Re: [Fink-devel] bug : /sw/bin/cons has #!/usr/bin/python instead of /sw/bin/python

2006-10-04 Thread alexkhansen

 -- Original message --
From: Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 or !/usr/bin/env python


Care to remind us what package this is from?  

If the package just needs a python interpreter to run a script, I think we 
don't necessarily mandate using a fink-installed python.

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink Documenter

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] bug : /sw/bin/cons has #!/usr/bin/python instead of /sw/bin/python

2006-10-04 Thread alexkhansen


 -- Original message --
From: Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 dmacks fixed it.
 
 the package is scons
 
 a python program typically also requires other libraries to run. And if one
 has installed those libraries under fink python, then it won't run
 elsewhere.

I agree in the case of a python program.  

However, if the package just processses a bunch of scripts that don't care 
about what python you use then it seems a bit harsh to make people build a full 
python distro when the system-installed one will be fine.

There are no binary files that link to libraries in this package--just shell 
scripts, python scripts, and text files.

The last note on this package in the commits from the maintainer says use 
system python and the CompileScript explictly calls /usr/bin/python, so it 
clearly was a choice, and will build the same way on any Mac of the same OS 
version (if they change their python that's another matter, of course).  If it 
was just built with python, then there would be a problem.

 
 Not only that but it may need to load extra config files or settings that
 will work best from the fink version over a vanilla person.
 

Possible, but I'm pretty sure the maintainer checked that out in this case, and 
he'll let you know in a couple of weeks.
(cced)

 On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  -- Original message --
  From: Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   or !/usr/bin/env python
 
 
  Care to remind us what package this is from?
 
  If the package just needs a python interpreter to run a script, I think we
  don't necessarily mandate using a fink-installed python.
 
  --
  Alexander K. Hansen
  Fink Documenter
 



--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink Documenter

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel