Re: [fossil-users] Forget large set of changes
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said Paolo Bolzoni on Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:18:10 +0100: > What do you mean by, ``I got an update of these files?'' > > Does that mean that someone else committed some changes to your > repository and when you did ``fossil update'' you got all their changes? > And you want to change them? > > Or does that mean you made some changes to the working checkout, and > committed them? > > Or does it mean that you made some changes to your working checkout and > decided you don't like the changes? Now I see why it was confusing. Let me explain, the dir1 content comes from outside. It is basically a dump of the customer key store. The customer did an update and sent me the new version. This was unexpected, as I from the discussion we had I understood that I was pretty much the only one working on that. Fortunately, there were no conflicts; but once copied the new version the mess started as their dump changed the order of many files even if the content were semantically the same. On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Mark Janssen <mpc.jans...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fossil cannot remove existing history. So removing only one dir and > the associated history is not possible. > > Why don't you just update the files to be sorted and after that always > keep adding them sorted? > > The diffs up until now will still be noisy, but from now on they will > be more readable and you will keep the previous history. Yes, that's what I am doing. I had a couple of large commits, but at all things considered it is not a big deal. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Forget large set of changes
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-sendok-1514667978.gogchbpihoafjfdje...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said Paolo Bolzoni on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:40:17 +0100: > >> It worked fairly well until I received an unexpected update of the >> original files. I unpacked the new files in dir1 and fossil detected >> hundreds of changes; looking better however this changes are mostly >> just order changes. > > Can you give a more concrete example? I'm not sure what you mean by they > are ``mostly just order changes.'' What order changed? > >> So, my problem is... what is the best way to proceed? I can start a >> new fossil repository, but I would lose the history in dir2. I can >> delete dir1 and recommit the two versions sorted, but it would add >> lots of needless changes in the repo again. > > What exactly are you doing here? How can you lose history of dir2 if the > history is committed to Fossil? > > Again, I think additional details would be helpful. Some fossil and > shell commands that show how to reproduce your situation would be > useful. > > Thanks, > > Andy > -- > TAI64 timestamp: 40005a2072ee The dir1 files are key-value stores, a file contents look like this: keyn,this is;an array;of values, key1,value, key3,2.1, key2,another value, The order of the keys is not important. What happened is that I got an update of these files and the new version changed the order of most the keys, but it changed only few values. However, this changes in the order made the fossil diffs confusing and large. If I could go back, I would store all the files sorted, and here comes the question. Can I make fossil forget all the changes in dir1? so I put back them back properly sorted? The obvious solution would be to delete the fossil repository and do it again, but I would not like to do so as as I would lose my changes in the second dir. I am not sure what command lines would help, but I sorted the files with: $ find /directory -type f -exec lsort.sh ';' where lsort.sh contains: LC_ALL=C sort <"$1" >/tmp/"$$"_tmp mv /tmp/"$$"_tmp "$1" ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Forget large set of changes
Dear list, I have a fairly large set of files, (a bit fewer than 60,000) containing a simple key-value store in text format. Being it so huge, and since I need to do edit only few files (besides the customer needs only the changed ones) i organized my project in this way: dir1/ original files dir2/ the files I changed and kept it under fossil revision control. However, the original files are not sorted in any way; so I usually do the commits in two stages: (one) coping and sorting the original file from dir1 to dir2 and committing, (two) do my edits on the dir2 copy and commiting. Doing so, the diffs are very clear. It worked fairly well until I received an unexpected update of the original files. I unpacked the new files in dir1 and fossil detected hundreds of changes; looking better however this changes are mostly just order changes. I would like to see the changes better and avoid this problem in the future. So, my problem is... what is the best way to proceed? I can start a new fossil repository, but I would lose the history in dir2. I can delete dir1 and recommit the two versions sorted, but it would add lots of needless changes in the repo again. Ideally I would be able to shun the whole history of dir1, so I can add it sorted and update it. What can I do? Any suggestion? Cheers, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync
Dear list, I'd like to use fossil in a strangely configurated headless machine. In that machine to connected to the internet I need to use a socks proxy. I checked the fossil manual, but I could not find anything about it. It is possible to clone and sync via socks proxies? I'll be happy to read the fine manual if it is there, just point me :) Thanks. Yours faithfully, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync
I actually found that page, but it speaks only of http proxies. Not socks proxies. At the moment I solved using tsocks[1]. [1] http://tsocks.sourceforge.net On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 10/20/15, Paolo Bolzoni <paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I'd like to use fossil in a strangely configurated headless machine. >> In that machine to connected to the internet I need to use a socks >> proxy. >> >> I checked the fossil manual, but I could not find anything about it. >> It is possible to clone and sync via socks proxies? >> I'll be happy to read the fine manual if it is there, just point me :) > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/quickstart.wiki#proxy > > I found the above by entering "proxy" into the search bar at the top > of the page on > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/permutedindex.html > >> Thanks. >> >> Yours faithfully, >> Paolo >> ___ >> fossil-users mailing list >> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org >> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >> > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > ___ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] diff after update
Dear list, Is there a way to get a diff between what I had in the disk before executing "fossil update" and after? I'd be happy to read the (fine) manual, but I cannot find the place. Thanks! Yours faithfully, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fine(r) commit granularity
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Steve Stefanovich s...@stef.rs wrote: From: Paolo Bolzoni Sent: Wednesday, 29 July 2015 08:38 fossil commit filename might help you in your problem? It gets messy when there is a number of files, on Windows at least where using pipes and xargs is limited compared to Unix. Sorry, I have no experience with Windows. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fine(r) commit granularity
fossil commit filename might help you in your problem? On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Hello, recently I was submtting some package-build scripts to one Linux distro and had to use Git - from within Emacs along with Magit interface. Somehow, the nad had arisen to use Magit’t ability to split diff into smaller chunks and do commit with fine(r) granularity which reminded me of the feature which was available long ago in Darcs’ “record” command which has ’-i’ option to interactively record/commit changes. Now I wonder if there is some way to do the same with Fossil and/or what do you think about such feature, iow. split commit within one file in smaller chunks when one forgets to ’safe often, commit often’ or simply wants to divide single commit into several ones? Sincerely, Gour -- As the ignorant perform their duties with attachment to results, the learned may similarly act, but without attachment, for the sake of leading people on the right path. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Ignoring merge conflicts on a binary file
Dear list, I am writing a pdf document using LaTeX, since some of the readers have problems compiling I'd like to keep also the .pdf under revision control. The .pdf is actually a binary output of other files, so it should be ignored during merge conflicts. I know this violated the basics of a scm, but it is possible to tell the repository to treat some file differently and do not try to merge them, but simply replace? Your faithfully, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Jump between branches
Dear list, I have a project that contains a tex file about a paper and the relative C++ code. When I want to try some crazy idea I like to make a branch work in it and finally mergin in truck or closing depending how well it worked. But in this case I want also to continue to work on the paper that is always on trunk branch. I was working on another branch, lets say OTHER, when I committed using fossil commit --branch trunk and I think something went wrong. In the webui the last commit does appear as descendant of the last trunk commit, but as child of OTHER even if in the branch trunk. I am in autosync mode, it is too late to fix? And, in general how can I work with distinct branches without merging? I can say: fossil, leave this branch as it is but now I want to work in another one? Yours faithfully, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Jump between branches
Works great, thanks! On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 3/4/15, Paolo Bolzoni paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list, I have a project that contains a tex file about a paper and the relative C++ code. When I want to try some crazy idea I like to make a branch work in it and finally mergin in truck or closing depending how well it worked. But in this case I want also to continue to work on the paper that is always on trunk branch. I was working on another branch, lets say OTHER, when I committed using fossil commit --branch trunk The command above say: Create a new check-in using my local edits, and put the new check-in on a new branch named trunk. Presumably you already have one branch named trunk. The command above simply created another. and I think something went wrong. In the webui the last commit does appear as descendant of the last trunk commit, but as child of OTHER even if in the branch trunk. I am in autosync mode, it is too late to fix? No. You have not lost any work. Everything can be fixed. And, in general how can I work with distinct branches without merging? I can say: fossil, leave this branch as it is but now I want to work in another one? Always first move your local check-out to the specific version you want to edit: fossil update trunk # Move to the latest trunk check-in fossil update branch-xyz # Move to a branch named branch-xyz fossil update 951f7a6b5f3# Move to a specific check-in 951f7a6b5f3 After your check-out is on the version you want to change, then you start editing. After you make the desired changes, then do fossil commit. Fossil shows what version you currently have checked out in the fossil status command. HOW TO FIX WHAT YOU HAVE ALREADY DONE In the Web-ui, find the anomalous check-in and click on the Edit link. Change it's branch name to something other than trunk. Maybe call the branch mistake or oops. In your check-out do: fossil update trunk That will take your check-out to the latest trunk version. Maybe also run fossil changes to make sure you have in your check-out is exactly what is checked in and has not been edited. If you do have edits, use fossil diff to see them. To get rid of unwanted edits, use fossil revert. Now bring in the changes from the mistake or oops branch: fossil merge --cherrypick oops This imports into your current check-out changes corresponding to the oops check-in (or mistake or whatever you decided to call the anomalous check-in.) Verify that the correct changes were brought in using fossil diff. Once you have everything the way you like it, then do fossil commit to commit those changes to trunk. After editing trunk, if you want to go back and work on the branch again, first do: fossil update branch-xyz Then start editing. Or, you can create a separate directory (someplace else) and open a new check-out on the branch: cd .. mkdir the_branch cd the_branch fossil open ../repos/myrepo.fossil branch-xyz It is fine to have two or three or a hundred different check-outs of Fossil, each pointing at a separate branch. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Abort commit on empty message
Dear list, Something I actually like of git is that to abort a commit you just have to leave the editor without saving. It somewhat works with fossil too, but you have to confirm you want to abort the commit. So, I was wondering, it is possible to abort the commit on empty commit message? yours faithfully, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] ticket that depends on another ticket
Dear list, I am using fossil for bug tracking in a project where (not my decision) we use git for revision control. I was wondering if there is a way to explicitly mark a ticket as children of another. So it is clear that the root one must worked on before the child one. It is possible do something like that? Cheers, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Reorder Ticket report format
Dear list, It is possible to reoder the ticket report format? I made a new one that hides the Fixed issuesa and I would like to show it first. Yours sincerely, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Run fossil behind stunnel?
I remember having this exact problem in the past. The documentation should be improved. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Francis Daly fran...@daoine.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: How do I run fossil behind stunnel? [...] Certainly, putting SSL on Fossil is NOT as simple as just drop it behind stunnel as implied on the web page. Could you provide a link to the web page? Perhaps someone on the list will have access to edit it to be more clear or correct, for the next person. Just looked myself - The Fossil as an inetd/xinetd or stunnel service section on http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/server.wiki There is nothing in that section about the --https option to fossil. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Maybe it is time to leave Windows? On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;). -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...
Or libfeather in honor to the fact we now know all dinosaurs had feathers. ;) Kidding a part I like libfossil, but maybe it is a good occasion to remove the ambiguity with that filesystem. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Gautier DI FOLCO gautier.difo...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/7/30 Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:06 , Stephan Beal wrote: Hi, all, As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i unfortunately dubbed fossil v2. As it turns out, everything i want to do can be done on top of current repos, with no repo-level incompatibilities (so far, at least). That means it's not really v2, but instead provides an alternate interface for v1 repos[1]. That just shows how good is the design :) - libfossil - nothing wrong with that, IMO I'm for this one - just keep things simple. +1 But if you really want a joke call it librush (like stiff brushes use during the fossils cleaning). ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: This is drifting from the point of this thread, but what is modern OO as opposed to C++ style OO? Marketing I am afraid. In C++ many of the concept that other languages give as keywords like: interface or module are set of idioms. Of course whoever is interested in selling other languages will mark the C++ way as older. In the case of Java it becomes ridiculous as the language is more blocked in the '80 vision of OO than C++... ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Compile Fossil with Tiny C Compiler
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i've written the tcc team expressing my amazement at this type of result, but they respond to my excitement with a sober, but the runtime code is not as fast as gcc's. (Also, tcc's warning/error messages are, in general, not nearly as detailed.) Nonetheless, tcc's compile times are absolutely amazing - i regularly see 10x+ increases in compile speed with tcc. I can understand tcc team answer, after all most of the users of a program do not see the compiling time. But it does sound cool for development! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil on https, fix site links
Question, while it was not difficult maybe it might be a good idea to write a wiki article about how to serve fossil via https. What do you think? On 12/27/12, Paolo Bolzoni paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com wrote: I changed the command line in xined adding --https. Now it works fine. Thanks. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff
Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral color and the difference with the usual bright color? I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views. On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Martijn Coppoolse li...@martijn.coppoolse.com wrote: On 17-12-2012 8:33, Baruch Burstein wrote: Another suggestion: Since visual diffs are always for text files (I think), it doesn't make much sense to mark partial words as changed. If the whole word is not unchanged, then the whole word is changed. I am referring to things like line 73817 on the left in the fourth link below. Respectfully disagree. The line you refer to works perfectly fine; I see no reason to reduce granularity to word level, and every reason to keep it the way it works now: if a word is partially changed, I like to see _what_ part was changed. IMO, diff highlighting should highlight changes, not words. I can recognize words by myself just fine; seeing what exactly changed is what I need the highlighting for. Also, in my case (at least), visual diffs are usually for text files representing source code. In code, especially for a case-sensitive language, a change to a single character can be crucial. Reducing highlighting to only indicate changes per word makes it more difficult to see this. On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org mailto:d...@sqlite.org wrote: Reposted from fossil-dev: OLD: http://www2.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 NEW: http://www.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 OLD: http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/fdiff?v1=955cc67ace8fb622v2=e2e1c87b86664b45#chunk24 NEW: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/fdiff?v1=955cc67ace8fb622v2=e2e1c87b86664b45#chunk24 -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎɟı ˙pɐǝɥ ʎɯ uo buıʇʇıs uǝɥʍ ǝuıɟ ʇsnظ uʍop ǝpısdn pɐǝɹ uɐɔ ı ¡ʎןןıs ǝq ʇ’uop -- Martijn Coppoolse ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] server SSL support
On the other hand I think that what has been said in this topic should be in the FAQ of the fossil site. Maybe with a link to an fool proof how-to. 2012/11/13, Cunningham, Robert rcunning...@nsmsurveillance.com: -Original Message- From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users- boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Remigiusz Modrzejewski Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:12 AM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server SSL support On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote: why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff? To keep the core small? A recent survey of apps that provided built-in SSH implementations found that nearly 70% included significant security flaws not present in external packages. The main problems were cutpaste errors, and failure to track updates to borrowed or hard-linked code. On the flip side, including encryption may make your app illegal for export to, or use within, certain countries. If a highly-regarded external app will provide the needed encryption, use it! -BobC ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Questions about fossil
I love fossil and use it in all my projects, and using I got few questions I cannot find the answers... - Can I change the zip archive name in the check-in page? - Can I change the directory name inside the zip archive? - It is possible to change a typo in a commit message in autosync mode? (without dumping the fossil database, changing the dump, remaking it) Thanks, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Default leaf when clicking on ``Files''
Thanks, the /dir=ci=trunk trick is fairly good.
For my situation the ideal would be pointing to the trunk check-in leaf.
But is it good enough, and users might like the file list anyhow.
Bye,
Paolo
2012/9/18, Martijn Coppoolse li...@martijn.coppoolse.com:
On 17-9-2012 19:19, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
I host few small projects on Fossil, and I also use Fossil to distribute
the files.
I openend a branch for an experimental feature I wanted to try.
Now when I click on ``File'' the site does not show the last check-in
of Trunk, but the last check-in of the experimental branch.
Is there a way to set that Files shows the files of the trunk leaf?
So visitors can download the ``stable'' version with ease?
Yes. Under the [Admin] section, edit the 'Header' HTML.
In that HTML, there, you'll find the following code to create the
'Files' menu:
if {[hascap oh]} {
menulink dir /dir?ci=tip Files
}
If you change /dir?ci=tip to /dir?ci=trunk, clicking the 'Files'
button will show all the files of 'trunk':
if {[hascap oh]} {
menulink dir /dir?ci=trunk Files
}
If you change it to /dir (leaving out the 'ci' parameter altogether),
you'll get the list of files across all the versions; and clicking on a
single file will lead to that file's history, instead of the contents of
one specific version. It’s probably not what you want in the case you
describe.
HTH,
--
Martijn Coppoolse
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Default leaf when clicking on ``Files''
I host few small projects on Fossil, and I also use Fossil to distribute the files. I openend a branch for an experimental feature I wanted to try. Now when I click on ``File'' the site does not show the last check-in of Trunk, but the last check-in of the experimental branch. Is there a way to set that Files shows the files of the trunk leaf? So visitors can download the ``stable'' version with ease? Thanks. Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Using althttpd.c
Today I tried to use althttpd.c as HTTP server for serving few fossil
scm. But I cannot execute CGI scripts.
The althttpd.c file I am speaking of is this one:
http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/artifact/14c9965da19e83baeba2cd81b6459f3948f73794
So I downloaded it, compiled it, copied in /usr/local/bin/httpd .
My distribution uses xinetd so I made a configuration file to start httpd.
Here is the configuration file content:
service http
{
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
port = 80
wait = no
user = root
group = root
server = /usr/bin/httpd
server_args = -logfile logfile -root /home/paolo/tmp -user nobody
}
I set the root directory as /home/paolo/tmp just as test.
Inside the directory /home/paolo/tmp/default.website are two files:
a.txt a text file
b.sh a script with this content:
-
#!/bin/sh
echo A
-
Now once I start xinetd if I go to 127.0.0.1 with my browser
the server greets me saying there is no document in / that is fine.
Also 127.0.0.1/a.txt works fine, but if I try 127.0.0.1/b.sh the page
loads for some seconds and it shows an empty page.
What I am doing wrong? Why the CGI does not work?
I thought if could be a problem with the root jail but
even if I copy sh in the default.website directory and change
the interpreter to #!/sh nothing changes.
Help please.
Thanks
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil halts before push.
I executed `fossil --httptrace sync' and waited until `netstat -tu' shown an empty list. A request was sent and it never got a reply, suggesting that the server is stuck in a loop or something. Can you verify that the server process is still running? Well, if there was no server process the website should not appear at all. And the website is working. Fossil normally tries to limit each HTTP round-trip to 5MB or less. Did you change this in your settings? Or do you have an 80MB file that you are trying to check in? Nope, I did not changed any technical setting. I only changed something for users. And yes, I have a single 80MB file that are the results of a long numerical experiment (an Octave session). I read something about sqlite and fossil limits and I recall them much larger than that. I do not know if it counts, but the Settings webpage under max-uploads shows 25. I know that the above won't work on my server because I have my server configured to silently discard HTTP requests that are larger than a few MB - as a security measure. What web server are you using? Do you have size limits configured? I am using thttpd 2.25b. I had to make a little patch because thttpd does not set the HTTP_HOST variable for CGI scripts correctly as explained in this mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg02119.html And the configuration file contains: dir=/home/srv/thttpd data_dir=/home/srv/thttpd cgipat=fossil/** logfile=/var/log/thttpd/thttpd_log pidfile=/var/run/thttpd.pid port= I read again the man page, but I could not find anything interesting about size limits. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil halts before push.
From: d...@sqlite.org Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:38:03 -0400 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil halts before push. Please run this experiment for me: scp the repository from your server down to your local machine. Call it (say) copy.fossil. Then run fossil ui copy.fossil. Then in a separate window, go to your check-out and run fossil push --once http://localhost:8080/;. In other words, please try doing the same push using only the loop-back interface and the web server that is built into fossil. Please let us know whether or not that works. It worked fine, I just added the name and password: $ fossil push --once 'http://A:B@localhost:8080' Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 4270 91 0 0 Received: 126 3 0 0 Sent: 79242063 92 1 0 Received: 79 2 0 0 Sent: 5076 91 0 1 Received: 32 1 0 0 Total network traffic: 18176299 bytes sent, 855 bytes received Considering the total network traffic it even seems there is some kind of compression. So... I can assume is there an thttpd bug somewhere? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil halts before push.
Ops... I was obviously sleepy for not noticing that. Thanks, I try to wait longer. Considering the speed of my connection I have probably to wait about half hour. Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:55:05 +0200 From: jo...@britannica.bec.de To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil halts before push. On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: I am using fossil version [0448438c56] 2011-05-28 18:51:22 UTC and when I try to push one of my projects fossil hangs on the 'waiting for server' phase. How fast is the connection? According to the output, it tries to write almost 80MB, that can take a while. Joerg ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Fossil halts before push.
I am using fossil version [0448438c56] 2011-05-28 18:51:22 UTC and when I try to push one of my projects fossil hangs on the 'waiting for server' phase. Copy 'n' pasted: $ fossil push Server: X Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 4270 91 0 0 Received: 126 3 0 0 Sent: 79242063 92 1 0 waiting for server...^C I waited some whole minutes before pressing CTRL-C. I have no idea of the problem, the same server hosts another two lines cgi script with another fossil repo and it works fine, What can I try? thanks ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Change mime type of an artifact.
Browsing the source I see there is an optional parameter in the /raw page called `m'. But I did not find a way to change the default mime for a certain artifact. Is it possible? The page address is: /raw?name=ARTIFACTIDm=TYPE And I read about it in the source file info.c. I my repository there is few text files that are downloaded as pdf files so I'd like to change the default mime with the classical text/plain. Thanks Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] fossil push 302 error.
$ fossil push Server: http://pa...@www.example.net/fossil/books Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Send: 67653989 48 2 0 fossil: location: missing from 302 redirect reply I got this error, I simple have no idea how to try to work it out, nor what it does mean. In this repo I put few fairly large files (.pdf), but I should be well under the sqlite limits as all the books are less than 1gb and each one is about 50MB. Any insight? Thanks ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] 401 Error cloning a repository from a http server with auth.
dear list, I would like to use fossil as cgi program on a thttpd server. The problem is that it seems fossil cannot connect to a server that requires authorization. This problem manifests only when using the command line, when I use fossil via web browser it works fine. In other words, when I browse (with firefox or elinks) this address it works fine: http://name:p...@www.example.org/fossil/project1 when I use this command in my command line it does not: fossil clone http://name:p...@www.example.org/fossil/project1 project1 fossil answers 401. In other to use the authorization feature of thttpd I made a .htpasswd using htpasswd. What I am doing wrong? Thanks Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
