Re: force github file extension for fetch? (tar.bz2 instead of tar.gz)
On 6/3/19 3:33 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:46:32 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote: On 6/3/19 11:19 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 3. Jun 2019, at 19:03, Gary Aitken wrote: Is it possible to force fetching of .tar.bz2 instead of .tar.gz if both are available? Or how does one get around the problem? 11.2-RELEASE-p4 relevant Makefile details: PORTNAME= wxwidgets DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v DISTVERSION=3.1.2 USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= wxWidgets GH_PROJECT= wxWidgets See 5.4.5 in the porters handbook (EXTRACT_SUFX) Thanks; unfortunately it doesn't seem to work If I set EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.bz2 it still fetches .tar.gz If I set DISTFILES= wxWidgets-wxWidgets-v3.1.2_GH0.tar.bz2 it also still fetches .tar.gz If I manually fetch the file and set the above variables (separate attempts), make makesum will compute the checksum for both files (if both are present), but a make extract uses the .gz, not the .bz2 If I get rid of (rename) the .gz, it ignores the .bz2 and tries to fetch the .gz. Does EXTRACT_SUFX conflict with USE_GITHUB? Github support is using _GITHUB_EXTRACT_SUFX (see bsd.sites.mk line 450): _GITHUB_REV=0 _GITHUB_EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.gz So this can't be overridden on purpose. ah, thanks Are you sure you need a new wxWidgets port though? Won't x11-toolkits/wxgtk31 be sufficient (see also: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-wx.html ) thank you, I missed that, did not think to look in handbook and didn't recognize wxgtk as an alias for wxwidget. I think that should work. Gary ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: PR 236751 security/base-audit committer needed
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 2019/06/03 22:00: Hi! There is a new version of security/base-audit waiting for commit almost 2 months. Could somebody commit it, please? PR 236751 Done. Thank you for all your work on ports! Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: force github file extension for fetch? (tar.bz2 instead of tar.gz)
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:46:32 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote: > On 6/3/19 11:19 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > >> On 3. Jun 2019, at 19:03, Gary Aitken > >> wrote: > >> > >> In attempting to build a new port (prusa3d slicer) I need another > >> new port (wxWidgets). The original distfile fetch of wxWidgets > >> was a .tar.gz. The configure phase had an error; a search for the > >> source of the error turned up a bug (old) which claimed the error > >> was solved by fetching the distfile as a .tar.bz2. > >> .tar.bz2 is the github *nix distfile for the port. > >> > >> Is it possible to force fetching of .tar.bz2 instead of .tar.gz if > >> both are available? Or how does one get around the problem? > >> > >> 11.2-RELEASE-p4 > >> relevant Makefile details: > >> > >> PORTNAME= wxwidgets > >> DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v > >> DISTVERSION=3.1.2 > >> USE_GITHUB= yes > >> GH_ACCOUNT= wxWidgets > >> GH_PROJECT= wxWidgets > >> > > > > See 5.4.5 in the porters handbook (EXTRACT_SUFX) > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html > > > > Thanks; unfortunately it doesn't seem to work > If I set >EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.bz2 > it still fetches .tar.gz > If I set >DISTFILES= wxWidgets-wxWidgets-v3.1.2_GH0.tar.bz2 > it also still fetches .tar.gz > > If I manually fetch the file and set the above variables (separate > attempts), make makesum will compute the checksum for both files (if > both are present), but a make extract uses the .gz, not the .bz2 > If I get rid of (rename) the .gz, it ignores the .bz2 and tries to > fetch the .gz. > > Does EXTRACT_SUFX conflict with USE_GITHUB? > Github support is using _GITHUB_EXTRACT_SUFX (see bsd.sites.mk line 450): _GITHUB_REV=0 _GITHUB_EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.gz So this can't be overridden on purpose. Are you sure you need a new wxWidgets port though? Won't x11-toolkits/wxgtk31 be sufficient (see also: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-wx.html ) -m > Thanks, > Gary > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Michael Gmelin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: .build directory for cmake
On 6/3/19 2:07 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote: What if that changes to USES=cmake:insource ? If I do that I see no different behavior from USES=cmake, at least in terms of trying to reproduce the original problem (which was resolved by removing the work/.configure_done* file). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: .build directory for cmake (was: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 836, Issue 1)
Hello. What if that changes to USES=cmake:insource ? Regards. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: PR 236751 security/base-audit committer needed
Hi! > There is a new version of security/base-audit waiting for commit almost 2 > months. > Could somebody commit it, please? > > PR 236751 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372One year to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
PR 236751 security/base-audit committer needed
There is a new version of security/base-audit waiting for commit almost 2 months. Could somebody commit it, please? PR 236751 Kind regards Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: force github file extension for fetch? (tar.bz2 instead of tar.gz)
On 6/3/19 11:19 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 3. Jun 2019, at 19:03, Gary Aitken wrote: In attempting to build a new port (prusa3d slicer) I need another new port (wxWidgets). The original distfile fetch of wxWidgets was a .tar.gz. The configure phase had an error; a search for the source of the error turned up a bug (old) which claimed the error was solved by fetching the distfile as a .tar.bz2. .tar.bz2 is the github *nix distfile for the port. Is it possible to force fetching of .tar.bz2 instead of .tar.gz if both are available? Or how does one get around the problem? 11.2-RELEASE-p4 relevant Makefile details: PORTNAME= wxwidgets DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v DISTVERSION=3.1.2 USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= wxWidgets GH_PROJECT= wxWidgets See 5.4.5 in the porters handbook (EXTRACT_SUFX) https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html Thanks; unfortunately it doesn't seem to work If I set EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.bz2 it still fetches .tar.gz If I set DISTFILES= wxWidgets-wxWidgets-v3.1.2_GH0.tar.bz2 it also still fetches .tar.gz If I manually fetch the file and set the above variables (separate attempts), make makesum will compute the checksum for both files (if both are present), but a make extract uses the .gz, not the .bz2 If I get rid of (rename) the .gz, it ignores the .bz2 and tries to fetch the .gz. Does EXTRACT_SUFX conflict with USE_GITHUB? Thanks, Gary ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: licensing/restricted question about games/oneko-sakura
(Resend because I wasn't subscribed before) n...@n0.is transcribed 1.2K bytes: > Hi, > > I have recently picked up oneko-sakura and did some maintenance > work to make it build at least on NetBSD 8. So far I assumed it > was public-domain, going by reading the entries in the source > and the original URLs it points to, as well as Debian's license > document. > > svn commit 33748 of the Makefile states tt PATCHFILES, > which is defined as > PATCHFILES= oneko-1.2.sakura.3.diff.gz > > contains deriviative work. This was 18 years 7 months ago, > about the same time development stopped (1999 iirc). > > Debian considers the same source (3 patch revisions later, 1.2.sakura.5) > as: > https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/o/oneko/oneko_1.2.sakura.6-11_copyright > > > As the pkgsrc-wip maintainer I went by the element of least surprise > and copied the restrict and NO_CDROM for pkgsrc. > > My questions: why did you come to this conclusion, and > did someone who contributed to this check later revisions of > oneko-sakura (I think I based my work on sakura6, the last > public release)? > > I ask this as both a package maintainer as well as the maintainer of the > new oneko source as both public domain as well as bsd-2 don't go well > together with "no cdrom". > > > Cheers, > ng0 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
math/hs-Agda: Need help with defining LICENSE
Hello. I'm having troubles setting LICENSE properly for math/hs-Agda port. Its LICENSE file looks like this: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/Agda-2.6.0.1/src/LICENSE I've figured out that I surely need LICENSE_COMB= multi, but I'm unsure of the rest. I'd be grateful, if someone would write LICENSE block for me. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Please close bug 238192
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238192 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: force github file extension for fetch? (tar.bz2 instead of tar.gz)
> On 3. Jun 2019, at 19:03, Gary Aitken wrote: > > In attempting to build a new port (prusa3d slicer) I need another new > port (wxWidgets). The original distfile fetch of wxWidgets was a .tar.gz. > The configure phase had an error; a search for the source of the error > turned up a bug (old) which claimed the error was solved by fetching the > distfile as a .tar.bz2. > .tar.bz2 is the github *nix distfile for the port. > > Is it possible to force fetching of .tar.bz2 instead of .tar.gz if both are > available? Or how does one get around the problem? > > 11.2-RELEASE-p4 > relevant Makefile details: > > PORTNAME= wxwidgets > DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v > DISTVERSION=3.1.2 > USE_GITHUB= yes > GH_ACCOUNT= wxWidgets > GH_PROJECT= wxWidgets > See 5.4.5 in the porters handbook (EXTRACT_SUFX) https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html -m > Thanks, > > Gary > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
force github file extension for fetch? (tar.bz2 instead of tar.gz)
In attempting to build a new port (prusa3d slicer) I need another new port (wxWidgets). The original distfile fetch of wxWidgets was a .tar.gz. The configure phase had an error; a search for the source of the error turned up a bug (old) which claimed the error was solved by fetching the distfile as a .tar.bz2. .tar.bz2 is the github *nix distfile for the port. Is it possible to force fetching of .tar.bz2 instead of .tar.gz if both are available? Or how does one get around the problem? 11.2-RELEASE-p4 relevant Makefile details: PORTNAME= wxwidgets DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v DISTVERSION=3.1.2 USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= wxWidgets GH_PROJECT= wxWidgets Thanks, Gary ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: .build directory for cmake (was: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 836, Issue 1)
On 6/3/19 8:18 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote: On Monday, 3 June 2019 14:00:01 CEST freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: From: Gary Aitken I'm trying to port some linux code which uses cmake, and clearly don't know what I'm doing. I have USES= cmake set, but a make build terminates with: cd: /usr/ports/cad/prusa-slicer/work/.build: No such file or directory What am I missing? I presume the .build directory should be automatically created by the build process. Are you sure that the configure step is completing succesfully? You'd have to take a look in WRKDIR (e.g. try WRKDIR=/tmp/bare make configure ) to see what it's created exactly and where -- if anywhere -- the build-dir has ended up. I know I've run into this same problem with cmake-based ports, but I don't remember what I did to resolve it. Feel free to pop into #kde-freebsd on Freenode IRC to bounce ideas off the FreeBSD devel/cmake maintainers. Thank you, that was a big help. There was a .configure_done.prusa-slicer._usr_local but no .build subdirectory. If I remove the .configure_done and do a make configure it correctly creates the .build subdir and populates it, but due to an error it doesn't complete and so leaves no .configure_done. So... I can continue work from here, thanks. What's not clear is how the .configure_done got written in the first place; I can't reproduce it. Thanks, Gary ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Having trouble with firstboot-growfs
I've used Firstboot-growfs a few times and it usually goes without a snag. I touch /firstboot, reboot the box and when it comes back up it resizes the partition and resizes the filesystem. I've just spun up a FreeBSD 12 box, [vagrant@freebsd ~]$ freebsd-version 12.0-RELEASE-p5 I was able to resize the VMDK (by converting it to a VDI.. etc) 3. Name: ada0p3 Mediasize: 32212254720 (30G) type: freebsd-ufs index: 3 end: 65011837 start: 2097278 Consumers: 1. Name: ada0 Mediasize: 15728640 (146G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r2w2e5 but I can't seem to get past this point. Nothing shows up in /var/log/messages or in dmesg to indicate that there was a failure. Strangely enough on reboot, the triggerfile /firstboot is gone as if to indicate something was done. Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 836, Issue 1
On Monday, 3 June 2019 14:00:01 CEST freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: > From: Gary Aitken > > I'm trying to port some linux code which uses cmake, and clearly don't > know what I'm doing. > > I have >USES= cmake > set, but a >make build > terminates with: >cd: /usr/ports/cad/prusa-slicer/work/.build: No such file or directory > > What am I missing? I presume the .build directory should be automatically > created by the build process. Are you sure that the configure step is completing succesfully? You'd have to take a look in WRKDIR (e.g. try WRKDIR=/tmp/bare make configure ) to see what it's created exactly and where -- if anywhere -- the build-dir has ended up. I know I've run into this same problem with cmake-based ports, but I don't remember what I did to resolve it. Feel free to pop into #kde-freebsd on Freenode IRC to bounce ideas off the FreeBSD devel/cmake maintainers. [ade] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
