Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
"Bill Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this regard, but the comments were mild. Other than that I don't > remember anyone anywhere mentioning FOCUS as a problem with the > Polaroid. Strictly speaking, the problem with the Nikon is depth of field, not focus. :) [question to all] Has anyone with a SS4000 found a curved slide that causes a problem? My impression is that the Polaroid's light source is bright enough to avoid DOF problems. Rob
filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
Bill wrote: >o I have thousands of Kodachrome slides dating back twenty years in >both plastic and cardboard mounts with what I consider "normal" >degrees of curvature for slides. Hi Bill, I was wondering whether you've tried scanning any of these slides on a Polaroid SS4000 and compared the results? Has anyone done any testing on the depth of field on the SS4000? I've heard a lot about the Nikons, but not much about the Polaroid. I'm not disputing there's a problem - I'm just wondering whether the problem persists with other 4000dpi scanners and the same slides? Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com