Re: [flexcoders] Flex's Layout manager for Flash?
Hello Aldo, Aldo Bucchi wrote: >I was revisiting those classes yesterday when I decided to look for >other Layout Managers. >I haven't found any.. > >Mmmh I believe I'll move this post to flashcoders, see if it digs any thoughts > yeah, I've seen your post on flashcoders, You can take a look at Joey Lott's ascb library which comes with kind of layout managers, (look at ascb.containers.* package), http://www.person13.com/ascblibrary/ for example: [quote] /** The Box container can arrange elements either in a single row or in a single column. You can also nest a Box as an element of a Box to create a grid. */ [/quote] ascb library is written for Flash, quite simple but was more than enough for me for one project I made for Flash, I hope that some things from Flex will be available for Flash IDE too someday, :) hth, regards, Peter Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] Flex SWF in Zinc
Hi Jessie, I wondered about the same licensing question when I've been testing Flex inside ZINC, I've simply use .exe as shell container for .swf served from Flex just like in browser , thanx for asking that, regards Peter, MDM Support Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] JesterXL wrote: Is wrapping a Flex SWF using Zinc, and distributing the EXE ok via the EULA? Aral Balkan brought this up to me after I told him my progress on a project, and thought I'd ask. I wrote a small GUI for NaturalDocs (naturaldocs.org) since it's only command line. I used Zinc as the wrapper since Central cannot get folder paths. Thanks in advance if you can help! --JesterXL
Re: [flexcoders] Using Zinc with Flex
Hi Scott, it sounds similar to Flex/Central integration: Flex application is hosted within Central shell and as source file during installation: [quote] Ok, Say you build a SWF thats got a few API classes in there that >interface to ZInc's FSCOMMAND level ones. > >Then using a loadMovie() approach you bring in an external swf - that >being your flex server...aka myurl.com/app/blah.mxml.swf > >Inside that swf, it can excute commands within its parent container >(ie swf inside the zinc luv). > >To me that should be fine as thats like saying you can't use a browser >to run your flex apps. Furthermore it would then mean MM have to >release an "approved" browser list as what classifies as an agent for >FLEX based mxml/swf files? > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] SharedObject across Applications
Hello everyone, I'm not sure if that will work with Flex application but to avoid such collision names in standalone desktop application I've used names following package pattern: eg: var soName:String = "com.company.cookieName"; var so:SharedObject = SharedObject.getLocal(soName, "/"); there is a subset of characters which are not allowed in SO name but dots are allowed :) hth, regards, Peter Peter Blazejewicz JesterXL wrote: As long as your apps are both deployed on "cow.com", then just add a "/" to the 2nd parameter of your get, and it'll put the .sol at the top level of the domain. Currently, it's scoped to a folder name same as your app path. The 2nd parameter creates it's own folderpath/namespace. Maknig a "/" puts it at the top. however, watch for out collisions of data since your both sharing. You don't have to worry about file handles or anything, but you know why checkin/checkout systems were invented in the first place... Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
