RE: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images

2006-06-02 Thread Rick Roen
Thanks Jeremias and Joerg,

I downloaded the latest (you're right, it's not all that hard) and the
resulting pdf is now 27K, not 225K!)

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 12:27 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images

Joerg is right. It's the color profile bug. I don't even have to look at
the barcode image because it doesn't matter if there's a color profile
attached. FOP 0.92beta will add one anyway due to the bug.

Compiling FOP Trunk is very simple:
- Install a Subversion client
- Install Apache Ant
- Check out FOP
- Run "ant" from the FOP's home directory

All neatly described on the website:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/compiling.html
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/repo.html




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images

2006-06-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Joerg is right. It's the color profile bug. I don't even have to look at
the barcode image because it doesn't matter if there's a color profile
attached. FOP 0.92beta will add one anyway due to the bug.

Compiling FOP Trunk is very simple:
- Install a Subversion client
- Install Apache Ant
- Check out FOP
- Run "ant" from the FOP's home directory

All neatly described on the website:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/compiling.html
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/repo.html

On 02.06.2006 00:39:15 Rick Roen wrote:
> I've attached a sample of a png file for the postnet barcode.
> 
> I'm a complete java novice and last time I tried to compile the latest
> version I spent hours and got nothing since I don't know the basics.
> 
> Can you check from the attachment to see if it has a color profile?
> 
> Rick
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:27 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images
> 
> Rick Roen wrote:
> > When I add two postnet bar codes, each of which are 1K png files, the pdf
> > goes to about 225K.
> > 
> > Why does it grow so large?
> 
> Wild guess: there was a problem with embedding large color profiles
> into the PDF if the original pictures didn't contain a color profile.
> The problem has been fixed in SVN. Could you grab a recent snapshot
> and check whether the problem persists?


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images

2006-06-01 Thread Rick Roen
I've attached a sample of a png file for the postnet barcode.

I'm a complete java novice and last time I tried to compile the latest
version I spent hours and got nothing since I don't know the basics.

Can you check from the attachment to see if it has a color profile?

Rick

-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:27 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images

Rick Roen wrote:
> When I add two postnet bar codes, each of which are 1K png files, the pdf
> goes to about 225K.
> 
> Why does it grow so large?

Wild guess: there was a problem with embedding large color profiles
into the PDF if the original pictures didn't contain a color profile.
The problem has been fixed in SVN. Could you grab a recent snapshot
and check whether the problem persists?

J.Pietschmann

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



postnet93907.png
Description: PNG image
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 200K increase for xml -> pdf when using images

2006-06-01 Thread J.Pietschmann

Rick Roen wrote:

When I add two postnet bar codes, each of which are 1K png files, the pdf
goes to about 225K.

Why does it grow so large?


Wild guess: there was a problem with embedding large color profiles
into the PDF if the original pictures didn't contain a color profile.
The problem has been fixed in SVN. Could you grab a recent snapshot
and check whether the problem persists?

J.Pietschmann

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]