Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2

2001-06-13 Thread Marvin Demuth

At 03:18 PM 6/7/01, Mikael Risedal wrote:

I heard  from collegues at a Swedish newspaper that the new Polaroid 120 
scanner in many respects is better than a tested Imacon scanner.
I will test the polaroid scanner this sunday and see if this true.

Mikael, did you have the opportunity to make the test?

Marvin Demuth





Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2

2001-06-13 Thread Mikael Risedal

No. My mother died so I was away.
I hope to do a test next week if I have the time.
Sweden's biggest newspaper and their photo department did a speed test on 
the scanner with   Silverfast software.

Time including auto focus + calibrating  6x7cm original
20MB, 1min 20 sec
82MB, 1min 25 sec (!)
260MB, 3 min 15 sec (full optical resolution  6 x 7 cm  original)
Impressive if you compare to Imacon or all other scanners.
Mikael Risedal
Photographer
Lund Sweden
--





From: Marvin Demuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:31:36 -0500

At 03:18 PM 6/7/01, Mikael Risedal wrote:

I heard  from collegues at a Swedish newspaper that the new Polaroid 120
scanner in many respects is better than a tested Imacon scanner.
I will test the polaroid scanner this sunday and see if this true.

Mikael, did you have the opportunity to make the test?

Marvin Demuth



_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2

2001-06-08 Thread Mikael Risedal

Write to Silverfast or read at http://lasersoft-imaging.com/english/
Mikael Risedal
Photographer
Lund Sweden


From: Robert Kehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:53:01 -0500

Mikael,

Do you know if Silverfast 5.2 supports batch scanning of full rolls of 35mm
film with the Nikon LS-4000 using the SA-30 roll film adapter?

Bob Kehl

- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:18 PM
Subject: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2


  Took a quick look at the new NikonScan 3.1 version nr 3.1.0  3004
  plugin LS 4000 relesed today.
  Same as before. Crasch boom bang with photoshop, slow scanning speed
  comparing to Silverfast. Silverfast are at least 5 times faster to scan 
a
  full resolution picture and no bugs.
  I heard  from collegues at a Swedish newspaper that the new Polaroid 120
  scanner in many respects is better than a tested Imacon scanner.
  I will test the polaroid scanner this sunday and see if this true.
  If it is: congratulation Polaroid.
  The software they used together with the scanner was Silverfast.
  Mikael Risedal
  Photographer
  Lund Sweden
 
 
 
 
 
  
_
  Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at 
http://www.hotmail.com.
 


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan

2001-06-08 Thread Mikael Risedal

I have not tried Vuescan on LS4000 but its a good basic software on
LS2000. If you want a pro software and know what you are doing or will learn 
to scan
pictures Silverfast is the best software to have IMO. And its very fast 
scanning software even with different filters on. In Europe we get 
Silverfast bundle together with Nikon LS2000 and Polaroid scanners.
Mikael Risedal
Photographer
Lund Sweden

--


From: Ray Amos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 23:54:13 -0400

Friends,

I have and love the new Nikon LS4000 scanner.  According to some on this
usergroup and others I know, the software that comes with the scanner is
inferior.  Some say Silverfast, some say Vuscan.  Where do you get these
software packages and how much do they cost?  Which is better?  What
will they do that NikonScan 3.1 won't do?  Thanks.

Ray Amos



_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




RE: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan

2001-06-08 Thread Paul Chefurka

Silverfast is at http://www.silverfast.com - the price is $307 USD
Vuscan is a http://www.hamrick.com - the price is $40 which includes Vueprint as well.

I've been using Vuescan for a over a year now.  I bought Silverfast 5 for my Polaroid 
SS4000 (before it was bundled) and consider it to be the biggest waste of money in my 
digital darkroom experience.  Not kidding.  High bit scans in Vuescan and final 
corrections in PS6 for me are faster and better than anything Silverfast can offer.

I've downloaded and tried NikonScan 3.1 and it doesn't produce any better images than 
3.0, and IMO the interface still sucks.   Vuescan is still faster and better, amd I 
even prefer the interface.

Paul Chefurka

-Original Message-
From: Ray Amos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan


Friends,

I have and love the new Nikon LS4000 scanner.  According to some on this
usergroup and others I know, the software that comes with the scanner is
inferior.  Some say Silverfast, some say Vuscan.  Where do you get these
software packages and how much do they cost?  Which is better?  What
will they do that NikonScan 3.1 won't do?  Thanks.

Ray Amos




RE: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan

2001-06-08 Thread Mikael Risedal

Paul
If you  know what you are doing when you are scanning a negative or positive 
film  Silverfast is IMO superior  to all other scanner software on the 
market today..No other software  have all the
features and parameters as Silverfast have   (general color handling, 
specific color handling, white, gray ,and black point. curves , histogram 
and much much more. I can  measure  up the   film in Silverfast and get  
scanning results who are much better in all aspects than a calculating 
software.  It all depends on your own skills  when you are working with 
Silverfast. VueScan is a excellent software but Silverfast is a scanning 
tool.
If someone really will learn how to scan a  film my suggestion is use 
Silverfast and VueScan
For easy scan-VueScan. For complex scan-Silverfast.
Its takes many many hours of training to be a good scanner operator but it 
worth it. Its like in the darkroom- the pleasure of knowing what Im doing.
Mikael Risedal
Photoghrapher
Lund Sweden

From: Paul Chefurka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:56:38 -0700

Silverfast is at http://www.silverfast.com - the price is $307 USD
Vuscan is a http://www.hamrick.com - the price is $40 which includes 
Vueprint as well.

I've been using Vuescan for a over a year now.  I bought Silverfast 5 for 
my Polaroid SS4000 (before it was bundled) and consider it to be the 
biggest waste of money in my digital darkroom experience.  Not kidding.  
High bit scans in Vuescan and final corrections in PS6 for me are faster 
and better than anything Silverfast can offer.

I've downloaded and tried NikonScan 3.1 and it doesn't produce any better 
images than 3.0, and IMO the interface still sucks.   Vuescan is still 
faster and better, amd I even prefer the interface.

Paul Chefurka

-Original Message-
From: Ray Amos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan


Friends,

I have and love the new Nikon LS4000 scanner.  According to some on this
usergroup and others I know, the software that comes with the scanner is
inferior.  Some say Silverfast, some say Vuscan.  Where do you get these
software packages and how much do they cost?  Which is better?  What
will they do that NikonScan 3.1 won't do?  Thanks.

Ray Amos


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan

2001-06-08 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.

Counterpoint - everything you are doing in Silverfast I can do much better
in PhotoShop or PhotoPaint.  All I want from the scan is to capture all the
details in it - Vuescan will do this for me very nicely and very easily.

If I need to further adjust white and black points, detail in highlights
and/or shadows, or colors, I have more tools available in PhotoShop/Paint
and all of the pixels I need are there from the initial scan.

Its like in the darkroom - the pleasure of knowing what I'm doing.  I do the
same in PhotoPaint as you do in Silverfast but I can see what I am doing
better.

Maris

- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:38 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan


| Paul
| If you  know what you are doing when you are scanning a negative or
positive
| film  Silverfast is IMO superior  to all other scanner software on the
| market today..No other software  have all the
| features and parameters as Silverfast have   (general color handling,
| specific color handling, white, gray ,and black point. curves , histogram
| and much much more. I can  measure  up the   film in Silverfast and get
| scanning results who are much better in all aspects than a calculating
| software.  It all depends on your own skills  when you are working with
| Silverfast. VueScan is a excellent software but Silverfast is a scanning
| tool.
| If someone really will learn how to scan a  film my suggestion is use
| Silverfast and VueScan
| For easy scan-VueScan. For complex scan-Silverfast.
| Its takes many many hours of training to be a good scanner operator but it
| worth it. Its like in the darkroom- the pleasure of knowing what Im doing.
| Mikael Risedal
| Photoghrapher
| Lund Sweden
|
| From: Paul Chefurka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan
| Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:56:38 -0700
| 
| Silverfast is at http://www.silverfast.com - the price is $307 USD
| Vuscan is a http://www.hamrick.com - the price is $40 which includes
| Vueprint as well.
| 
| I've been using Vuescan for a over a year now.  I bought Silverfast 5 for
| my Polaroid SS4000 (before it was bundled) and consider it to be the
| biggest waste of money in my digital darkroom experience.  Not kidding.
| High bit scans in Vuescan and final corrections in PS6 for me are faster
| and better than anything Silverfast can offer.
| 
| I've downloaded and tried NikonScan 3.1 and it doesn't produce any better
| images than 3.0, and IMO the interface still sucks.   Vuescan is still
| faster and better, amd I even prefer the interface.
| 
| Paul Chefurka
| 
| -Original Message-
| From: Ray Amos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:54 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan
| 
| 
| Friends,
| 
| I have and love the new Nikon LS4000 scanner.  According to some on this
| usergroup and others I know, the software that comes with the scanner is
| inferior.  Some say Silverfast, some say Vuscan.  Where do you get these
| software packages and how much do they cost?  Which is better?  What
| will they do that NikonScan 3.1 won't do?  Thanks.
| 
| Ray Amos
| 
|
| _
| Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|




Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2

2001-06-07 Thread Robert Kehl

Mikael,

Do you know if Silverfast 5.2 supports batch scanning of full rolls of 35mm
film with the Nikon LS-4000 using the SA-30 roll film adapter?

Bob Kehl

- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:18 PM
Subject: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2


 Took a quick look at the new NikonScan 3.1 version nr 3.1.0  3004
 plugin LS 4000 relesed today.
 Same as before. Crasch boom bang with photoshop, slow scanning speed
 comparing to Silverfast. Silverfast are at least 5 times faster to scan a
 full resolution picture and no bugs.
 I heard  from collegues at a Swedish newspaper that the new Polaroid 120
 scanner in many respects is better than a tested Imacon scanner.
 I will test the polaroid scanner this sunday and see if this true.
 If it is: congratulation Polaroid.
 The software they used together with the scanner was Silverfast.
 Mikael Risedal
 Photographer
 Lund Sweden





 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.





Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2 - Vuescan

2001-06-07 Thread Ray Amos

Friends,

I have and love the new Nikon LS4000 scanner.  According to some on this
usergroup and others I know, the software that comes with the scanner is
inferior.  Some say Silverfast, some say Vuscan.  Where do you get these
software packages and how much do they cost?  Which is better?  What
will they do that NikonScan 3.1 won't do?  Thanks.

Ray Amos