok, that sounds reasonable. I'll await fixes and/or commentary once the new branch is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-02 08:48:26 EDT --- Ah. There isn't. APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-04-02 08:35:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 3) you don't need following .. > Requires: perl(Test::More) This dependency is wrong - It must be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084 Jan F. Chadima changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-04-02 08:29:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: medusa Short Description: parallel brute forcing pasword cracker Owners: jfch Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493603] New: Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Summary: Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensou...@till.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/unclutter.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/unclutter-8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unclutter hides the mouse cursor when it is not moved for a specified amount of time. It will be restored it once it is moved again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name Alias||unclutter-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Philipp Hagemeister changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@phihag.de --- Comment #38 from Philipp Hagemeister 2009-04-02 08:23:12 EDT --- Additionally, shouldn't the default prefix /usr/local be changed to /usr ? Just calling configure with --prefix=/usr should suffice for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-02
08:03:48 EDT ---
When I build this srpm I see a lot of File listed twice warnings.
%doc is supposed to be a path in the source archive, e.g.
%doc %{eclipse_dropin}/dltk-core/eclipse/epl-v10.html should become
%doc org.eclipse.dltk.core-feature/rootfiles/epl-v10.html
I think that is the last issue I see.
Otherwise the package is working great. I'm even using if for development of
next shelled :).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 --- Comment #6 from Mat Booth 2009-04-02 06:26:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Mat, > What do you think about dropping the gcj_support? > It is giving us nothing as eclipse itself is compiled without it. > And benefits for us will be a lot simpler spec file, faster compilation, > noarch > packages and etc. I don't have a problem with dropping GCJ support. (Though I don't think it made the spec too much more complicated ;-) ) In these days of stronger, better, faster JDKs, are AOT bits desired in any Java package? If not, we probably ought to change the guidelines. [1] However, try this one on for size: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk-1.0.0-0.2.M5.fc10.src.rpm [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-02 05:02:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review it is being built :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #26 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-02 04:38:25 EDT --- I modified the spec-file and build the source rpm (.src.rpm) again. The URLs for this latest files are still the same: Spec: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/SRPMS/parrot-1.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm - take the parrot source in .src.rpm from svn-revision 37835 - add commands to reduce output of errors when using rpmlint - define RPM_PAR_LIB_DIR added The scratch builds with "koji" from Fedora 8 to Fedora 11 still finished successful, the URLs are: f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272316 f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272363 f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272424 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272461 Although "rpmlint" output of parrot rpms writes a lot of errors. I place the output of rpmlint under a directory with the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/rpmlint The most errors occurs because parrots build system is for different operation systems und use explicit calls to execute scripts. I think this should not aviod the review. Would anyone of the Fedora rpm experts say my if rpmlint errors should still reduced or if it does not matter? P.S. I have holiday until 8th April and go on a trip. So I will not look and work at this before the 9th April. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-02 04:18:43 EDT --- My fault, the auto-completion of my browser said i searched for urlwtch. :-( sorry jussi... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489929] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review request: libHBAAPI |Review request: libhbaapi - ||SNIA HBAAPI library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489929] Review request: libHBAAPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Jan Zeleny changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #16 from Stjepan Gros 2009-04-02 03:40:10 EDT --- Sorry for not letting you know, but I wont be able to do much until summer. Feel free to take this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-02 03:31:01 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272284 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 87fb75627801e323f7bc4430c3c97334 Data-Dumper-Names-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.05 sys + 0.15 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.24 CPU) + Package perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Data::Dumper::Names) = 0.03 Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) perl(PadWalker) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Please change %description. See what description mean http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Summary_and_description 2) Summary should be "Dump variables with names" 3) you don't need following Requires: perl(PadWalker) >= 0.13 Requires: perl(Test::More) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-02 03:09:31 EDT --- Thanks for explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-02 03:13:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-PlRPC Short Description: Interface for building pServer Clients Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-02 03:13:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Log-Trace Short Description: A unified approach to tracing Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-02 03:08:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272115 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5361e137e56d037c5e796926ecb5300b PlRPC-0.2020.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. + Package perl-PlRPC-0.2020-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Bundle::PlRPC) = 0.03 perl(RPC::PlClient) = 0.2020 perl(RPC::PlClient::Comm) = 0.1002 perl(RPC::PlClient::Object) perl(RPC::PlServer) = 0.2020 perl(RPC::PlServer::Comm) = 0.1003 perl(RPC::PlServer::Test) = 0.01 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(IO::Socket) perl(Net::Daemon) perl(Net::Daemon::Log) perl(Net::Daemon::Test) perl(RPC::PlClient::Comm) perl(RPC::PlServer) perl(RPC::PlServer::Comm) perl(Storable) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-02 03:11:38 EDT --- ah sorry forgot to remove make test checkitem from above review as there is no make check for this package used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
