Re: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote: > Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are > available? > > https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not > repostquestions from its > subscribers and other information that is not related to updates. Mailing list freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Freebsddiary.org - Integrated marketing help
face="Verdana, sans-serif">Freebsddiary.org color="#ff">Team, I thought you might like to know some reasons why you are not getting enough Social Media and Organic search engine traffic forFreebsddiary.org 1. Your website Freebsddiary.org is not ranking top in Google organic searches for many competitive keyword phrases. 2. Your company is not doing well in most of the Social Media Websites. 3. Your site is not user friendly on mobile devices. There are many additional improvements that could be made to your website, and if you would like to learn about them, and are curious to know what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to provide you with a detailed analysis in the form of a WEBSITE AUDIT REPORT for FREE. Our clients consistently tell us that their customers find them because they are at the top of the Google search rankings. Being at the top left of Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can do for your company's website traffic and online reputation. You will be happy to know that, my team is willing to guarantee you 1st page Google ranking for most of your targeted keyword phrases in our six month ongoing campaign. Sound interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you. I am also available to meet you in person and present you this website audit report.-Best Regards,Joseph Taylorface="Verdana, sans-serif">Marketing Consultantcolor="#ff">href="tel:%28315%29-895-1453" target="_blank">(href="tel:315%29-895-1453" value="+13158951453" target="_blank">315)-895-1453color="#ff"> PS I: I am not spamming. I have studied your website and believe I can help with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not contact again. PS II: I found your site using Google search and after having a look over your website I recommend you to implement future technologies such as HTML5 and Responsive Design to make your site more accessible in mobile phone, tablets, desktop etc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib?
--On 20 August 2013 18:02 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you have (or can you enable) ssh running in the jail? If so, log into the jail that way, and see what sysctl net.my_fibnum shows then, because you'll be running under the environment created by /etc/rc. Ok, one word: Bingo. That was it. I'll spare you the gory details of how I cut myself off from the machine, managed to create a jail with no access etc. etc. But yes, that was it - in summary: jail -c -v Does not actually *show* the fib being set, but will show an error if the setfib call fails. jexec Runs a process in the jail, using the prevailing fib - not the jails fib, you can rectify this by using 'setfib X jexec jail tcsh' I don't know if that last point should be considered a 'bug' or not... Many thanks for your help! -Karl ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases
On 21/08/2013 08:10, dgmm wrote: > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote: >> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are >> available? >> >> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not >> repostquestions from its >> subscribers and other information that is not related to updates. > > Mailing list > freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org Don't forget about securing your ports too. There's several available mechanisms: RSS feed from vuxml.freebsd.org portaudit(1) -- for old style packages pkg audit -- for pkgng-ized systems Cheers, Matthew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib?
On 21/08/2013 11:35, Karl Pielorz wrote: --On 20 August 2013 18:02 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you have (or can you enable) ssh running in the jail? If so, log into the jail that way, and see what sysctl net.my_fibnum shows then, because you'll be running under the environment created by /etc/rc. Ok, one word: Bingo. That was it. I'll spare you the gory details of how I cut myself off from the machine, managed to create a jail with no access etc. etc. But yes, that was it - in summary: jail -c -v Does not actually *show* the fib being set, but will show an error if the setfib call fails. jexec Runs a process in the jail, using the prevailing fib - not the jails fib, you can rectify this by using 'setfib X jexec jail tcsh' I don't know if that last point should be considered a 'bug' or not... Certainly the jexec problem is going to bite people again and again, so you should probably file a PR for it. As for the -v option, the man page says "Print a message on every operation", so it's down to what is or isn't regarded as an operation worth reporting. Many thanks for your help! No problem, it helps me understand jails better as well. -- In the dungeons of Mordor, Sauron bred Orcs with LOLcats to create a new race of servants. Called Uruk-Oh-Hai in the Black Speech, they were cruel and delighted in torturing spelling and grammar. _Lord of the Rings 2.0, the Web Edition_ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Renumber users and groups
Hello, On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and all users come with GID lower that 100. I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20 years old! This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few FreeBSD services that have a conflicting ID. But now I want to share the user directories with Mac (10.6). On Mac, any id lower than 512 should be reserved for the system. I tried to renumber the conflicting services on Mac OS, but it messes up the system. So I should renumber my users; it's not very difficult to do, but I have over 1TB of user files for 200 users. Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? What pitfall should I avoid? Best regards, Olivier -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Renumber users and groups
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 7:36, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? > Maybe! I haven't tried this myself yet, but next time I need to do this I think I'm going to take an mtree backup of the entire filesystem, change the UIDs and GIDs (vipw, then vi /etc/groups), and then re-apply the mtree to the entire filesystem. It should find all the files that are now orphaned and fix them to use the new UID/GID that you specified. :) > What pitfall should I avoid? > Not having a backup :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Renumber users and groups
On 21/08/2013 13:36, Olivier Nicole wrote: Hello, On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and all users come with GID lower that 100. I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20 years old! This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few FreeBSD services that have a conflicting ID. But now I want to share the user directories with Mac (10.6). On Mac, any id lower than 512 should be reserved for the system. I tried to renumber the conflicting services on Mac OS, but it messes up the system. So I should renumber my users; it's not very difficult to do, but I have over 1TB of user files for 200 users. Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? What pitfall should I avoid? Best regards, Olivier Both tar and rsync are spectacularly clever about this. I've never needed to renumber users, but I've noticed tar will restore a backup across hosts and try to resolve user names correctly. tar stores users and groups symbolically and will happily extract them to the correct numerical ID on the new host. All you need do, therefore, is merge the passwd and group files without conflict and "untar" everything. If you've got to do this in-place it's not going to work, but as you'd be wise to make a backup anyway you may as well make a copy instead, and let it convert them on the fly. rsync seems to pull the same trick. Regards, Frank. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Renumber users and groups
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:12, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > On 21/08/2013 13:36, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and > > all users come with GID lower that 100. > > > > I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20 > > years old! > > > > This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few > > FreeBSD services that have a conflicting ID. > > > > But now I want to share the user directories with Mac (10.6). On Mac, > > any id lower than 512 should be reserved for the system. > > > > I tried to renumber the conflicting services on Mac OS, but it messes up > > the system. > > > > So I should renumber my users; it's not very difficult to do, but I have > > over 1TB of user files for 200 users. > > > > Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? > > > > What pitfall should I avoid? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Olivier > > Both tar and rsync are spectacularly clever about this. I've never > needed to renumber users, but I've noticed tar will restore a backup > across hosts and try to resolve user names correctly. tar stores users > and groups symbolically and will happily extract them to the correct > numerical ID on the new host. All you need do, therefore, is merge the > passwd and group files without conflict and "untar" everything. If > you've got to do this in-place it's not going to work, but as you'd be > wise to make a backup anyway you may as well make a copy instead, and > let it convert them on the fly. rsync seems to pull the same trick. > Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just confirming permissions and ownership on all files. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Renumber users and groups
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:36, Mark Felder wrote: > > Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the > same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just > confirming permissions and ownership on all files. > I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree with and without nscd. I bet nscd could speed it up a lot. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UUID in fstab.
Thanks for the support. I want to use the uuid's found using sysctl -a in fstab. /dev/gptid/ has only uuid for boot partition. Cheers Sainath On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > /dev/gptid/$UID > > maybe what you are looking for? > > Warner > > On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:16 AM, varanasi sainath wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > How to find UUID's for Disk volumes. > > > > I have used sysctl -a | grep uuid and was able to find > > freebsd-swap > > b55ff220-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c > > > > freebsd-ufs > > b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c > > > > are these the corresponding UUID's for swap and ufs. > > > > I din't find /dev/ufsid folder to get the UUID's > > > > I have used glabel and was able to create labels, system boots well, > > everything works fine but I don't want to use labels (operating > constraint: > > to create labels I have to boot into single user mode, is there a way to > > create labels on mounted partitions (I hope not)). > > > > I found gptid folder which has boot UUID can this be used? > > > > How to use UUID's in fstab? > > > > I have tried using > > # DeviceMountpointFStype Options Dump > > Pass# > > uuid=b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c / ufs rw 1 1 > > > > that din't work. > > > > I found (from a post) /dev/ufsid/ should be used in fstab but I > don't > > see ufsid in /dev. Do we need to create this or does the system does it? > > > > Note: > > Using FreeBSD 9.1. created partitions using the guided partition tool. > > > > Reason: using a SCSI storage driver which changes the drive name > > accordingly but freebsd installer (boot) is unable to find the drives > which > > results in boot failure. > > > > Thanks, > > Sainath.* > > * > > * > > * > > *"Learning is the key to excellence".* > > ___ > > freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-drivers > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-drivers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > -- Sainath Varanasi Hyderabad 09000855250 *My Website : http://s21embedded.webs.com **Linked In Profile : http://in.linkedin.com/pub/sainathvaranasi .. .. * ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
I just update snort (using portmaster -PP snort) and now I'm getting this: # pkg_info | grep ^snort pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring snort-2.9.3.1 Lightweight network intrusion detection system # any ideas how to address it? thanks in advance! -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Invitation: Hello dear @ Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:30pm - 8:30pm (hellentolbe...@gmail.com)
You have been invited to the following event. Title: Hello dear Hello, My name is Miss Hellen Tolbert, It give me a great pleasure to write you. I was browsing when i came across your email and I was attracted to write to you so that we can be friends if you will have the desire as me. i will be very happy to be in communication with you so that we can get to know each other better and see what happens in future. I will like you to reply to my email (hellentolb...@ymail.com) so that i can tell you more about my self and give you my pictures. I will be waiting to hear from you. Have a blessed day. Thanks Miss Hellen Tolbert. When: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:30pm – 8:30pm Eastern Time Calendar: hellentolbe...@gmail.com Who: (Guest list is too large to display) Event details: https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=amxlcGd0YW4wdmgwZHF0b25mcDZ2czZvNG8gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc&tok=MjQjaGVsbGVudG9sYmVydDJAZ21haWwuY29tMDc4ZjExODAxMTFiZWY2MGQ3Njg2NmNmMzk0YTFmNzQ2NDkyMDU5NA&ctz=America/New_York&hl=en Invitation from Google Calendar: https://www.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this courtesy email at the account freebsd-questions@freebsd.org because you are an attendee of this event. To stop receiving future notifications for this event, decline this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for your entire calendar. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 9.2
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1619404 It is helpful too… On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote: > >> >> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is >> it supported? >> >> I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for NetBSD >> (jibbed) and I will see how is works but I like to install FreeBSD (not >> double boot, just FreeBSD). >> > > See: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28915479-B712-4ED0-A041-B75F2F59FECA > > Thats not a complete answer as I don't use any of the user interface stuff. > However, it will give a starting point for you. I have updated my two newest > minis to run 9.2 (latest candidate). > > Mitja http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
dig
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: dig freebsd.org +trace Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful information. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dig
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote: There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: dig freebsd.org +trace Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful information. ___ Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) Is there something wrong with your local bind configuration? Regards, Frank. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dig
On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > >> On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I >>> believe its also in 9.1. The command: >>> >>> dig freebsd.org +trace >>> >>> Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running >>> the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful >>> information. >>> ___ >>> >> >> Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) >> >> Is there something wrong with your local bind configuration? >> >> Regards, Frank. > > No. The 7.2 config is identical to the 9.1 and there is no bind running on > the 9.2. > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dig
> > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in > > 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: > > > > dig freebsd.org +trace > > > > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is > provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a > complete trace with lots of useful information. > > Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) And on: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r248938: Sun Mar 31 06:24:42 EDT 2013 amd64 Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dig
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: dig freebsd.org +trace Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful information. Have you tested against another NS? I ran into a similar problem when setting up unbound as a local recursor recently on a 9.1-STABLE (r251985) box. dig +trace would return (next to) nothing. dig +trace @8.8.8.8 worked as expected. I found it was the access-control configuration of unbound. Changing my "access-control: ::1 allow" to "access-control: ::1 allow_snoop" restored the +trace functionality. I'm not sure how this translates with bind.. Perhaps the defaults have changed between the versions that you're running (if you're running the base versions on 7.2 and 9.1) or your recursive server isn't allowing it on 9.2? Fwiw, in unbound, "allow" allows recursive lookups, "allow_snoop" allows both recursive and non-recursive lookups. - Col ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Renumber users and groups
Thank you, >> Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the >> same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just >> confirming permissions and ownership on all files. > I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree with > and without nscd. I bet nscd could speed it up a lot. I did try mtree on my own files, counting for 20% of the total size, and it took only seconds. I bet other users may have many more smaller files, but it's all a matter of minutes, so it is fast enough. Best regards, Olivier ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello freebsdquestions
Hello freebsdquestions i havent seen anything work as well as this on the first try http://bitly.com/13C7n5L quit your nine to five in three weeks or less guaranteed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
