[filmscanners] Re: NikonScan doesn't see my LS-4000ED

2002-07-13 Thread James Grove

Er, i just thought i would add that the ASPI layer wont help you get your
LS-4000ED to work as it is Firewire only, unless i have missed something in
this thread, if i have then i apologise.

Cheers

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.planet-images.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:12 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: NikonScan doesn't see my LS-4000ED


You can get ASPI from Adaptec's web site.

Don

- Original Message -
From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:58 pm
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: NikonScan doesn't see my LS-4000ED

> Usually, if NikonScan can't see a scanner, it's because there's no
> ASPIlayer loaded. ASPI used to be included with Windows, but newer
> versions have
> replaced it with something else. If you have an older version of
> Easy CD
> Creator, or Adaptec EZ SCSI, then you can install the ASPI layer,
> and the
> scanner should spring to life.
>
> --
>
> Ciao,   Paul D. DeRocco
> Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---
> -
> Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
> message title or body
>



Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body





Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body



[filmscanners] Re: Image archiving and managing software

2002-07-10 Thread James Grove

I use Fotostation Pro V4.5 if you have 1`s of images then you can add
index manager to it, Fotostation Pro is around 500 UK Pounds, its baby
sister FotoStation 4.5 is also available, See

www.fotostation.com

www.fotoware.com


Both are superb programs for storage and offer a whole host of functions.

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.planet-images.com
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Zabrovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Image archiving and managing software


Hi all.
After I finally established by image processing and archiving PC system,
it's time to get some nice and useful image archiving and managing software
to keep track of my image database and easily manageable archive.
I would be grateful to anyone advising on this point.
My system consist of:
PC running Win2000 Pro.
Scanners: Nikon LS40.
Image scanning software - NikonScan ver 3.1.2 used as TWAIN through PS7.
Image editing software - PS7.

The strategy I was considering as follows:
1. All archiving-worth images are stored in JPEG format (after PS tweaking
is necessary and resizing). The file size - up to 200k per image.

2. High-quality images from above, potentially intended for future printing
and enlargement -
   scanned at 12 bit/pixel resolution (up to ~60 MB file) tweaked in PS (if
necessary)
   while keeping track of PS editing done to this particular image (for
reversibility if
   if possible).
   Images are stored as either TIFF 16 bit or PSD files.

The achieve will be stored on local HDDs, back up on remote (USB2.0
accessible) HDD and CDs.

Your comments are welcome.




Regards,
Alex Z



Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body





Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body



RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT

2001-12-19 Thread James Grove

You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run the
regsweep utilitity in the Utils folder of that versions download, then
install the new version after reboot.

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Enoch's Vision,
Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
Sent: 19 December 2001 19:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC


> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt 
> must bookmark nikontech BTW... you mentioned ages ago that you 
> weren't having hassles on a dual processor after doing a fresh 
> install(am i right?) of w2k and then installing NS just for your 
> info... last week i reformatted and did a completely fresh install of 
> w2k also installed NS 3.1.1 but too terrified to try it :) Now 
> that i've downloaded 3.1.2 i don't know what to do... uninstall 3.1.1 
> or over install? How did you go about it?


So far I've successfully avoided reinstalling Win2K. I just don't have
the time to reinstall all my apps, re-do the performance tweaks and
whatnot. I've done a lot of performance hacks in the registry and don't
want to repeat all those either. 

You can often refresh a Win2K installation by: 1) reinstalling major
device drivers; 2) reinstalling the latest version of IE plus any
associated Service Packs; and 3) refreshing system files by running the
command "SFC /Scannow" from a Command Prompt window. Those were the only
steps that I took to correct problems in my Win2K installation. So far,
it's been running since March 2000 without needing to be reinstalled.

The newest version of NikonScan no longer requires you to uninstall the
earlier version. Just extract the files, run Setup and you're done. 

Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
http://www.enochsvision.com -- "Behind all these manifestations is the
one radiance, which shines through all things. The function of art is to
reveal this radiance through the created object." ~Joseph Campbell







RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

2001-12-19 Thread James Grove

I`ll clear up the situation for Nikon Scan V3.1.2 before I get accused
of distrubuting virus`s. OK 2 weeks ago V3.1.2 of Nikon Scan and the new
Xp Driver set were posted on the Japanese Web Site.

Nikon Euro are usually the first to do the conversion. However around
three days ago I noticed that the US Digital site had the files on them.
I left it, yesterday I grabbed them, I posted them on my site and on my
ftp server for everyone to get because:

Nikon only have one site in the world with the english files on,
If you don't have DSL or ADSL or Leased Line it will take you forever to
get the files
Nikon limit the output in K/Sec from th site.

I am fed up with the lack of CS from Nikon with reference to Digital
products. Nikon Scan V3.1.2 is working much better for me under XP,
however if I prescan the LS-40 still does 2 passes?

If you want the files then point your browser to

www.jgrove.dynodns.net

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt
Sent: 19 December 2001 16:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC



- Original Message -
From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC



> It's there. Honest it is: http://www.nikontechusa.com/Scan3_12.htm
>
> I just checked again, 7:45 EST -- I kid you not. I clicking on the 
> link even as I write this and it's asking me to save the file. I got 
> it and installed it last night. Works fine so far (Win2K/SP2). I 
> scanned three slides last night and NS 3.12 didn't crash (yet).

:)

i don't doubt you for a moment :) have it now.. it's just that i
read James' post and went in to www.nikon.com and from there tried just
about every link... as i said... about an hour? including searches...
and just couldn't find it... must bookmark nikontech BTW... you
mentioned ages ago that you weren't having hassles on a dual processor
after doing a fresh install(am i right?) of w2k and then installing
NS just for your info... last week i reformatted and did a
completely fresh install of w2k also installed NS 3.1.1 but too
terrified to try it :) Now that i've downloaded 3.1.2 i don't know what
to do... uninstall 3.1.1 or over install? How did you go about it?

Cheers...

SD


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 11/12/2001






filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 HERE

2001-12-19 Thread James Grove


For those that cant get it via HTTP or FTP it available from my site.
Here

http://www.jgrove.dynodns.net


-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573




RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

2001-12-18 Thread James Grove

V3.1.2 has been available in Japan for a week. The Driver file for XP is
the same as in previous versions but the Scan software is different.
Today it appeard without warning in English on the Nikon USA Tech site.

Glad I could help. I just wish the software was more stable.

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt
Sent: 18 December 2001 18:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC



"James Grove" wrote to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC


> Hi Folks,
>
> At last Nikon Scan V3.1.2 With XP Compatibility also for the MAC

Where on earth did you find it?  in the UK section 3.1.1 is still
the only version available. dated Nov 20, 2001

Cheers...


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 12/12/2001






filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

2001-12-18 Thread James Grove


Hi Folks,

At last Nikon Scan V3.1.2 With XP Compatibility also for the MAC

Available from me or from Nikon

FTP To 

62.31.210.174 Port 21 Using nikon as username and password.

DO NOT use your browser and do NOT use passive mode, sorry but my
firewall wont allow it.

Cheers


-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573




filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2

2001-12-14 Thread James Grove

I have seen at the Japan web site a newer Nikon Scan

See

http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/ei_cs/swdown/index.htm

I can see a XP Fix? But it appears only to be an INF file change for the
LS-4000 and 8000 users not the LS-40?

Cheers

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573




RE: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan IV - positioning

2001-11-27 Thread James Grove

I don't think it makes any difference but I had mine on its side, and
now I have put it the logo way up.

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Otway
Sent: 27 November 2001 09:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan IV - positioning



Hi all,

Quick, and possibly dumb, question: all of the pictures I've seen of the
LS-40 have shown it stood on its side - i.e., with the 'Nikon' logo at
the correct orientation, and the power light at the top. However, I note
that it has rubber feet on the 'side', implying that it can also be used
'flat' (with the film strip going in 'on-edge', so-to-speak. 

The latter would suit my desk layout better, but will it affect the
scanner's performance in any way? Is there an optimal position, or will
it make no difference?

Thanks

Mark





RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update

2001-11-21 Thread James Grove

Hi,

Sorry about the trouble with my site, my ISP has been messing
about with there systems today making the networking snail pace. I am
glad you got the file in the end.

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Otway
Sent: 21 November 2001 16:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update



I managed to download the update, but with great difficulty. Nikon's
site was limited to 7k/s, and didn't have resume enabled, making the
15Mb download difficult on my 56k connection with a 1hour timeout. ;-) 

James Grove's site was faster (thanks James) but still no resume, so I
got a mate with a 'fat pipe' to download it for me and whack it onto a
resumable FTP. A while (!) later, I have it installed and running, on
XP, with the 1.10 firmware update installed on the scanner too.

First thing to note is that the annoying message has gone - the one
telling me that the last 2 frames out of 6 on my (4 frame) negative
strip is missing. So I'm happy already. 

As for performance/quality, difficult to tell yet

Mark





RE: filmscanners: URL: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update

2001-11-21 Thread James Grove

I can still see the web page?

http://www.nikon-euro.com/nikoneuro2/download/Download_107e.htm

NScan311wen.zip is still there

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony J.
Terlecki
Sent: 21 November 2001 01:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: URL: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update


On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:51:26AM +0100, Vladislav Jurco wrote:
> -
> Go to thr LS4000 scanner and next to Nikonscan 3.1.1
> Little bit faster, better memory handling. etc
> Mikael Risedal
> -
> 
> Mikael, I have downloaded it twice, both versions were corrupted and 
> could not be installed (PC). Because both were identical (compared 
> byte by byte) I assume that something is wrong with the file on the 
> web not with the transfer. How did you go through the installation, no

> problem?

It looks like they have pulled the English zip file NScan311wen.zip
which that link is going to. A manual ftp to that diretory shows it
isn't there.

The non-English versions are still present so it looks like just a
problem with 
that one file.

Tony

-- 
Tony Terlecki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




filmscanners: NikonScan V3.1.1 English Version

2001-11-21 Thread James Grove


I have d/l the V3.1.1 file from the Euro site and it runs fine for me
under Windows XP. If you want the file and have trouble accessing the
Nikon Sites, then please feel free to d/l from my FTP server.

62.31.210.174 Port 21
Username nikon
Password nikon

Use ONLY a FTP Client like Cute FTP, You must not use Passive Mode!
Set Cute FTP to FireWall Access in the settings box, of Cute FTP. If you
still have trouble then please alter these till you can connect. Sorry
about this but it's the only way to get round the firewall!


-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573




RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS40ED - first impressions

2001-11-16 Thread James Grove

Hi Mark

The URL he gave doesn`t exist. Nikon Scan V3.1 does work with XP
I use it all the time. Nikon Scan V3.1.1 is due soon, that supposedly
fixes various bugs. But Nikon offical line will allows be that it
doesn`t support XP, because if they said it did they would have to
provide techincal assitance to those that use that product.


-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Otway
Sent: 16 November 2001 08:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS40ED - first impressions


>>   well first of all if you want they have a bug fix version
>> of Nikon Scan Version 3.1 on their website.. I think the 
>> address is www.nikon-imaging.com

Thanks. I couldn't access that URL for some reason, but found 3.1 at
http://www.nikontechusa.com.

I also notice that on that site it mentions that Nikon Scan 3.1 does not
support Windows XP. However, they also claim that an XP-compatible
version of Nikon Scan is coming out before the end of Nobember (free
download).





RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images

2001-11-11 Thread James Grove

I have just ordered a 60 Gig Maxtor ATA 100 drive (ATA 133 is also
available) I have done this because it is far cheaper than buying
another 36 gig drive to go on my U160 SCSI channel. I can get the Maxtor
drives for around 60 UK pounds, which means I could buy 4 of these IDE
drives for the same price as a Quantum U160 36gig drive!

One thing to remember about Ide if you decide to give the drive a
beasting is to cool it with a slim cooler.

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ezio c/o TIN
Sent: 10 November 2001 21:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images


I would recommend to buy a U-160 SCSI ... from e-bay ... I have just
done this to integrate the other 3 U-160 I have and I have bought for
102US $ a 18GB IBM 1 rpm brand new under warranty. A 36GB 1rpm
also IBM U-160 is rated for 170 US $ ...

Sincerely.

Ezio

www.lucenti.com  e-photography site


- Original Message -
From: "Andrea de Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 4:53 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images


> Hello,
>
> I have a CreoScitex scanner with attached a, Apple G4 Silver 733 with 
> OS
9.2.1 and 1GB of ram; I noticed that the internal HD is a slow 5400rpm
UltraAta HD; question: since I work only with Photoshop and my images
are about 60mb in size and I just have to open and save them during the
day (we process about 200 images/day), I was wondering what is the best
and effective way to speed up my work: buy a scsi external HD 10.000rpm
(total cost about 650 UK pounds), OR buy an internal UltraAta 7200 rpm
(total cost about 250 UK pounds) ???
>
> Again, we just have to open, retouch and than save our 40mb images, 
> but
currently I am noticing that is taking a bit to access the HD.
>
> Thanks to give me your best solution for time/money issue. Andrea
> --
> 
> Fratelli Alinari Photo Archives and Museum
> http://www.alinari.com
> The world's oldest picture library
> tel: +39-055-2395201
> gsm: +39-347-4883223
> fax: +39-055-2382857
> 
>






RE: filmscanners: Buying a scanner - from the US

2001-10-05 Thread James Grove


I have been following this thread and would like to add that you
WILL be charged Duty and VAT on these items, Approx 3.2 Percent in Duty
and then 17.5 Percent in VAT. The only way to avoid this is to have the
item sent my normal US AirMail, all other carriers UPS,FedEx etc will
charge you, especially at the moment where ALL goods are being X-Rayed
to and from the US.

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Otway
Sent: 05 October 2001 10:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Buying a scanner - from the US



Hi all,

I've had a fair bit of feedback from various people about the negative
scanner to buy, and it seems that the Nikon CoolScan IV LS-40 might be a
good one to go for, since I've been warned off most machines cheaper
than that. I've a feeling it might be a bit of overkill, but

Anyway, US$800 or so seems to be quite a good price when I consider the
US/GBP exchange rate at the moment - it works out to about 575GBP, which
is slightly more than I intended to spend but would get me a scanner I'd
probably be able to live with for a long time.

So, a couple of questions:

1. What are the batch scanning features like on the Nikon?
2. Can anyone recommend an online store from which I could buy the
scanner in the US? 3. Any other ideas for scanners which might be
slightly cheaper, before I commit myself?

Thanks

Mark





RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0

2001-09-24 Thread James Grove

Same access just don't use IE or Passive mode for transfers

-- 
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pete Cutter
Sent: 24 September 2001 20:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0


James,

is this still on your ftp site?

I have two goes at downloading 3.1 from the Nikon site but it keeps
bombing out. i would be *very* grateful if you could give me temp access
to download it from your site instead?

best regards
Pete Cutter


- Original Message -
From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Claudiu Falub'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0


> You can grab it from me by ftp at
>
> 62.31.210.174 username nikon password nikon
>
>
> James Grove
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
> http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
> ICQ 99737573
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Claudiu Falub
> Sent: 06 July 2001 09:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I've recently purchased a Nikon LS IV scanner. It was delivered with 
> Nikonscan 3.0. While the scanner is ok, I don't like the software, 
> since it crashes all the time and I have to restart my computer and I 
> hate that. I heard the new version 3.1 is better. How can I get it? 
> The salesman told me that new version could be downloaded from 
> internet, but he couldn't give more details. If so, where and how 
> could I get this program? My system is a Pentium III, 1 GHz, 512 Mb 
> SDRAM, Matrox G450 32 Mb.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> Claudiu
>
>





RE: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!

2001-09-02 Thread James Grove

Nope, not as yet, but I wouldn`t hold your breath!

James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jawed Ashraf
Sent: 02 September 2001 15:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!


Wow, nice.  Pity that you've been through so much grief with replacement
and sending the blighter off to get looked at.

Fingers crossed for NS 3.2... Anyone heard anything about it?

Maybe you should post a sample so that we can nit-pick it for you - just
in case there's still some banding in there...

Jawed

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lawrence Smith
> Sent: 02 September 2001 14:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!
>
>
> All,
>
> For those of you who have been following my ongoing saga with banding 
> issues with my Coolscan 8000 here is an interesting update.  I have 
> tried the latest version of vuescan and guess what?  It appears after 
> doing a few test
> that the banding does not occur when using that software.  This is
great
> news as it gives me hope that nikon will be able to address this issue
in
> NikonScan and silverfast will most likely be a viable option (if they
ever
> get the current situation under control over there).  Thanks Ed
> for getting
> vuescan up and humming for us 8000 users :-)  Although i prefer Nikon
Scan
> for slides, it still proves that the hardware most likely is not the
> problem
>
> Lawrence Smith
>
> *
> * visit my site and participate *
> * in this weeks image critique  *
> * http://www.lwsphoto.com   *
> *
>
>
>
>




RE: filmscanners: Nikon CoolscanIV ED - auto slide feeder?

2001-08-18 Thread James Grove

No it wont, a great shame, as Nikon would have sold this unit well with
the CoolScan IV.

James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Freymann
Sent: 18 August 2001 19:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon CoolscanIV ED - auto slide feeder?


I have the new Nikon CoolscanIV ED which I like.  I have a boatload of
slides I want to scan.  I know the more expensive LS4000 has an auto
slide feeder optional but it is unclear whether my scanner works with
it.  Does anyone know, and if so - does it work well?  Thanks! -John
Freymann [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: filmscanners: SilverFast Upgrade Disaster

2001-08-13 Thread James Grove

Easy SICSI wont work with W2k. Also note that if you use one of the
latest Adaptec Ultra 160 cards you wont be able to intsall the ASPI
layer, These cards are 29160, 39160.


James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Greenbank
Sent: 13 August 2001 09:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SilverFast Upgrade Disaster


Lloyd

That sounds a bit like dodgy ASPI drivers. Have you tried any other SCSI
scanning software.

You could try ASPICHK from :

http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/support/suppdetail.html?prodkey=EZ-SCSI
_5.0

I notice that EZ-SCSI is having problems with 2000 so I don't know if
this will work. It does rather suggest there can be problems with 2000
if Adaptec can't get it working - they are usually considered the SCSI
experts.

Steve

- Original Message -
From: "Lloyd O'Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SilverFast Upgrade Disaster


Roger,

Let us know how the TWAIN version works. I'm having a similar problem
with v5.5 and my SS4000. At least, after reading your posts, I'm
thinking it might be Silverfast. I've also built a new computer and
switched scanning OS's back to Win2000. The SS4000 locks up Photoshop
upon selecting Scan in SF. In Insight, I get an unknown ASPI error
suggesting that I check termination. I've done that. Also, my Epson
1200S on the same chain (behind the SS) works fine using their TWAIN
driver.

I haven't contacted Lasersoft on this latest headache yet.

Lloyd
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:23 PM
  Subject: Re: filmscanners: SilverFast Upgrade Disaster


  In a message dated 8/12/2001 4:56:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Not wishing to sound to gloomy, but the advice sounds like a "we
have no
idea - but it might work if we re-install everything". The good news
is that
it often does - the bad news is IME it more often doesn't. When I
had a
problem they gave me all sorts of advice and blamed other software
suppliers
when I knew it was their problem from the tests I had done. I had
also found
a way round the problem which was an inconvenience rather than a
showstopper. 3-6 months later an update fixed the problem but they
didn't
e-mail me to tell me. If I had paid the normal asking price (it was
bundled)
and my livlihood depended on it I would have been bloody livid.

Depressingly Lasersoft support is actually better than many others.

Steve


  Your comment about workarounds gave me an idea.  After the reinstall
of
  Photoshop, if SilverFast causes Photoshop to freeze again with a 500
MB file
  from my SS120, I'll try to install SilverFast as TWAIN rather than a
  Photoshop plug-in.  I remember having a similar problem where my
Microtek
  ScanMaker 5 flatbed scanner with ScanWizard software would cause
Photoshop to
  freeze about every third scan.  ScanWizard could be used either as a
  Photoshop plug-in or as a stand alone program, so I run it by itself
now.
  You're right, it's not convenient, but right now I need to get some
work done
  and the sooner the better, even if it's not convenient.





RE: filmscanners: Image management software

2001-08-13 Thread James Grove

I use FotoStation Pro from www.fotoware.com

James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karl
Schulmeisters
Sent: 13 August 2001 09:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Image management software


I'm looking for some recommendations on what image management software
folks are using.  The size of my image collection, both scanned and
unscanned is growing past my normal haphazard filing systems
capabilities.  Given the amount of images being scanned, anyone have any
recommendations?




filmscanners: SilverFast vs Others

2001-08-04 Thread James Grove


I have read a great deal about SilverFast, can someone tell me the
advantages of SilverFast over say Nikon Scan 3.1 and VueScan?


James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 




RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE

2001-07-09 Thread James Grove


I havent (yet) notved any differnece between scans with ICE and
without. Maybe I am not doing something right?!


James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jawed Ashraf
Sent: 09 July 2001 20:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE


Does anyone understand the difference between Normal and Fine mode?  Is
it a resolution thing?  Or a time-to-compute thing?

I'm using an LS40.  Is fine a waste of time, because my scanner isn't of
a high-enough resolution?

Jawed




RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0

2001-07-06 Thread James Grove

You can grab it from me by ftp at

62.31.210.174 username nikon password nikon


James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Claudiu Falub
Sent: 06 July 2001 09:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0


Hi!

I've recently purchased a Nikon LS IV scanner. It was delivered with
Nikonscan 3.0. While the scanner is ok, I don't like the software, since
it crashes all the time and I have to restart my computer and I hate
that. I heard the new version 3.1 is better. How can I get it? The
salesman told me that new version could be downloaded from internet, but
he couldn't give more details. If so, where and how could I get this
program? My system is a Pentium III, 1 GHz, 512 Mb SDRAM, Matrox G450 32
Mb.

Thanks a lot in advance,
Claudiu





RE: filmscanners: Frustrating NikonScan 3.1 Problem

2001-06-15 Thread James Grove

I had exactly the same problem, the only way to fix it was to re-format
and re-install, not to much tourble for me thank goodness! I didn`t
think it had happened to any one else. I put it down to a program I
installed after Nikon Scan V3.1 that messed the TWAIN up?

Please let me know how you get on.


James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Enoch's Vision,
Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
Sent: 15 June 2001 14:03
To: Filmscanners
Subject: filmscanners: Frustrating NikonScan 3.1 Problem


Has anyone had any problems with NikonScan 3.1 in Windows 2000?

NikonScan 3.1 only worked correctly for me for the first two days. After

that it always displayed the message "No active devices found." I looked
in 
TWAIN.LOG to see if there were any debug messages (you can usually find 
this file in your TEMP folder) and read:

TWAIN_32.DLL - MESSAGE - CTwunk  ::AppInitialize - Reset Log
TWAIN_32.DLL - MESSAGE - CTwunk  ::OpenServer - Starting Thunker
TWAIN_32.DLL - MESSAGE - CTwunk  ::CloseServer - Why Can't We Find The 
Thunker Window?

Despite NikonScan's inability to find the "thunker" the scanner was
listed 
in Device Manager as working properly and Vuescan operated it perfectly.

Specifically this occurred with my Nikon LS-4000 in Windows 2000/SP1.

I've temporarily solved the problem--though I don't know why this 
worked--by uninstalling NikonScan 3.1 and reinstalling version 3.0. So
now 
all the instability and memory bugs are back but NikonScan recognizes
the 
scanner again.

Does anyone have any idea why this is happening? I wrote with specifics
to 
Nikon technical support but if my past experience is any guide they
won't 
respond and if they do their answer will be vague if not outright 
irrelevant. I used Sysinternal's Regmon and Filemon in addition to a 
Registry before and after tool to try and troubleshoot the problem but 
found nothing.


Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
http://www.enochsvision.com/ http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- "Behind all 
these manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through all
things. 
The function of art is to reveal this radiance through the created
object." 
~Joseph Campbell




RE: filmscanners: New Nikon and ICE feature

2001-06-09 Thread James Grove

Er it shouldn`t at least it doesn't on mine (V3.1) 

James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of AR Studio
Sent: 09 June 2001 15:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: New Nikon and ICE feature


Just discovered with Nikon IV that ICE (normal setting, at least) will
act as ROC (color restoration) if you have an image that has a
dominating color, let's say a green forest or a field of yellow flowers.
It will try to equalize the image so there's more than just than green,
but also magentas etc. Otherwise, on multi-color images, ICE works as
it's supposed to. Andrew + Helen




RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-07 Thread James Grove

Thanks to all that replied.

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: 07 June 2001 00:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


James wrote:
>Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than
>my Minolta was! You can here the motors whirring (is that a word?) when
>you put the film adaptors in.
> I just want to know whether they are supposed to whirr?!

Yes.  The scanner is readjusting the mechanism for the new adaptor.
My LS30 does the same thing.

Rob


Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com







RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-07 Thread James Grove

2 weeks. (Ish) See www.nikon-image.com (Use a web translator)

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
Sr.
Sent: 06 June 2001 22:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


Define "soon" :-)

Maris

- Original Message -----
From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


| Nikon Scan V3.1 is out soon, dont worry the bugs are fixed, well most
of
| them anyway!
|
| --
| James Grove
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
| http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
| ICQ 99737573
|
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Copier
| Sent: 06 June 2001 19:18
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4
|
|
| James,
|
| I don't know how a minolta sounds, but my first filmscanner was an
LS-20
| and
| that machine moves the complete filmstripholder in en out during the
| scan
| stage and was very noisy especially the focus machanism, the LS-40
| doesn't
| make so much noise as far as I can hear.
| I'm only complaining about the scansoftware (Nikonscan 3), it seems
| rather
| buggy
|
|
| ----- Original Message -
| From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:44 AM
| Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4
|
|
| > Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader
than
| > my Minolta was! You can here the motors whirring (is that a word?)
| when
| > you put the film adaptors in.
| >
| > I just want to know whether they are supposed to whirr?!
| >
| > --
| > James Grove
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
| > http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
| > ICQ 99737573
| >
| > -Original Message-
| > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Copier
| > Sent: 05 June 2001 18:18
| > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4
| >
| >
| > Hi James
| >
| > mine  is'nt noisy, maybe you can be more specific.
| >
| > Jan
| >
| >
| > - Original Message -
| > From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:23 PM
| > Subject: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4
| >
| >
| > >
| > > Anyone else find there Coolscan IV noisey?
| > >
| > > --
| > > James Grove
| > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > > http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
| > > http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
| > > ICQ 99737573
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
|
|
|
|





RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread James Grove

Nikon Scan V3.1 is out soon, dont worry the bugs are fixed, well most of
them anyway!

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Copier
Sent: 06 June 2001 19:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


James,

I don't know how a minolta sounds, but my first filmscanner was an LS-20
and
that machine moves the complete filmstripholder in en out during the
scan
stage and was very noisy especially the focus machanism, the LS-40
doesn't
make so much noise as far as I can hear.
I'm only complaining about the scansoftware (Nikonscan 3), it seems
rather
buggy


- Original Message -----
From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


> Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than
> my Minolta was! You can here the motors whirring (is that a word?)
when
> you put the film adaptors in.
>
> I just want to know whether they are supposed to whirr?!
>
> --
> James Grove
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
> http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
> ICQ 99737573
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Copier
> Sent: 05 June 2001 18:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4
>
>
> Hi James
>
> mine  is'nt noisy, maybe you can be more specific.
>
> Jan
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:23 PM
> Subject: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4
>
>
> >
> > Anyone else find there Coolscan IV noisey?
> >
> > --
> > James Grove
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
> > http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
> > ICQ 99737573
> >
> >
>
>





RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread James Grove

Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than
my Minolta was! You can here the motors whirring (is that a word?) when
you put the film adaptors in.

I just want to know whether they are supposed to whirr?!

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Copier
Sent: 05 June 2001 18:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


Hi James

mine  is'nt noisy, maybe you can be more specific.

Jan


- Original Message -
From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4


>
> Anyone else find there Coolscan IV noisey?
>
> --
> James Grove
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
> http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
> ICQ 99737573
>
>





RE: filmscanners: CoolScan IV

2001-06-04 Thread James Grove


Any find there CoolScan IV a bit noisey?

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573






filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-04 Thread James Grove


Anyone else find there Coolscan IV noisey?

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573





RE: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ? ( SCSI vs USB )

2001-06-04 Thread James Grove

I dont think that will work, as many SCSI devices have to be seen by the
SCSI BIOS on boot up.

--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ron Carlson
Sent: 04 June 2001 06:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ? ( SCSI vs USB )


If you want to turn on your SCSI device after your computer is already
booted, No problem. Just right click on  MY
COMPUTER, left click on properties,select DEVICE Manager tab and left
click
on REFRESH and then OK. This is for a windows machine. I don't know what
you
need to do for an Apple machine.
Regards, Ron

- Original Message -
From: "Steve Greenbank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ?


> > 3. Minolta may be USB, but USB devices has the advantage of being
> > hot-swappable which means they can be turned on after the computer
has
> been
> > booted, and it will be detected.  If I remember correctly, SCSI
devices
> need
> > to be turned on before you boot the system, in order for the SCSI
> controller
> > to detect it.
>
> Generally in Win 9x/ME you can turn any device on and go to "device
manager"
> of "system properties" and click on "refresh" and the device will
work.
>
> Remember with USB you can take your scanner anywhere and plug it into
any
> modern machine - you'll probably need to install some drivers as well.
The
> downside is speed and some USB devices don't like some USB
controllers. My
> USB controller on a Via KT133 motherboard is a complete PITA.
>
> Steve
>





filmscanners: LS-1000 or Dimage Scan Dual

2001-05-04 Thread James Grove


Can anyone help me here I currently use a Minolta Dimage Scan
Dual, I have been offered a Nikon LS-1000 at a good price, woulr I
benefit from the upgrade or is it not an upgrade?


James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573