Re: CLANG 3.3/LLVM 3.3 question regarding devel/llvm vs. devel/llvm33

2013-07-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:32:36AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> 
> No is 9.1-STABLE en route also equipted with CLANG 3.3, as it is with
> CURRENT. The ports system still differs between the "standard"
> devel/llvm, which is in fact LLVM 3.2 and devel/llvm33, which is then
> LLVM 3.3.
> 
> devel/llvm installs some tools not in the standard manner, like
> llvm-config, which is then llvm-config33. This introduces some trouble
> and it seems a bit "out of sync".
> 
> Is there a chance that devel/llvm becomes llvm 3.3 in a short time? 

I'm in the process of moving to devel/llvm## + devel/llvm-devel and
removing devel/llvm.  As with the lang/gcc* ports all llvm and clang
programs will be installed with a ## suffix.  This rearrangement is a
low priority at work and I needed to set up some internal infrastructure
to make testing practical so I've not finished it up yet.

-- Brooks


pgpz851ML7ISf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


CLANG 3.3/LLVM 3.3 question regarding devel/llvm vs. devel/llvm33

2013-07-10 Thread O. Hartmann

No is 9.1-STABLE en route also equipted with CLANG 3.3, as it is with
CURRENT. The ports system still differs between the "standard"
devel/llvm, which is in fact LLVM 3.2 and devel/llvm33, which is then
LLVM 3.3.

devel/llvm installs some tools not in the standard manner, like
llvm-config, which is then llvm-config33. This introduces some trouble
and it seems a bit "out of sync".

Is there a chance that devel/llvm becomes llvm 3.3 in a short time? 

Regards,

Oliver


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature