Re: nss compat shims

2012-06-09 Thread Mel Flynn
On 8-6-2012 22:06, Michael Bushkov wrote:

> I don't know for sure, but it seems that there was no need to support
> anything besides groups and password when nss_compat.c was committed.
> At that time, IIRC, the modules that we had in ports supported only
> these databases.

Right. In the meantime hosts has been implemented in nss-pam-ldapd but
currently does not work (at least on 9). It's been the author's concern
too whether services/protocols etc is a needed feature, but I guess you
won't find that out until you provide the feature. At least it seems
logical to me to keep the nss_compat interface synchronized with the
APIs that call nsdispatch. I guess I'll make patches for both.

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: nss compat shims

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Bushkov
I don't know for sure, but it seems that there was no need to support
anything besides groups and password when nss_compat.c was committed.
At that time, IIRC, the modules that we had in ports supported only
these databases.

--
Michael

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Mel Flynn  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently implementing support for more NSS databases in
> net/nss-pamd-ldapd and I've started to wonder why there's only the group
> and password support in lib/libc/net/nss_compat.c?
>
> Is there a specific reason for it or is this a classic case of "patches
> welcome"? I wasn't able to determine the reason from the commit log.
> --
> Mel
> ___
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


nss compat shims

2012-06-07 Thread Mel Flynn
Hi,

I'm currently implementing support for more NSS databases in
net/nss-pamd-ldapd and I've started to wonder why there's only the group
and password support in lib/libc/net/nss_compat.c?

Is there a specific reason for it or is this a classic case of "patches
welcome"? I wasn't able to determine the reason from the commit log.
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"