Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier

[Mark Linimon]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister".  I
> dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in
> charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their
> name(s) are?

Most of your questions are probably answered on http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/.

With the addition of another 10,000 or so ports, things have gotten more
formalized over time :-)

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: make config-conditional recursive ?

[Yi Wang]

I wrote a simple script some months ago. You could try it by yourself.

If you find any bug in the script, please let me know. Thanks!


On 12/14/07, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is make config-conditional recursive ?
> If not, shouldn't there be something like config-conditional-recursive ?
>
> My idea is to run something like the following to configure ports before
> upgrading a significant number of them:
>
> portupgrade -n -B 'make config-conditional' pkg1 pkg2 ...
>
> --
> Andriy Gapon
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>


-- 
Regards,
Wang Yi
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier

[Jeremy Messenger]

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:36:32 -0600, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister".  I
dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person  
is in
charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what  
their

name(s) are?


s/portsmgr/portmgr/g (without 's')

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staff-listing.html  
(3.2)


Cheers,
Mezz

In case you're curious (nosy, aren't you?) I need to ask questions about  
the
official attitude with regards to the install hierarchy to be followed  
for
Linux applications.  I need more than just opinions, else I'd just ask  
here,
but I need to know, officially, what it is.  IF I can get it nailed  
down, and
if it ends up the way I would like it, I will go ahead and invest all  
the time
it takes, to fix every port I see that I think is broken, but I won't  
start

doing this until I get official word on RIGHT WAY.

Oh, BTW, I don't intend sneaking anything in, but I am not going to do  
the
work unless I find out if the work (if it does like I ask) would be  
accepted.


Darn, I can see 6 different ways to misinterpret that.  Ah, heck, it'll  
be
easier to reply to all the accusations, than try to explain it all up  
front.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHaxigz62J6PPcoOkRAltuAJ0c14uXXocEzIX3zwXY6VUc+EI9fACfWMcT
QHXnAixnorYljynmcdO4AAk=
=Icxf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier

[Edwin Groothuis]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister".  I
> dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in
> charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their
> name(s) are?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the right email address.

Or try #bsdports of the Efnet IRC network, three of them are hanging
out there during various times of the day.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis  |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|  Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier

[Aryeh M. Friedman]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


> Darn, I can see 6 different ways to misinterpret that.  Ah, heck,
> it'll be easier to reply to all the accusations, than try to
> explain it all up front.
Welecome to my delima with ports2
- --
Aryeh M. Friedman
FloSoft Systems
http://www.flosoft-systems.com
Developer, not business, friendly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHaxn4zIOMjAek4JIRAhbYAKCIoH0A3wGVVen6/fDsfF3XMitcbwCfdiTJ
FshCEByNlU24WJXllV2vWWM=
=OBOk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier

[Chuck Robey]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister".  I
dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in
charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their
name(s) are?

In case you're curious (nosy, aren't you?) I need to ask questions about the
official attitude with regards to the install hierarchy to be followed for
Linux applications.  I need more than just opinions, else I'd just ask here,
but I need to know, officially, what it is.  IF I can get it nailed down, and
if it ends up the way I would like it, I will go ahead and invest all the time
it takes, to fix every port I see that I think is broken, but I won't start
doing this until I get official word on RIGHT WAY.

Oh, BTW, I don't intend sneaking anything in, but I am not going to do the
work unless I find out if the work (if it does like I ask) would be accepted.

Darn, I can see 6 different ways to misinterpret that.  Ah, heck, it'll be
easier to reply to all the accusations, than try to explain it all up front.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHaxigz62J6PPcoOkRAltuAJ0c14uXXocEzIX3zwXY6VUc+EI9fACfWMcT
QHXnAixnorYljynmcdO4AAk=
=Icxf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

[Rick Voland]

Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>>  This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is
>>  trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive.  As I explained,
>>  if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have
>>  to be added at a time, so testing them should be done in a separate
>>  tree at least.  I hope I will be able to set up a public tree for
>>  testing and collaborative work this month...
>>
>>  Any comments are welcome.  Thanks.
> 
> As I'm not doing any work, my vote doesn't count, but please: Creating
> 2-3 *big* TeXLive ports is certainly wrong, but creating 1000 tiny ports
> is equally wrong. Think about the repo bloat and churn introduced by a
> "single" software like a LaTeX system. It will slow down everything from
> cvs checkout, to index building and pkg_info(1).
> 
> Can't you split the TeXLive Distribution up into say 12 ports? Something
> minimal that can be used by other ports to typeset documentation (how
> common is this, anyway?) and 3-4 big TeXLive ports for the typical TeX
> user.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ulrich Spoerlein



I am also only a user of TeX and friends.

May I suggest some categories for triage?


1) Simple packages like envlab and lettrine are easy to locate and
install afterwards.  So, maybe these packages (and others like
additional fonts) don't need to be in the typical TeXLive port for FreeBSD.

2) Binaries for features like xetex and ConTeXt may be difficult to
install outside the assistance of a port.  I wish recent, stable
versions of these could be included in a port, maybe the main port.

3) For now, the FreeBSD port for musixtex is incompatible with tetex.  I
wish that the various TeXLive components could be designed to be
compatible with each other so that a user could still choose to add
additional features after the initial installation.


These are only suggestions.  Thanks for your work maintaining TeX and
friends for FreeBSD.


---

Rick Voland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: www/horde-base

[Andrey Chernov]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:21:35AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > --- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php   Sat Sep 29 17:22:46
> > 2007 +++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php  Thu Dec 20
> > 10:38:46 2007 @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
> >  setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
> >  }
> >  }
> > +/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
> > +if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
> > +  setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
> > +}
> >  @putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
> >  @putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
> >  }
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nicki
> 
> The problem has been fixed, update your ports tree and rebuild.

You need to use __FreeBSD_version check in your patch, since the bug 
itself is fixed in 7x and up.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script

[Wesley Shields]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:44:59PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > I've took a stab at it[1].  If you have a FreeBSD box handy and can test
> > it out I'll be glad to receive feedback.  I've never used openresolv nor
> > do I have a use for it at the moment.  I'm not sure if my removal of the
> > symlink was the right thing to do or not since I'm not familiar with how
> > the software works.  Can you test out the port and let me know if it
> > works normally?
> 
> Which symlink did you remove?

ln -snf /var/run/resolvconf $(ETCDIR)/run, which appears to be the only
symlink installed by openresolv.

> /etc/resolv.conf should be a symlink to
> $PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf otherwise it won't actually work
> as resolvconf never updates the real /etc/resolv.conf

This is not something the Makefile does automatically, correct?  I can
add a message saying that the user must make the symlink manually to
enable openresolv?

> $PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run should be a symlink to /var/run/resolvconf so
> that all prior information collected is cleaned when the system boots.

OK, I'll put this back in - I'm not really sure about the policies on
installing things in /var/run though.  I know one of my other ports
touches /var so I guess it should be OK.

I've made the changes and updated the shar at the original location.  If
you can test it out and let me know if it works for you I would
appreciate it.  I've also added a message to be displayed during install
stating that the symlink of /etc/rc.conf needs to be applied manually,
and a message on deinstall stating that /var/run/resolvconf can be
removed if the port is no longer in use.

> > Also, if you want to be the maintainer I can change it to your address
> > if I send a PR for it.
> 
> No, not really. I spent enough time maintaining my software :)

Fair enough.  If you would like to see it in ports I can send in the PR
and maintain it, despite not using it.  I'll at least be more responsive
to problem reports than nobody.  :)

> On another note, what is the preferred means of getting something into
> ports? I also have dhcpcd [1] and a ports Makefile for it (dhcpcd is a
> DHCP client)

Documentation on submission is at:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html

> Thanks
> 
> Roy
> 
> PS - not currently subscribed to ports@ - should I be for this
> discussion?

You don't have to be.

> [1] http://dhcpcd.berlios.de/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: FreeBSD Ports Search webpage is not usable

[Kirill Ponomarew]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:04:07AM +0300, Кутейников Дмитрий wrote:
> Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
> package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
> time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
> package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what
> command I should enter to install openoffice.org-2.3.20071115 : `pkg_add -r
> openoffice.org`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg-23`, `pkg_add -r
> openofficeorg23`, `pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.3.20071115` or `pkg_add -r
> openoffice-org_23`. It's unbearable! Look at
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openoffice.org&searchon=names&suite=testing§ion=all
> It's simple. It gave me all information I need to know and I can type
> `apt-get install openoffice.org` or download precompiled package straight
> from the site.
> 
> FIX: Show real package names in the search results and give a link to
> precompiled package.

Well, you can always use "make package-name" to get the proper package
name, another side is, the specified name can be not available of ftp
server if the package wasn't uploaded from pointyhat.

-Kirill
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script

[Paul Schmehl]

--On Thursday, December 20, 2007 16:44:59 + Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:


On another note, what is the preferred means of getting something into
ports? I also have dhcpcd [1] and a ports Makefile for it (dhcpcd is a
DHCP client)



1) Create the port [1]
2) Submit it to the ports group [2]


Thanks

Roy

PS - not currently subscribed to ports@ - should I be for this
discussion?


You should if you're going to be a port maintainer.

[1] 
[2]  or man (1) send-pr

--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script

[Roy Marples]

> I've took a stab at it[1].  If you have a FreeBSD box handy and can test
> it out I'll be glad to receive feedback.  I've never used openresolv nor
> do I have a use for it at the moment.  I'm not sure if my removal of the
> symlink was the right thing to do or not since I'm not familiar with how
> the software works.  Can you test out the port and let me know if it
> works normally?

Which symlink did you remove?

/etc/resolv.conf should be a symlink to
$PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf otherwise it won't actually work
as resolvconf never updates the real /etc/resolv.conf

$PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run should be a symlink to /var/run/resolvconf so
that all prior information collected is cleaned when the system boots.

> Also, if you want to be the maintainer I can change it to your address
> if I send a PR for it.

No, not really. I spent enough time maintaining my software :)

On another note, what is the preferred means of getting something into
ports? I also have dhcpcd [1] and a ports Makefile for it (dhcpcd is a
DHCP client)

Thanks

Roy

PS - not currently subscribed to ports@ - should I be for this
discussion?

[1] http://dhcpcd.berlios.de/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script

[Wesley Shields]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:42:07AM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > Hi Eygene. You might get some ideas from this implementation then:
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/resolvconf
> > At least it contains those ugly sed expression to edit forwarders in a 
> > named.conf.
> 
> You may also want to look at openresolv, which is a resolvconf implementation
> that works on FreeBSD as well as Linux.
> http://roy.marples.name/node/343
> 
> I keep meaning to make a request to put that into ports :)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Roy

[ Moving off current@ and onto ports@ ]

I've took a stab at it[1].  If you have a FreeBSD box handy and can test
it out I'll be glad to receive feedback.  I've never used openresolv nor
do I have a use for it at the moment.  I'm not sure if my removal of the
symlink was the right thing to do or not since I'm not familiar with how
the software works.  Can you test out the port and let me know if it
works normally?

Also, if you want to be the maintainer I can change it to your address
if I send a PR for it.

-- WXS

[1]: http://www.atarininja.org/~wxs/patches/openresolv.shar - Just cd
/usr/ports/dns && sh /path/to/openresolv.shar
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: FreeBSD Ports Search webpage is not usable

[Pav Lucistnik]

Note that some packages might not be available for certain architectures
and FreeBSD versions, because the packages are always lagging few days
or a week behind the ports tree. Or the package can't be compiled.

We can't add it to the official website easily, because we don't have
that information available inside the website.

Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 17:59 +0300:
> `cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/` works properly but
> `pkg_add -r openoffice.org` doesn't work.
> And why don't you include these two lines of shell commands to
> official site interface?  
> 
> 2007/12/20, Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +0300:
> > Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I
> want to find
> > package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I
> don't have much 
> > time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site
> and in the
> > package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to
> guess, what
> > command I should enter to install
> openoffice.org-2.3.20071115 : `pkg_add -r
> > openoffice.org`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg-23`, `pkg_add -r
> > openofficeorg23`, `pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.3.20071115`
> or `pkg_add -r
> > openoffice-org_23`. It's unbearable! Look at 
> >
> 
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openoffice.org&searchon=names&suite=testing§ion=all
> > It's simple. It gave me all information I need to know and I
> can type
> > `apt-get install openoffice.org` or download precompiled
> package straight
> > from the site.
> >
> > FIX: Show real package names in the search results and give
> a link to 
> > precompiled package.
> 
> Maybe this would work for you? It even got the pkg_add command
> line:
> 
> http://www.freshports.org/editors/openoffice.org-2
> 
> --
> Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern
> gate, 
> saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee?
> 26 And the
> Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it
> down some
> where, forget my own head next. 27 And the Lord did not ask
> him again. 
> 
> 
-- 
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern gate,
   saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee?
26 And the Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it
   down some where, forget my own head next.
27 And the Lord did not ask him again.


signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně	 podepsaná část	 zprávy

Re: FreeBSD Ports Search webpage is not usable

[Кутейников Дмитрий]

`cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/` works properly but   `pkg_add -r
openoffice.org` doesn't work.
And why don't you include these two lines of shell commands to official site
interface?

2007/12/20, Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +0300:
> > Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
> > package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
>
> > time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
> > package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what
> > command I should enter to install openoffice.org-2.3.20071115 : `pkg_add
> -r
> > openoffice.org`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg-23`, `pkg_add -r
> > openofficeorg23`, `pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.3.20071115` or `pkg_add
> -r
> > openoffice-org_23`. It's unbearable! Look at
> > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openoffice.org&searchon=names&suite=testing§ion=all
>
> > It's simple. It gave me all information I need to know and I can type
> > `apt-get install openoffice.org` or download precompiled package
> straight
> > from the site.
> >
> > FIX: Show real package names in the search results and give a link to
> > precompiled package.
>
> Maybe this would work for you? It even got the pkg_add command line:
>
> http://www.freshports.org/editors/openoffice.org-2
>
> --
> Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern gate,
> saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee? 26 And the
> Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it down some
> where, forget my own head next. 27 And the Lord did not ask him again.
>
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

RE: FreeBSD Port: horde-base-3.1.5_1

[Barry Byrne]

> > Okay, so it's probably a Unicode vs. UTF-8 parser thing.
> >
> > My comment about the code needing to remain in ASCII stands, though
> > (this isn't your fault, of course).  The patch should really be
> > fixed to use literal whitespace (ASCII 0x20) or tabs (ASCII 0x09).
> >
> > I have commit access to fix this, but I want to clear it + discuss
> > with those involved with the PR first.
> 
> I have re-rolled the patch, please let me know if you still have 
> problems. It may take a while to get into the tree.
> 
> Beech

Looks fine now - ran portupgrade this morning and all is well.

Thanks,

Barry

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: www/horde-base

[Nicki de Wet]

- Original Message - 
From: "Jeremy Chadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Nicki de Wet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: www/horde-base




http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-December/045813.html



My apologies, I also saw the thread after posting. I've fixed it locally for 
now.


Regards,
Nicki 


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: www/horde-base

[Beech Rintoul]

On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Nicki de Wet said:
> The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when
> opening horde in the browser:
>
> Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in
> /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php on line 122
>
> This is the file that was patched.
>
> Here is the patch file's contents:
> --- lib/Horde/NLS.php.orig  2007-09-29 07:22:46.0 -0800
> +++ lib/Horde/NLS.php   2007-12-18 11:16:03.0 -0900
> @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
>  setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
>  }
>  }
> +/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
> +if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
> +  setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
> +}
>  @putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
>  @putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
>  }
>
> Here is what the file looks like now, obviously there were some
> funny characters: setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
> }
> }
>  \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
>  \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
>  \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
>  \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0}
> @putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
> @putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
> }
>
>
>
> This is what the patch should look like;
> --- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php   Sat Sep 29 17:22:46
> 2007 +++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php  Thu Dec 20
> 10:38:46 2007 @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
>  setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
>  }
>  }
> +/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
> +if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
> +  setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
> +}
>  @putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
>  @putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
>  }
>
> Regards,
> Nicki

The problem has been fixed, update your ports tree and rebuild.

Beech

-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | http://www.freebsd.org
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \  - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html
---



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: www/horde-base

[Jeremy Chadwick]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:40:02AM +0200, Nicki de Wet wrote:
> The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when opening horde 
> in the browser:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-December/045813.html

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

www/horde-base

[Nicki de Wet]

The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when opening horde 
in the browser:

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in 
/usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php on line 122

This is the file that was patched.

Here is the patch file's contents:
--- lib/Horde/NLS.php.orig  2007-09-29 07:22:46.0 -0800
+++ lib/Horde/NLS.php   2007-12-18 11:16:03.0 -0900
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
 setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
 }
 }
+/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
+  setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
+}
 @putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
 @putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
 }

Here is what the file looks like now, obviously there were some funny 
characters:
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}



This is what the patch should look like;
--- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php   Sat Sep 29 17:22:46 2007
+++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php  Thu Dec 20 10:38:46 2007
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
 setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
 }
 }
+/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
+  setlocale(LC_CTYPE,"C");
+}
 @putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
 @putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
 }

Regards,
Nicki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"