Re: sysutils/u-boot-rpi2 appears to be broken with freebsd/crochet from github

[Hyun Hwang]

On Sunday, March 4, 2018, 1:07 AM (UTC+), "tech-lists" 
 wrote:
> When I use crochet to build for rpi2 it never completes writing the
> image because it looks for things in /usr/local/share/u-boot/u-boot-rpi2
> and doesn't find for example LICENCE.broadcom. There's just two files
> there:
> 
> root@desktop:/usr/local/share/u-boot/u-boot-rpi2 # ls -lah
> total 295
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel 4B Mar  3 20:26 .
> drwxr-xr-x  4 root  wheel 4B Mar  4 00:58 ..
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   765B Mar  3 20:23 README
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   371K Mar  3 20:23 u-boot.bin
>

(My email client messed up and sent the reply only to -arm; so I'm sending this 
message again to -ports as well. Sorry for duplicate post.)

I see that firmware files are separated from `sysutils/u-boot-rpi2` port and 
are now located in `sysutils/rpi-firmware` port as of [ports 
r454265](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=454265). Looks 
like Crochet requires some update.

My wild guess is that RPi3 is yet to be separated because of gonzo's SMP binary 
(armstub8.bin)?
-- 
Hyun Hwang
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

korean/man-doc: picking it up

[Hyun Hwang]

Hi,

I just noticed that tobik@ set the port 
[deprecated](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=482496). 
If it's okay I'll take the maintainership and try to revamp all the translation 
gradually.

Thank you,
-- 
Hyun Hwang
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: korean/man-doc: picking it up

[Hyun Hwang]

On Saturday, October 20, 2018, 6:19 PM (UTC+0200), Tobias Kortkamp 
 wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, at 18:14, Hyun Hwang wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just noticed that tobik@ set the port [deprecated]
> > (https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=482496). If 
> > it's okay I'll take the maintainership and try to revamp all the 
> > translation gradually.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > -- 
> > Hyun Hwang
> 
> Sure, I just assigned the port to you. Thanks!
> 
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/482588

Appreciated!
-- 
Hyun Hwang
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Can two ports have master-slave relatioship across categories?

[Hyun Hwang]

Hi,

Source Han Sans is a font that supports 4 East Asian languages at the same 
time. Thus initially, I have split the font into four when porting; 
chinese/sourcehansans-{sc,tc}-otf, {japanese,korean}/sourcehansans-otf, 
respectively.
These four have all their own Makefile, pkg-plist, distinfo, ..., which now I 
think are great redundancy. This is what master and slave ports are for, right?

Question is: can these four have a master-slave relationship across their 
respective categories?
I have schemed the Porter's Handbook, but it does not mention anything about 
redefining essential variables such as CATEGORIES, etc.

Thank you,
--
Hyun "Harold" Hwang
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Can two ports have master-slave relatioship across categories?

[Hyun Hwang]

Cool! I'll start working on "enslaving" other three.

Thanks!
--
Hyun "Harold" Hwang


On Sunday, April 14, 2019, 1:08 PM (UTC-04:00), Adam Weinberger 
 wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:36 AM Hyun Hwang  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Source Han Sans is a font that supports 4 East Asian languages at the same 
> > time. Thus initially, I have split the font into four when porting; 
> > chinese/sourcehansans-{sc,tc}-otf, {japanese,korean}/sourcehansans-otf, 
> > respectively.
> > These four have all their own Makefile, pkg-plist, distinfo, ..., which now 
> > I think are great redundancy. This is what master and slave ports are for, 
> > right?
> >
> > Question is: can these four have a master-slave relationship across their 
> > respective categories?
> > I have schemed the Porter's Handbook, but it does not mention anything 
> > about redefining essential variables such as CATEGORIES, etc.
> 
> Hi Harold,
> 
> Absolutely! There's essentially no limit to what can be redefined.
> Just use CATEGORIES?= in the master.
> 
> # Adam
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adam Weinberger
> ad...@adamw.org
> https://www.adamw.org
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"