Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED]
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Mario Lobo wrote: > > [...] > > It's compiling right now. > > > > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right > after > > the next reboot. > > So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious > if the new gcc version will really make a significant > difference. > I'm not as worried about performance as I am about compatibilty. Various software suites have started using newer GCCisms in their code. One example I can give from the top of my head is Wt (www.webtoolkit.eu), which compiles with 4.4, but not with 4.2. I shamefully haven't dug any deeper to check which particular syntactical construct offended 4.2. Yes, one might say, after all it's the upstream developers who ought to make sure their software compiles on FreeBSD, but some aditional overhead on the shoulders of our port maintainers should be expected. > Best regards > Oliver > > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. > Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: > secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- > chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart > > FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd > > "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, > because that would also stop you from doing clever things." > -- Doug Gwyn > ___ > freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Good, fast & cheap. Pick any two. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Using TSC without disabling ACPI
Hello list, I've been trying to use TSC without disabling ACPI and I failed. Is there a way I can achieve that? As long as ACPI was in use, the system always chose ACPI-fast. Thanks in advance. P.S. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Using TSC without disabling ACPI
On 3/22/07, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello list, I've been trying to use TSC without disabling ACPI > and I failed. Is there a way I can achieve that? As long as ACPI was > in use, the system always chose ACPI-fast. It varies a bit with the FreeBSD version, but did you try setting the kern.timecounter.hardware sysctl? Yes, sure. It is ignored unless I completely disable ACPI. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Is GNATS down?
I submitted a PR a few days ago and haven't heard anything related to the matter ever since. I was supposed to get a confirmation email once the PR had been filed. P.S. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to this list. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
32bit jails on 64bit hosts
Is there any knob in the .mk infrastructure that I can use to achieve $subj? Thanks in advance. P.S. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 32bit jails on 64bit hosts
On 11/30/06, Pieter de Goeje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:33, Vlad Galu wrote: > Is there any knob in the .mk infrastructure that I can use to > achieve $subj? Thanks in advance. build(7) suggests the use of TARGET_ARCH=i386. Thanks! - Pieter de Goeje -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"