[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-26 17:48 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rsibreak Updated Fedora CC: Rex Dieter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Please make him co-maintainer. This review is used for this procedure because it was stated to do so: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-20 19:43 EST --- Thank you very much for the help and the sponsorship! Here are the build-logs: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&uid=11320 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&uid=11318 Close as next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-19 22:00 EST --- Source0 is actually http://www.rsibreak.org/images/e/e2/Rsibreak-0.7.1.tar.bz2, but checks out anyway. Still approved, and sponsored. Go ahead and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-19 18:22 EST --- We'll see, but thank you for helping. Anyway, today the new version of rsibreak was released, here is the newest spec file and srpm, I updated the changelog (new version, changed my e-mail to the one used here) as well as the package path (to the new version) and version. Also some of the icon files were moved to other directories (from %{_datadir}/icons/ to %{_datadir}/apps/rsibreak/icons) upstream so I corrected the pathes there, to. The new files can be found here: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/rsibreak.spec http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/rsibreak-0.7.1-1.src.rpm The old spec file can be found here: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/rsibreak.spec.release1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-19 14:29 EST --- I worked with an admin on IRC to get to the bottom of this and everything should be moving now. John, the sponsorship request should be in your mailbox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-17 17:28 EST --- I have already applied for sponsorship, but as stated in Bug 187818, my account role status is described as "in progress", the Sponsor field says "unneeded", and I can't add myself to the cvsextras group. I will post here again as soon as this problem is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-14 15:54 EST --- - rpmlint checks return clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file There really is not a much better rpm group. APPROVED I'll sponsor if still needed, apply for cvsextras. Note that when the package builds you can inform the rsibreak authors about the Extras package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review