Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3
I'm not sure if it's before or after your changes, Poul-Henning. If there is a newer -RELEASE I can upgrade too, I will do that. I don't really want to upgrade to -STABLE, but I will also do that to relieve the issue if necessary. Just give me a recommendation on to either update RELEASE beyond -p1 or to go ahead and update to -STABLE. I appreciate the help all of you have been. Thanks much. On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:52:38PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: > > >> I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and > >> open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a > >> tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, but was unable to get a dump. > >> Scott has since fixed dumps with twe, but I've not yet been able to get > >> the bug to recur. I'll give it another try. > > > >Sounds very plausible. Does Poul-Henning have any ideas? > > Is this before or after my tty changes ? > > There is a general nastyness about ttys/sessions/exit which I have > never really felt comfortable about. My hope is that I have solved > it by refcounting the tty structure. > > So if this is before my changes: "Yeah, known (but rare) issue)" > > If after my changes: "D**N!" > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- William Michael Grim Student, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville Unix Network Administrator, SIUE, Computer Science dept. Phone: (217) 341-6552 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: > > >> I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and > >> open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a > >> tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, but was unable to get a dump. > >> Scott has since fixed dumps with twe, but I've not yet been able to get > >> the bug to recur. I'll give it another try. > > > >Sounds very plausible. Does Poul-Henning have any ideas? > > Is this before or after my tty changes ? > > There is a general nastyness about ttys/sessions/exit which I have never > really felt comfortable about. My hope is that I have solved it by > refcounting the tty structure. > > So if this is before my changes: "Yeah, known (but rare) issue)" > > If after my changes: "D**N!" The instance of the panic I saw was in RELENG_5 in January when using a serial console. Here's a copy of the e-mail I sent to stable@ when it occurred. It's a little weak on the debugging side because I couldn't get a dump and didn't have a kernel with symbols easily on hand, but my reading was that there was a race relating to open/close and device events. Robert N M Watson Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:51:14 + (GMT) From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NULL pointer deref in sioopen() suggests a close/open race on sio device? Ran into the following panic on a 5-STABLE box this morning, which occurred after hitting Ctrl-D to close a login session on a serial console (ttyd0 at 9600 bps): login: Jan 23 10:43:27 fledge login: 2 LOGIN FAILURES ON ttyd0 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x1c fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc051537b stack pointer = 0x10:0xe7345988 frame pointer = 0x10:0xe7345994 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 45092 (getty) [thread pid 45092 tid 100201 ] Stopped at knote+0x27: cmpxchgl%ecx,0x1c(%edx) db> show pcpu cpuid= 0 curthread= 0xc290d190: pid 45092 "getty" curpcb = 0xe7345da0 fpcurthread = 0xc290d190: pid 45092 "getty" idlethread = 0xc22644b0: pid 11 "idle" APIC ID = 0 currentldt = 0x30 db> trace Tracing pid 45092 tid 100201 td 0xc290d190 knote(c264e098,0,0,c290d190,e73459c4) at knote+0x27 ttwwakeup(c264e000) at ttwwakeup+0xc8 comstart(c264e000) at comstart+0x385 comparam(c264e000,c264e0a4,c264e000,3,0) at comparam+0x253 sioopen(c079f060,3,2000,c290d190,c078e6a0) at sioopen+0x1df spec_open(e7345a84,e7345b40,c058d585,e7345a84,180) at spec_open+0x2b6 spec_vnoperate(e7345a84) at spec_vnoperate+0x13 vn_open_cred(e7345be4,e7345ce4,c08,c2261d80,0) at vn_open_cred+0x419 vn_open(e7345be4,e7345ce4,c08,0,c4289b58) at vn_open+0x1e kern_open(c290d190,804f8e0,0,3,bfbfee18) at kern_open+0xe3 open(c290d190,e7345d14,3,0,292) at open+0x18 syscall(2f,2f,2f,804f8e0,0) at syscall+0x27b Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (5, FreeBSD ELF32, open), eip = 0x280d155b, esp = 0xbfbfedec, ebp = 0xbfbfee18 --- The ps list is a bit boring, but the primary interesting thing is that it looks like the close was going on in one thread just about when the sio swi was scheduled to run also: db> ps pid proc uarea uid ppid pgrp flag stat wmesgwchan cmd 45092 c6762388 e73870000 1 1 0004000 [CPU 0] getty ... 132 c235954c e4fbf0000 0 0 20c [RUNQ] swi5: clock sio I didn't have a kernel with debugging symbols on-hand, but the above address in knote() is a cmpxchg early in the function, which means it's likely the conditional call to mtx_lock() hitting a NULL mutex pointer for kl_lock. This in turn suggests that something has called ttyrel/tty_close on the TTY in a race with the open, or otherwise NULL'd that pointer via knlist_destroy(). Anyone have any pointers on this one? The TTY code is not my forte... Robert N M Watson ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: >> I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and >> open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a >> tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, but was unable to get a dump. >> Scott has since fixed dumps with twe, but I've not yet been able to get >> the bug to recur. I'll give it another try. > >Sounds very plausible. Does Poul-Henning have any ideas? Is this before or after my tty changes ? There is a general nastyness about ttys/sessions/exit which I have never really felt comfortable about. My hope is that I have solved it by refcounting the tty structure. So if this is before my changes: "Yeah, known (but rare) issue)" If after my changes: "D**N!" -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3
On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:03 pm, Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday 31 March 2005 03:38 pm, William Michael Grim wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I keep having kernel panics every couple weeks on my system. It occurs > > > in the sched_switch() function. There are several other statements in > > > the backtrace involving "??"; what are those? > > > > > > I have attached the dump output and system info to this email. Any > > > feedback would be helpful. > > > > > > Thanks so much for your help. > > > > The real trace ends with Xint0x80_syscall(). The rest after that is > > garbage memory. Your real problem is in exit1() or ttywakeup(). Since > > ttywakeup() doesn't call exit1() (AFAIK), the exit1() frame is probably > > bogus (gdb doesn't grok trapframes maybe?) and the real bug is a NULL > > pointer deref in ttywakeup(). Perhaps it's a bug in the ptc driver? > > (ptcopen is in the trace). What is the ptc driver anyway? > > I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and > open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a > tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, but was unable to get a dump. > Scott has since fixed dumps with twe, but I've not yet been able to get > the bug to recur. I'll give it another try. Sounds very plausible. Does Poul-Henning have any ideas? -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 31 March 2005 03:38 pm, William Michael Grim wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I keep having kernel panics every couple weeks on my system. It occurs in > > the sched_switch() function. There are several other statements in the > > backtrace involving "??"; what are those? > > > > I have attached the dump output and system info to this email. Any > > feedback would be helpful. > > > > Thanks so much for your help. > > The real trace ends with Xint0x80_syscall(). The rest after that is > garbage memory. Your real problem is in exit1() or ttywakeup(). Since > ttywakeup() doesn't call exit1() (AFAIK), the exit1() frame is probably > bogus (gdb doesn't grok trapframes maybe?) and the real bug is a NULL > pointer deref in ttywakeup(). Perhaps it's a bug in the ptc driver? > (ptcopen is in the trace). What is the ptc driver anyway? I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, but was unable to get a dump. Scott has since fixed dumps with twe, but I've not yet been able to get the bug to recur. I'll give it another try. Robert N M Watson ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3
On Thursday 31 March 2005 03:38 pm, William Michael Grim wrote: > Hello. > > I keep having kernel panics every couple weeks on my system. It occurs in > the sched_switch() function. There are several other statements in the > backtrace involving "??"; what are those? > > I have attached the dump output and system info to this email. Any > feedback would be helpful. > > Thanks so much for your help. The real trace ends with Xint0x80_syscall(). The rest after that is garbage memory. Your real problem is in exit1() or ttywakeup(). Since ttywakeup() doesn't call exit1() (AFAIK), the exit1() frame is probably bogus (gdb doesn't grok trapframes maybe?) and the real bug is a NULL pointer deref in ttywakeup(). Perhaps it's a bug in the ptc driver? (ptcopen is in the trace). What is the ptc driver anyway? -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"