Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?
I tested it in my laptop. Everything works however just as the previous version. I didn't see any bug in my machine fixed. Anyway I think it is worth to check in. Jun Su _ Do You Yahoo!? 更多惊喜，同样精彩，NetVista A30 热卖 http://ad.cn.doubleclick.net/clk;5313999;7930402;p?http://www.ibm.com/cn/promotion/pc/netvista_a30/index.shtml To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?
It seems Takanori Watanabe wrote: > Would you try it? > > http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff > http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz Just did here, ASUS P4S8X board, With the CVS version power off doesnt work, it prints the "power system off using ACPI" waits a couble seconds, prints that the ACPI poweroff function timed out and reboots :( With the above applied it is even worse, it prints the "power system off using ACPI" and then hangs the system without powering off :( :( Besides this both seems to work, except they both find dual CPU's which I dont have :) -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?
Would you try it? http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz The OSD interface of void AcpiOsDerivePciId(ACPI_HANDLE Rhandle, ACPI_HANDLE Lhandle, ACPI_PCI_ID **Id) is not impremented yet. (Only Do-Nothing function) If this is impremented, PCI-PCI bridge handling on ACPI-CA is will be better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Gr
over, Andrew" wrote:
>> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp>
>i/downloads/CHANGES.txt
>>
>> I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from
>> iwasaki@
Iwasaki seems to be busy now.
>
>This is against the Linuxized version but you should be able to get the
>gist of it:
>
>--- 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c.orig Wed Mar 5
>17:00:15 2003
>+++ 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c Wed Mar 5
>17:01:30 2003
>@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
> /* Ensure that we have a valid GPE number for this GPE block */
>
> if ((gpe_number < gpe_block->block_base_number) ||
>- (gpe_number >= (gpe_block->register_count * 8))) {
>+ (gpe_number - gpe_block->block_base_number >=
>(gpe_block->register_count * 8))) {
>
Thanks. I'll apply it.
BTW. I noticed that some definition for structure is added and
its naming collide to our OS-dependent module.
We has been avoided it by using non-linuxlized ACPI-CA that
has the naming rule of beggining with 'Acpi' not 'acpi_'.
Would you care about it next time?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
