Re: Xorg 7.2 index problem
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:45:56AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > # make index > Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..cut: stdin: Illegal byte sequence > "Makefile", line 32: warning: "/usr/bin/cut -f 1 -d '|' < > /usr/ports/audio/mbrolavox/voices.conf" returned non-zero status > > Does anyone else have this problem? Do you have a nonstandard locale set, and does this warning also occur with CVS index? Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Xorg 7.2 index problem
# make index Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..cut: stdin: Illegal byte sequence "Makefile", line 32: warning: "/usr/bin/cut -f 1 -d '|' < /usr/ports/audio/mbrolavox/voices.conf" returned non-zero status Does anyone else have this problem? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3
Hi, Paul Laudanski wrote: > Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2. > Please let me know where I can help. Thanks for your offer. Currently we are in a ports freeze (which means that only a selected subset of port committers and the security team can commit during the period) in preparision for the upcoming Xorg 7.2 import, which will take some time to be finished. The FreeBSD Security Team is already aware of the issue, and the upgrade is already being working on. For those who concern about the upgrade urgently please consult http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112527 for patch. Cheers, -- Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3
On 5/10/07, Paul Laudanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2. Please let me know where I can help. A PR has already been submitted: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112527 We are in a ports freeze due to the xorg 7.2 import. When the freeze is over, the pending PRs will be commited. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2. Please let me know where I can help. - -- Paul Laudanski, CastleCops®, www.castlecops.com Submit Phish: www.castlecops.com/pirt http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGQ+4rHP6ZmSxUymURAkoqAJ96r3Lxeb9a/p1aHXQ2qroS49Zy3gCfW1td mNMfGOKx+PjuOqmrE4d/5uo= =fLy4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: Dear porters, We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we need now is for everyone to download this tarball: http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin the upgrade process. Amendment to the instructions: XORG_UPGRADE must be set before the portupgrade -Rf libXft. Kris Well, bottoms up to the upgrade. Lessee how the experience is.. Many thanks to all of the maintainers for finally getting this out. It's been a while since FreeBSD's been up to date in terms of its X11 distribution :). -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Dear porters, > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz > > Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your > existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin > the upgrade process. Amendment to the instructions: XORG_UPGRADE must be set before the portupgrade -Rf libXft. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:28:57PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb > > > > In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-) > > Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan. And it's not clear what the diff is against. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:03:16AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: >> On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: Dear porters, We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we need now is for everyone to download this tarball: http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz >>> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb >> http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb >> >> In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-) > > Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan. Was about to say the same. -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:03:16AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Dear porters, > >> > >> We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > >> done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > >> remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > >> can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > >> need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz > > > >http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb > > In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-) Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Dear porters, > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Dear porters, > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Friday 11 May 2007 00:26:31 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:11 +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: > > On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Dear porters, > > > > > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > > > done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > > > remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > > > can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > > > need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz > > > > > > Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your > > > existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this require that the tarball is > > extracted over existing /usr/ports? Using portupgrade etc. > > No. DO NOT EXTRACT OVER EXISTING /usr/ports as this will cause patch > problems. Instead, set the PORTSDIR environment variable to the > fully-qualified path to this new location. For example: > > # cd /space/xorg/ports > # tar -xjf ports-xorg-7.2.tbz > # setenv PORTSDIR `realpath .` > > The realpath is important so as to resolve symlinks. OK, thanks. This wasn't very clear. Dan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:11 +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: > On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Dear porters, > > > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > > done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > > remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > > can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > > need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz > > > > Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your > > existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this require that the tarball is > extracted over existing /usr/ports? Using portupgrade etc. No. DO NOT EXTRACT OVER EXISTING /usr/ports as this will cause patch problems. Instead, set the PORTSDIR environment variable to the fully-qualified path to this new location. For example: # cd /space/xorg/ports # tar -xjf ports-xorg-7.2.tbz # setenv PORTSDIR `realpath .` The realpath is important so as to resolve symlinks. Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Dear porters, > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many > remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we > can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we > need now is for everyone to download this tarball: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz > > Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your > existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this require that the tarball is extracted over existing /usr/ports? Using portupgrade etc. Dan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing
Dear porters, We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in. What we need now is for everyone to download this tarball: http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin the upgrade process. In particular, please pay special attention to the instructions on how to record and report information should something go wrong: without a transcript of the upgrade session we may be unable to determine what went wrong on your system, and your report may be wasted. We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash it on the general user base. Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into CVS. Kris pgpU3edGC2KUc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD Port: delegate-9.5.6 problem
Hello! Сергей Святкин wrote on 10-5-2007 5:39: > Hello! > > The problem when start under freebsd 6.2 > > # uname -a > FreeBSD mail.svgc.ru 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Apr 4 10:02:02 > SAMST 2007 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAILKERNEL i386 > > install delegated from ports: > > # cd /usr/ports/net/delegate > # make install > > then try to start: > > # delegated > DeleGate/9.5.6 (April 5, 2007) > AIST-Product-ID: 2000-ETL-198715-01, H14PRO-049, H15PRO-165, H18PRO-443 > Copyright (c) 1994-2000 Yutaka Sato and ETL,AIST,MITI > Copyright (c) 2001-2006 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and > Technology (AIST) > Thank you for the report. Stripping the binary seems to invalidate the internal checksum check. I will send in an update for the port to not strip the binary for the time being. You can do this yourself by adding to the Makefile: 'STRIP= ' after the PLIST_FILES line. Greets, Nils ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Startup script's race condition with zabbix over MySQL
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:16:28 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello, > > I've set up a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE Box to act as a zabbix server. > > The relevant packages I use are: > > zabbix-1.1.7,1 > mysql-server-5.0.37 > > Fisrt of all, both software works properly, my setup run well if I > run them manually via /usr/local/etc/rc.d. No error messages. > > But I had a problem when I put the MySQL and zabbix_server services > to run in /etc/rc.conf, in order to start them at startup. They belong in /usr/local/etc/rc.d > In fact the MySQL start first, and then the zabbix-server follows > immediately, which makes sense, (I made it sure by adding "# REQUIRE > mysql", without quotes, to the head > of /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix-server script). So the logic startup > order is respected. > > But, at every boot, my zabbix-server daemon won't start, the zabbix's > log file saying "could not connect to socket "/tmp/mysql.sock"". So I > put a dirty "sleep 10" in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix_server script, > just after variables declarations, and now it works well at each > startup. > > Does some of you guys have a better method to fix this race-condition > behavior (maybe a "file exists" condition over the /tmp/mysql.sock > file or so), in the zabbix_server FreeBSD startup script ? I would suggest you you write a new script that's ordered between the two, and waits for the socket. That avoids having to maintain any modifications to port installed scripts. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: xqf-1.0.5
FYI, XQF 1.0.5 does *require* qstat 2.11 (current qstat port is 2.10). Just confirmed this on a FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE setup. XQF would not query any master or game servers until I upgraded my qstat port to 2.11. Changes made to qstat-2.10 port: 'Makefile': - PORTVERSION=2.10 + PORTVERSION=2.11 'distinfo': - MD5 (qstat-2.10.tar.gz) = ac3ce3dbed5248bd5738a4968460880e - SHA256 (qstat-2.10.tar.gz) = c86c12465dac1efbab7e0d2f84a5fc5388f7057e9cf09a2253cc88730ca1476c - SIZE (qstat-2.10.tar.gz) = 228886 + MD5 (qstat-2.11.tar.gz) = 26c09831660ef9049fe74b786b80d091 + SHA256 (qstat-2.11.tar.gz) = 16f0c0f55567597d7f2db5136a0858c56effb4481a2c821a48cd0432ea572150 + SIZE (qstat-2.11.tar.gz) = 258335 No other changes were needed. XQF worked fine after that. -- Stefan T. Peters ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: wildfire-3.2.4
On Sunday, 6 May 2007 at 14:12:34 +0300, Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > On Thursday, 3 May 2007 at 16:01:27 -0400, Brandon McCorkle wrote: > >Hi Quetzal, > > > > > > > >I was curious if you were working on a openfire 3.3.0 > >port in FreeBSD? It's my understanding that it needs Java 1.6 now and I > >didn't see a Java port for this version in BSD so I was curious if 3.3.0 > >was going to happen. Thanks for all your hard work, the 3.2.4 port has > >been working beautifully for us. > > > > > > > > > > > >Brandon > > > > > > > > > > Hi Brandon. I currently working on this :) Hi Brandon. Could you please look at this post: http://www.igniterealtime.org/forum/thread.jspa?threadID=26442 -- == - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. <<<--- == ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Startup script's race condition with zabbix over MySQL
Hello, I've set up a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE Box to act as a zabbix server. The relevant packages I use are: zabbix-1.1.7,1 mysql-server-5.0.37 Fisrt of all, both software works properly, my setup run well if I run them manually via /usr/local/etc/rc.d. No error messages. But I had a problem when I put the MySQL and zabbix_server services to run in /etc/rc.conf, in order to start them at startup. In fact the MySQL start first, and then the zabbix-server follows immediately, which makes sense, (I made it sure by adding "# REQUIRE mysql", without quotes, to the head of /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix-server script). So the logic startup order is respected. But, at every boot, my zabbix-server daemon won't start, the zabbix's log file saying "could not connect to socket "/tmp/mysql.sock"". So I put a dirty "sleep 10" in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix_server script, just after variables declarations, and now it works well at each startup. Does some of you guys have a better method to fix this race-condition behavior (maybe a "file exists" condition over the /tmp/mysql.sock file or so), in the zabbix_server FreeBSD startup script ? Another issue I found is when zabbix exits after claiming /tmp/mysql.sock doesn't exists, it leave its PID file on /var/tmp/zabbix_server.pid, which avoid also starting zabbix_server, even manually by rc.d script, if we don't remove it before. P.S: sorry for my "English" Cheers, Laurent CLIGNY ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-session-5.2.1_3
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:00:06AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Do you know that PHP 5.2.1 has a "Security Enhancements and Fixes in > PHP 5.2.2 and PHP 4.4.7" as reported on www.php.net? When will be > available the PHP 5.2.2 in the ports? Please go read the archives of this mailing list over the past 24 hours. Thanks. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: php5-session-5.2.1_3
Do you know that PHP 5.2.1 has a "Security Enhancements and Fixes in PHP 5.2.2 and PHP 4.4.7" as reported on www.php.net? When will be available the PHP 5.2.2 in the ports? I have got a webserver with a vulnerable PHP version on it (5.2.1) and I'm scared. Giovanni ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php 5.2.2
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:25:56AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote: > On 10/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:48:30AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> The latest release of PHP is out (as at May 3) and I'm just wondering if > >> there's a schedule for updating the port - this release corrects some not > >> insignificant security vulnerabilities. > > > >We are in an unusual ports freeze to do the preliminary work to import > >the xorg7.2 release, so at the moment we are holding off on this. We > >are, however, aware of the issue. > > > >mcl > >___ > >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > As much as I (and I hope all of us) appreciate the effort to include > xorg7.2, this leaves many productive systems vulnerable. I have not > yet found an update on the progress of the xorg7.2 work but I'm > anxious to find out when we can expect the ports tree to be unfrozen. > > Can anyone supply us with a timeline for php 5.2.2? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112527 Just apply it, relax, and stop bugging us. Thanks :) Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php 5.2.2
On 10/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:48:30AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The latest release of PHP is out (as at May 3) and I'm just wondering if > there's a schedule for updating the port - this release corrects some not > insignificant security vulnerabilities. We are in an unusual ports freeze to do the preliminary work to import the xorg7.2 release, so at the moment we are holding off on this. We are, however, aware of the issue. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" As much as I (and I hope all of us) appreciate the effort to include xorg7.2, this leaves many productive systems vulnerable. I have not yet found an update on the progress of the xorg7.2 work but I'm anxious to find out when we can expect the ports tree to be unfrozen. Can anyone supply us with a timeline for php 5.2.2? Kind regards, Spil. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
