Re: sysutils/u-boot-rpi2 appears to be broken with freebsd/crochet from github
On Sunday, March 4, 2018, 1:07 AM (UTC+), "tech-lists" wrote: > When I use crochet to build for rpi2 it never completes writing the > image because it looks for things in /usr/local/share/u-boot/u-boot-rpi2 > and doesn't find for example LICENCE.broadcom. There's just two files > there: > > root@desktop:/usr/local/share/u-boot/u-boot-rpi2 # ls -lah > total 295 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 4B Mar 3 20:26 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 4B Mar 4 00:58 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 765B Mar 3 20:23 README > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 371K Mar 3 20:23 u-boot.bin > (My email client messed up and sent the reply only to -arm; so I'm sending this message again to -ports as well. Sorry for duplicate post.) I see that firmware files are separated from `sysutils/u-boot-rpi2` port and are now located in `sysutils/rpi-firmware` port as of [ports r454265](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=454265). Looks like Crochet requires some update. My wild guess is that RPi3 is yet to be separated because of gonzo's SMP binary (armstub8.bin)? -- Hyun Hwang ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
korean/man-doc: picking it up
Hi, I just noticed that tobik@ set the port [deprecated](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=482496). If it's okay I'll take the maintainership and try to revamp all the translation gradually. Thank you, -- Hyun Hwang ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: korean/man-doc: picking it up
On Saturday, October 20, 2018, 6:19 PM (UTC+0200), Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, at 18:14, Hyun Hwang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed that tobik@ set the port [deprecated] > > (https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=482496). If > > it's okay I'll take the maintainership and try to revamp all the > > translation gradually. > > > > Thank you, > > -- > > Hyun Hwang > > Sure, I just assigned the port to you. Thanks! > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/482588 Appreciated! -- Hyun Hwang ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Can two ports have master-slave relatioship across categories?
Hi, Source Han Sans is a font that supports 4 East Asian languages at the same time. Thus initially, I have split the font into four when porting; chinese/sourcehansans-{sc,tc}-otf, {japanese,korean}/sourcehansans-otf, respectively. These four have all their own Makefile, pkg-plist, distinfo, ..., which now I think are great redundancy. This is what master and slave ports are for, right? Question is: can these four have a master-slave relationship across their respective categories? I have schemed the Porter's Handbook, but it does not mention anything about redefining essential variables such as CATEGORIES, etc. Thank you, -- Hyun "Harold" Hwang ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Can two ports have master-slave relatioship across categories?
Cool! I'll start working on "enslaving" other three. Thanks! -- Hyun "Harold" Hwang On Sunday, April 14, 2019, 1:08 PM (UTC-04:00), Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:36 AM Hyun Hwang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Source Han Sans is a font that supports 4 East Asian languages at the same > > time. Thus initially, I have split the font into four when porting; > > chinese/sourcehansans-{sc,tc}-otf, {japanese,korean}/sourcehansans-otf, > > respectively. > > These four have all their own Makefile, pkg-plist, distinfo, ..., which now > > I think are great redundancy. This is what master and slave ports are for, > > right? > > > > Question is: can these four have a master-slave relationship across their > > respective categories? > > I have schemed the Porter's Handbook, but it does not mention anything > > about redefining essential variables such as CATEGORIES, etc. > > Hi Harold, > > Absolutely! There's essentially no limit to what can be redefined. > Just use CATEGORIES?= in the master. > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > ad...@adamw.org > https://www.adamw.org > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"