Re: Odd IDE / vinum problem on new 4.9-RC3 system

2003-10-20 Thread Rob Lahaye

Serious Signal wrote:
Well colleagues, but both of you failed to specify your onboard IDE
controlled
dmesg lines! ;-)

*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
 
 
 Dmitry,
 
 Good catch!
 
 atapci0: VIA 82C686 ATA100 controller port 0xe000-0xe00f at device 7.1 on pci0
 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
 
 In my case, the motherboard came in a Shuttle XPC (Flex ATX form factor)
 barebones model FV24 which uses the VIA VT82C686B chipset.  It has the
 latest available BIOS installed.
 

And my case again:
atapci0: VIA 82C596 ATA66 controller port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
[...]
ata1-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded
ad0: 76319MB ST380021A [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
acd0: CDROM GCR-8521B at ata1-master PIO4
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 181887 of 90912-91039 (ad0s1 bn 181887; cn 11 tn 
82 sn 6) retrying
ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 181887 of 90912-91039 (ad0s1 bn 181887; cn 11 tn 
82 sn 6) retrying
ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 181887 of 90912-91039 (ad0s1 bn 181887; cn 11 tn 
82 sn 6) retrying
ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 181887 of 90912-91039 (ad0s1 bn 181887; cn 11 tn 
82 sn 6) falling back to PIO mode

Motherboard is most probably ASUS, P2B or of that family.

Regards,
Rob.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.9-PRE - if_xe.ko failed to register

2003-10-20 Thread Kevin Oberman
 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:25:09 -0400
 From: Zeno Sirbu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi,
 
 Maybe this message should go to mobile.
 
 Machine: IBM ThinkPad 600 (Model 2645-85U) PII-300, 64 RAM, 4GB HDD
 Network card: Xircom CE3B-100BTX (pcmcia)
 
 I've SUP yesterday (Sept 30) from cvsup12.freebsd.org , make world, mergemaster,
 MAKEDEV, updated /stand , rebooted, everyting seems to be ok but I'm getting an
 error related to the pcmcia network card.
 
 uname -a :
 FreeBSD thinkpad600.sprintnet.ca 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Tue
 Sep 30 23:25:10 EDT 2003
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
 
 (from dmesg) :
 pccard: card inserted, slot 0
 xe0 at port 0x240-0x24f iomem 0xd1000-0xd1fff irq 3 slot 0 on pccard0
 xe0: Xircom CE3, bonding version 0x45, 100Mbps capable
 xe0: DingoID = 0, RevisionID = 0, VendorID = 0
 xe0: Ethernet address 00:80:c7:ea:2c:c6
 
 xe0: watchdog timeout; resetting card
 
 After reset the card starts to function normally (gets an IP from DHCP 
 server, etc.). Can somebody help? What I'm doing wrong ?

This is absolutely normal. (Not ideal, but normal.) The two messages
about the module load failure simply indicate that the xe driver is
already present...eith built into the kernel or already loaded when
the card is probed. Ideally the pccardd should check whether the
driver is already present and not try to load it, but it's not quite
that simple as the driver module may be loaded at boot time (via
loader.conf) or built into the kernel.

The watchdog timeout is also normal. The author of the xe driver
recently patched the driver in CURRENT to try to eliminate this
initialization problem, but I have not tried my card recently, so I
don't know if the issue is fully resolved. In any case, the only
effect of this is a 5 second delay when the card starts.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Phone: +1 510 486-8634
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Expert input required: P4 odd signals, no apparent memory fault, DISABLE_PSE?

2003-10-20 Thread Jan Grant
I'm tracking -STABLE on a 1.8GHz P4 with 512MB of memory. Roughly since
the PAE changes were MFCed, I've been seeing memory-corruption-related
errors under specific circumstances: for example, a run of
portsdb -fUu
can be guaranteed to generate SIGBUS, SIGILL and SIGSEGVs in a handful
of sh, sed, etc. processes.

However, reverting to a 4.8 kernel from prior to September either
hides/masks these errors, or no longer triggers them. The memory/mobo
_appears_ to check out OK under (ferinstance) extended runs of
memtest86.

Now, on -current I've seen reference to the DISABLE_PSE kernel option,
and some discussion that this behaviour may be due to a processor/timing
bug. So I have the following questions which I'd appreciate an expert
giving a definitive opinion on (I'm no x86/hardware hacker, me):

- are these problems potentially caused by this bug?
- what exactly does DISABLE_PSE do? (it's undocumented and a one-para
  explanation of the expected behaviour of this option would be
  appreciated)
- were any commits around the time of the MFC of the PAE code liable to
  have introduced problems into the kernel which this workaround might
  address?

I know it's a lot to ask, but both hardware and OS have been rock-solid
up until this point. Although I've not conclusively ruled out hardware
faults, the continued stability under high load of a pre-september 4.8
kernel makes me suspicious that this is more likely to be a bug getting
tickled than I'd normally suspect from these symptoms.

I'm about to experiment with this option but it currently feels a little
like cargo-cult admin. If there are any definitive tests that would
indicate if this hardware problem is present and addressed by this,
that's be nice to know too.

Cheers,
jan

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
No generalised law is without exception. A self-demonstrating axiom.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Expert input required: P4 odd signals, no apparent memory fault, DISABLE_PSE?

2003-10-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
How recent is your copy of RELENG_4 ?  The PSE disable code was committed 
to the tree already as well as a fix so it would work with APM on the 
17th.  By default it is disabled.  If you look at your dmesg.boot you 
should see
Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled

---Mike

At 11:38 AM 20/10/2003, Jan Grant wrote:
I'm tracking -STABLE on a 1.8GHz P4 with 512MB of memory. Roughly since
the PAE changes were MFCed, I've been seeing memory-corruption-related
errors under specific circumstances: for example, a run of
portsdb -fUu
can be guaranteed to generate SIGBUS, SIGILL and SIGSEGVs in a handful
of sh, sed, etc. processes.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Expert input required: P4 odd signals, no apparent memoryfault, DISABLE_PSE?

2003-10-20 Thread Jan Grant
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:

 How recent is your copy of RELENG_4 ?  The PSE disable code was committed
 to the tree already as well as a fix so it would work with APM on the
 17th.  By default it is disabled.  If you look at your dmesg.boot you
 should see
 Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled

Latest was pre-weekend; I'm just completing a fresh build now, so I hope
this'll lick the problem, thanks. (Incidentally this might well be worth
documenting in UPDATING since it's an issue that's been plaguing me [and
a few correspondents, according to emails I've had] for a while.)

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Prolog in JavaScript: http://ioctl.org/logic/prolog-latest
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SIS 651 chip set, ata problem

2003-10-20 Thread Peter Spekreijse
Hi!

We're trying to install FreeBSD 4.9/RC on a system with a
Asus P4S533-MX board (SIS 651 chipset). This does not work
with UDMA enabled. Is this problem known? Is there a work-around?

Greetings,

Peter.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Solved. Re: Expert input required: P4 odd signals, no apparent memoryfault, DISABLE_PSE?

2003-10-20 Thread Jan Grant
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Jan Grant wrote:

 On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:

  How recent is your copy of RELENG_4 ?  The PSE disable code was committed
  to the tree already as well as a fix so it would work with APM on the
  17th.  By default it is disabled.  If you look at your dmesg.boot you
  should see
  Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled

 Latest was pre-weekend; I'm just completing a fresh build now, so I hope
 this'll lick the problem, thanks. (Incidentally this might well be worth
 documenting in UPDATING since it's an issue that's been plaguing me [and
 a few correspondents, according to emails I've had] for a while.)

Well, I'm pleased to report what looks like success: as Mike indicated,
PSE is now disabled automatically by default. I've tried repeating the
activities which have recently been triggering memory corruption - so
far with no ill effects. I'll keep the stress tests running overnight.


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
I think therefore I am. -- Ronnie Descartes
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SIS 651 chip set, ata problem

2003-10-20 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:29:50 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Spekreijse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi!
 
 We're trying to install FreeBSD 4.9/RC on a system with a
 Asus P4S533-MX board (SIS 651 chipset). This does not work
 with UDMA enabled. Is this problem known? Is there a work-around?

Yes, this problem is known (PR-43345). Unfortunately, it is not very
easily fixed under 4-stable (I believe -current already has a fix for
this) according to the people who are experts on the ATA code.

Workaround, here is my experience:
http://geekinfo.net/article.php?story=20021229152603904

Basically, if your BIOS allows you to turn off ultra-dma, you will get
FreeBSD installed. The patch described in PR-43345 works for me, but
YMMV, because I use a 20G ATA66 hard drive.

Hope this helps a bit.
-- 
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


hpt374 + freebsd 4.8 (epox mainboard)

2003-10-20 Thread Lukasz Kowalczyk

 i have that on boot:
 
 ata0: reseting device ...done
 acd0: MODE_SENSE_BIG command timeout - reseting

 and next time , next time , and next time .. :
 
 hardware/software configuration:
 freebsd 4.8
 epox mainboard 4pca3+ (intel 875p)
 hpt374
 two maxtor hard disks (raid 1)
 
 when i turn off hpt374 (in bios), the situation is the same.
 
 any help ideas?


 regards.
-- 
   __   ___ ___ _
[Lukasz Kowalczyk][neos(at)of.pl] / _ \| __| _ \ |
[main(){while(1){fork();}}]  | (_) | _||  _/ |__
[Security Officer/Administrator]  \___/|_(_)_| ||


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kern/53717: 4.8-RELEASE kernel panic (page fault)

2003-10-20 Thread Keith Lee
Anyone knows howt to solve this prob?

Keith.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]