RE: question on hosting and memory

2005-08-07 Thread Francisco

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:


You might want to consider LiteSpeed WebServer. They have a standard (free)


The specs for that seem very interesting.
What has been your experience with that program so far?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: question on hosting and memory

2005-08-04 Thread Sander Holthaus - Orange XL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2005, at 11:27 PM, David Banning wrote:
> 
>> I am running apache 1.3 with php and I find when that for each person
>> who visits the site, an additional 29 meg is consumed of my measly
>> 512M. Searching around, it seems like this is relatively normal.
>> 
>> So here is my question. How do big-time servers handle these type of
>> memory requirements? Presumably there are servers out there getting
>> thousands of visitors at once. Do they have 29 Meg * 1000 for every
>> thousand visitors? At what memory ceiling do they setup another
>> server machine to handle the load? Wouldn't it require a ton of
>> servers to handle a load of a thousand visitors?
>> 
> 
> It all depends on what the PHP is doing.  On one server I
> run, the hold up is not memory, but actually processing 200
> PHP scripts with db accesses at once, even with code
> acceleration products installed.
> 
> I have a dual athlon 2800+ system with 4GB of memory.  It can
> handle 200-240 httpd processes (apache2) with PHP5 running
> the postnuke system and phpbb2 (postnuke version).  The
> memory is only half used but the system load starts to go sky
> high when we start to get much over 200 httpd, depending on
> what mix of modules people are using, when enough processes
> need to run at once.  The CPU is not pegged, but the run queue gets
> too long. 
> 
> I am continuing to try and tune things and improve things,
> but so far this is about where we are at.  Before I put a
> code accelerator in (we have tested the commercial Zend one
> [and still are testing] but run with eaccelerator most of the
> time) we hit the wall much sooner.
> 
> (Note that the mysql DB is on another machine on the LAN).
> 
> Chad
> 
>> I am nowhere in this league, but the question comes to mind because
>> it seems crazy that 20 visitors to my site can clog things up, simply
>> because I choose to run apache and php.
>> 
>> I have been looking at lighttpd decrease memory usage, but I require
>> url rewriting and I find the documentation for lighttpd is lacking
>> is this area. 
>> 
>> Any comments or suggestions are welcome -

You might want to consider LiteSpeed WebServer. They have a standard (free)
version and a pro (paid) version that should perform much better than Apache
and PHP. It should even perform better as Lighttpd and has the same
rewriting-syntax as Apache. (In fact, it closely resembles Apache in terms
of configuration).

Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: question on hosting and memory

2005-08-03 Thread Wil Hatfield
David,

First no host should be running anything less than dual 2.x Xeons and 1GB of
RAM. Thats a minimum. Add a large swap of about 4GB.  Then tailor your 1.3
so it only compiles with the components necessary. Basic core, PHP,
Frontpage, Python as DSO whenever possible. And your PHP should only be
compiled with what you actually expect to use. Our httpd's are using about
10MB each with PHP loaded. Then fine tune your httpd.conf timeouts so that
those idle processes don't stick around too long.

Then tune your kernel settings a bit. I use these in sysctl.conf and came
about them through trial and error mostly. Of course this means that
somebody on the list here may disagree with them but they work well and help
keep the processes in line.

kern.ipc.somaxconn=1024
kern.maxfiles=2
kern.maxproc=12328
kern.maxprocperuid=11084
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=32768

Of course you will need to fine tune other full time applications on the
machine to use as little resources as possible themselves. This includes
your SMTP server, Pop3 server, etc. The more you can fine tune the faster
the machine can do its business and move on to the next task.


Hope it helps,

Wil Hatfield
HyperConX




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Banning
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question on hosting and memory


I am running apache 1.3 with php and I find when that for each person
who visits the site, an additional 29 meg is consumed of my measly 512M.
Searching around, it seems like this is relatively normal.

So here is my question. How do big-time servers handle these type of
memory requirements? Presumably there are servers out there getting
thousands of visitors at once. Do they have 29 Meg * 1000 for every
thousand visitors? At what memory ceiling do they setup another server
machine to handle the load? Wouldn't it require a ton of servers to handle
a load of a thousand visitors?

I am nowhere in this league, but the question comes to mind because it
seems crazy that 20 visitors to my site can clog things up, simply because
I choose to run apache and php.

I have been looking at lighttpd decrease memory usage, but I require
url rewriting and I find the documentation for lighttpd is lacking
is this area.

Any comments or suggestions are welcome -

--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: question on hosting and memory

2005-08-03 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


On Aug 3, 2005, at 11:27 PM, David Banning wrote:


I am running apache 1.3 with php and I find when that for each person
who visits the site, an additional 29 meg is consumed of my measly  
512M.

Searching around, it seems like this is relatively normal.

So here is my question. How do big-time servers handle these type of
memory requirements? Presumably there are servers out there getting
thousands of visitors at once. Do they have 29 Meg * 1000 for every
thousand visitors? At what memory ceiling do they setup another server
machine to handle the load? Wouldn't it require a ton of servers to  
handle

a load of a thousand visitors?



It all depends on what the PHP is doing.  On one server I run, the  
hold up is not memory, but actually processing 200 PHP scripts with  
db accesses at once, even with code acceleration products installed.


I have a dual athlon 2800+ system with 4GB of memory.  It can handle  
200-240 httpd processes (apache2) with PHP5 running the postnuke  
system and phpbb2 (postnuke version).  The memory is only half used  
but the system load starts to go sky high when we start to get much  
over 200 httpd, depending on what mix of modules people are using,  
when enough processes need to run at once.  The CPU is not pegged,  
but the run queue gets too long.


I am continuing to try and tune things and improve things, but so far  
this is about where we are at.  Before I put a code accelerator in  
(we have tested the commercial Zend one [and still are testing] but  
run with eaccelerator most of the time) we hit the wall much sooner.


(Note that the mysql DB is on another machine on the LAN).

Chad


I am nowhere in this league, but the question comes to mind because it
seems crazy that 20 visitors to my site can clog things up, simply  
because

I choose to run apache and php.

I have been looking at lighttpd decrease memory usage, but I require
url rewriting and I find the documentation for lighttpd is lacking
is this area.

Any comments or suggestions are welcome -

--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"




---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


question on hosting and memory

2005-08-03 Thread David Banning
I am running apache 1.3 with php and I find when that for each person 
who visits the site, an additional 29 meg is consumed of my measly 512M.
Searching around, it seems like this is relatively normal.

So here is my question. How do big-time servers handle these type of 
memory requirements? Presumably there are servers out there getting
thousands of visitors at once. Do they have 29 Meg * 1000 for every
thousand visitors? At what memory ceiling do they setup another server
machine to handle the load? Wouldn't it require a ton of servers to handle
a load of a thousand visitors?

I am nowhere in this league, but the question comes to mind because it 
seems crazy that 20 visitors to my site can clog things up, simply because
I choose to run apache and php.

I have been looking at lighttpd decrease memory usage, but I require
url rewriting and I find the documentation for lighttpd is lacking
is this area.

Any comments or suggestions are welcome -

-- 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"