Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode
Am 03.02.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Sven Barth: > On 03.02.2016 20:07, Tomas Hajny wrote: >> On Wed, February 3, 2016 20:00, Sven Barth wrote: >>> On 03.02.2016 16:58, Schindler Karl-Michael wrote: >> . >> . How about his suggestion about renaming the mode to iso7185? Too late? >>> >>> We could maybe add iso7185 as an alternative to iso and deprecate the >>> latter... >>> How about calling ExtendedPascal iso10206 instead of extpas? >>> >>> Since Extended Pascal supported is only in trunk that would be no >>> problem... >> >> Not really important for me personally, but I wonder: Would all/most >> potential users remember the ISO standard numbers when typing command line >> parameters, or is it better to include the ISO number just in the help >> pages and documentation, but keep the mode name as it is to simplify it >> for users? > > Yeah, that's a thought I had as well. This was one of the reasons why I have chosen the short names. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: > > Yeah, that's a thought I had as well. Then again those two modes are > probably only going to be used by people who know what they're doing... :/ Btw, ISO is not in -h, not even in trunk. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Panel Top Negative Limitation.
Am 04.02.2016 10:48 schrieb : > > Hi > I have a problem using a panel, that is large say 7. > If I try to bring areas of this into the view area by using panel.top:=-avalue, this works fine until you hit –32769; at which point the panel vanishes. > How can this be corrected; or is there a workaround? > > I have a forum thread; where I have attached simple project demonstrating the problem. > http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,31355.msg200797.html#msg200797 You should ask this in the Lazarus mailing list, not the one related to compiler development. Regards, Sven ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] Panel Top Negative Limitation.
Hi I have a problem using a panel, that is large say 7. If I try to bring areas of this into the view area by using panel.top:=-avalue, this works fine until you hit –32769; at which point the panel vanishes. How can this be corrected; or is there a workaround? I have a forum thread; where I have attached simple project demonstrating the problem. http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,31355.msg200797.html#msg200797 Any thoughts appreciated. Josh___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] ifthen bugs (maybe)
On 04/02/16 05:22, Martin wrote: //writeln(b in ifthen( true , [1,2] , [3.4])); // internal error Maybe that's not related to the fact that you use ifthen, but because you have [3.4] instead of [3,4]? Jonas ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode
> Am 04.02.2016 um 02:40 schrieb fpc-devel-requ...@lists.freepascal.org: > > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:00:11 +0100 > From: Sven Barth > Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode > Message-ID: <56b24e3b.4040...@googlemail.com> > >>> It looks good now, the differences are allowed by the standard (precision, >>> case). > > Does anyone know what he means with "precision" and "case"? The output differs from the reference output. Some real numbers may have some more or different, but insignificant digits. Also the case of some letters is different. Michael. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel