Version control software (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.)
On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 16:44:06 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:51:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: Bitkeeper enforces the linux devleopment model to a large extent, In what way(s)? I'd be interested in this too. I've been using Bitkeeper for, well, Linux development, but I don't see anything which locks it in to that direction. Of course, Bitkeeper isn't free either, so there's no particular reason to prefer it to p4. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: Version control software (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.)
Greg Lehey wrote: On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 16:44:06 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:51:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: Bitkeeper enforces the linux devleopment model to a large extent, In what way(s)? I'd be interested in this too. I've been using Bitkeeper for, well, Linux development, but I don't see anything which locks it in to that direction. Of course, Bitkeeper isn't free either, so there's no particular reason to prefer it to p4. Bitkeeper is free if you publish your repository; P4 is free if you are a free software project. Otherwise, they cost. Both are barriers to commercial utilization of free code, in the same way. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message