FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ lang/js_of_ocaml| 2.5 | 3.4.0 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by:portscout! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: poudriere and ports overlay support
On 2019-10-25 15:32, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >... As I understand it should be possible to have default ports tree synchronised by SVN or Git with official tree and the second tree with private ports only, called for example "myports" (/usr/myports) Then in make.conf define OVERLAYS= /usr/myports and the ports framework should lookup first at the /usr/myports then /usr/ports. If /usr/myports contains some changes in Mk/Uses files, they should be applied too. Thanks. I'll definitely look into it, as portshaker is slow. But it didn't work with poudriere. That would be a showstopper, though. bye & Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: poudriere and ports overlay support
Andrea Venturoli wrote on 2019/10/25 11:54: On 2019-10-25 11:35, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I would like to try Overlay support in ports tree (announced few weeks ago in 2019Q4 branch). The question is will it work with Poudriere or not? We are building all our packages with poudriere. I tried adding OVERLAYS= /vol0/poudriere/ports/myports in to myports-make.conf but "poudriere options -z myports -p default -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/pkglists/myports" failed when it reaches the / existing only in myports and not in default ports tree. Am I doing something wrong or Poudriere does not support Overlays? Sorry, I might have missed the original announcement. What is this Overlay support? I obviosly tried searching, but came up empty. Is that something which should achieve what ports-mgmt/portshaker (which I'm using) does? Yes, it should be something like portshaker but implemented directly in the ports tree Mk files. I didn't dig deep in it yet. Original announcement https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2019-October/117066.html and in ports/CHANGES 20190903: AUTHOR: b...@freebsd.org The ports tree now supports overlays overlays are a way to help users to integrate their own ports tree with the official ports tree without having to maintain clone of the official tree and remerge on regular basis. The ports tree will lookup in the overlays (in the order the are listed in OVERLAY variable) for the dependencies and the USES. It will use the first found. in order to use it the user have to declare his overlays that way in their make.conf: OVERLAYS= overlay1 overlay2 overlay3 As I understand it should be possible to have default ports tree synchronised by SVN or Git with official tree and the second tree with private ports only, called for example "myports" (/usr/myports) Then in make.conf define OVERLAYS= /usr/myports and the ports framework should lookup first at the /usr/myports then /usr/ports. If /usr/myports contains some changes in Mk/Uses files, they should be applied too. But it didn't work with poudriere. Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: poudriere and ports overlay support
On 2019-10-25 11:35, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I would like to try Overlay support in ports tree (announced few weeks ago in 2019Q4 branch). The question is will it work with Poudriere or not? We are building all our packages with poudriere. I tried adding OVERLAYS= /vol0/poudriere/ports/myports in to myports-make.conf but "poudriere options -z myports -p default -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/pkglists/myports" failed when it reaches the / existing only in myports and not in default ports tree. Am I doing something wrong or Poudriere does not support Overlays? Sorry, I might have missed the original announcement. What is this Overlay support? I obviosly tried searching, but came up empty. Is that something which should achieve what ports-mgmt/portshaker (which I'm using) does? bye & Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
poudriere and ports overlay support
I would like to try Overlay support in ports tree (announced few weeks ago in 2019Q4 branch). The question is will it work with Poudriere or not? We are building all our packages with poudriere. I tried adding OVERLAYS= /vol0/poudriere/ports/myports in to myports-make.conf but "poudriere options -z myports -p default -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/pkglists/myports" failed when it reaches the / existing only in myports and not in default ports tree. Am I doing something wrong or Poudriere does not support Overlays? Kind regards Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
