named coredumping

2005-06-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
  Dear colleagues,

today I've got problem with named exiting on signal 11. Yes, I've searched
archives and found that POKED TIMER is a problem in our threads.

Has anyone faced this problem and workarounded it? Or may be even fixed it?
Is there anywhere detailed description of the problem?

Jun 19 06:00:58 daemon.warn ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER ***
Jun 19 06:28:40 daemon.warn ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER ***
Jun 19 06:49:54 daemon.warn ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER ***
Jun 19 07:18:19 daemon.warn ns named[44534]: *** POKED TIMER ***
Jun 19 07:18:38 kern.info ns kernel: pid 44534 (named), uid 53: exited on 
signal 11

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Routes not deleted after link down

2005-06-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
J Second, you may need a route daemon for this.  ospf is a well known 
J canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.

While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its
neighbors, the kernel will still have the route installed and thus
the box won't be able to contact other hosts on the connected net,
while they are reachable via alternate pass.

I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when interface
link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet.

From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a correct
behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop.

My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.

What is opinion of other networkers?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Routes not deleted after link down

2005-06-19 Thread Michal Vanco
On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
 J Second, you may need a route daemon for this.  ospf is a well known
 J canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.

 While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its
 neighbors, the kernel will still have the route installed and thus
 the box won't be able to contact other hosts on the connected net,
 while they are reachable via alternate pass.

Routing protocol should be responsible for removing affected routes from FIB. 
For example quagga should remove all routes learned via particular ospf 
neighbour when that neighbour is not reachable anymore due to link goes down. 
But in case when no daemons are used (`static' and `connected' are also 
`routing protocols'), kernel should be responsible for doing that.

 I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when interface
 link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet.

Junipers do the same. It is the only feasible behaviour for router.


 From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a correct
 behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop.


Sure.

 My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
 switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.


Agree.


pgp8nMK3Ubf8W.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: re0 no carrier problem - Patches found in archives didn't work.

2005-06-19 Thread Marcin Koziej


[04:12 19-06-2005] Tom Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 this may seem obvious, but do you still have the same issue if you  
 statically define the mediatype to a fixed link speed and duplex?   
 lots of interfaces have problems negotiating autoselect with  
 switches, as protocols vary widely.  the blinking is indicative of  
 autoselect setup woes...

This wasn't obvious for me! Thanks for the answer!

When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could be 
transmitted 
(yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled the switch with my 
home 
lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - It worked! 

So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, that with 
media 
set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works fine with this 
switch 
(i have used it all day yesterday till evening without problem). Now, when i 
wait 
some time with media manually set, it starts transmitting data and everything 
works fine. 
Why does it happen? Why is it so unpredictible? Can it be fixed in software, 
or should i throw the switch out the window and by a new one?

Thanks and best regards,

m.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Routes not deleted after link down

2005-06-19 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Domingo, 19 de Junio de 2005 10:48, Michal Vanco escribi:
 On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
  J Second, you may need a route daemon for this.  ospf is a well
  known J canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a
  must.
 
  While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its
  neighbors, the kernel will still have the route installed and thus
  the box won't be able to contact other hosts on the connected net,
  while they are reachable via alternate pass.

 Routing protocol should be responsible for removing affected routes
 from FIB. For example quagga should remove all routes learned via
 particular ospf neighbour when that neighbour is not reachable
 anymore due to link goes down. But in case when no daemons are used
 (`static' and `connected' are also `routing protocols'), kernel
 should be responsible for doing that.

  I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when
  interface link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet.

 Junipers do the same. It is the only feasible behaviour for router.

  From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a
  correct behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop.

 Sure.

  My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
  switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.


I'm not sure of this.  I also think that a devd or monitor daemon will 
be enough and easy to implement.

I think NetBSD have allready some kinda of net monitor daemon for pppoe 
support (via sppp).  Not sure if route support is included.

But seems easy and clean that a kernel based solution.

--
  josemi
 Agree.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


NFS-related hang in 5.4?

2005-06-19 Thread Eirik Øverby

Hi,

when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip to a  
neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me. This  
usually happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so. Also,  
before the hang, performance is generally bad.


KDB trace:

db trace
Tracing pid 56 tid 100064 td 0xc1a18600
kdb_enter(c096bad3,4,480758,c08dcbf9,f5) at kdb_enter+0x30
siointr1(c1a8e000,c1a18600,c1a148d4,c1a12700,c1a12700) at siointr1+0xe7
siointr(c1a8e000,0,0,4,c1a18600) at siointr+0x78
intr_execute_handlers(c19bd090,d54807bc,d5480818,c08d05a3,34) at  
intr_execute_handlers+0x88

lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a
Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33
--- interrupt, eip = 0xc06b8490, esp = 0xd5480800, ebp = 0xd5480818 ---
_mtx_lock_sleep(c0a1cd2c,c1a18600,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb0
udp_input(c2d4,14,c1a99000,1,0) at udp_input+0x257
ip_input(c2d4,0,0,0,0) at ip_input+0x590
transmit_event(c1c64100,2094,0,c1d58a80,7f4220) at transmit_event 
+0x107
ready_event_wfq(c1c64100,2094,0,c1d58a80,c06d860a) at  
ready_event_wfq+0x511

dummynet_io(c2bd2e00,64,1,d54809c8,c2bd2e00) at dummynet_io+0x519
ipfw_check_out(0,d5480a24,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at ipfw_check_out+0xf1
pfil_run_hooks(c0a1c160,d5480a9c,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at  
pfil_run_hooks+0x138

ip_output(c2bd2e00,0,0,0,0) at ip_output+0x593
udp_output(c1d1821c,c2bd2e00,0,0,c1a18600) at udp_output+0x597
udp_send(c2242654,0,c1e12100,0,0) at udp_send+0x30
sosend(c2242654,0,0,c1e12100,0) at sosend+0x6f1
nfs_send(c2242654,c1d57860,c1e12100,c2313900,1c) at nfs_send+0xc9
nfs_request(c22cf108,c1e12a00,7,0,c20bb300) at nfs_request+0x342
nfs_writerpc(c22cf108,d5480ca4,c20bb300,d5480c94,d5480c98) at  
nfs_writerpc+0x2a0

nfs_doio(cbf75e08,c20bb300,0,c094f9b4,0) at nfs_doio+0x508
nfssvc_iod(c0a21828,d5480d38,0,0,0) at nfssvc_iod+0x1db
fork_exit(c07c5150,c0a21828,d5480d38) at fork_exit+0x80
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
--- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd5480d6c, ebp = 0 ---

I cannot seem to kill process 56 (nfsiod), so I have to reset the box.

Anyone got a clue? What can I do to ease debugging here? Next time it  
happens I can probably make a dump, at least I will have a debug  
kernel running then.


/Eirik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 5.3-p16/i386 unknown reason console hang

2005-06-19 Thread Juraj Lutter
On 6/14/05, Rong-En Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 Recently, one of our 5.3-p16/i386 machine got frequenctly hang. Details,
 
 1. I can switch vty, but can't login (after typing username, got hang)
 2. can response to ping, but not other tcp/udp services
 3. can break into ddb

I'm getting exactly the same behaviour on 4.11-STABLE/i386. After
typing the username on console machine hangs. It works like a charm
with previous kernel (4.8-STABLE). Upgrade was done today via usual
way (build world/kernel, install world/kernel, mergemaster, reboot
with /usr/local/etc/rc.d empty to ensure only base services to run).

otis

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Juraj Lutter
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: re0 no carrier problem - Patches found in archives didn't work.

2005-06-19 Thread Vinny Abello

At 07:09 AM 6/19/2005, Marcin Koziej wrote:



[04:12 19-06-2005] Tom Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 this may seem obvious, but do you still have the same issue if you
 statically define the mediatype to a fixed link speed and duplex?
 lots of interfaces have problems negotiating autoselect with
 switches, as protocols vary widely.  the blinking is indicative of
 autoselect setup woes...

This wasn't obvious for me! Thanks for the answer!

When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could 
be transmitted
(yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled the 
switch with my home

lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - It worked!

So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, 
that with media
set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works fine 
with this switch
(i have used it all day yesterday till evening without problem). 
Now, when i wait
some time with media manually set, it starts transmitting data and 
everything works fine.

Why does it happen? Why is it so unpredictible? Can it be fixed in software,
or should i throw the switch out the window and by a new one?


I may be replying to the wrong thread, but if I remember a previous 
post, this is for a realtek gig-e card going to a gig-e switch... 
Just another obvious point but you are using either Cat-5e or Cat-6 
cables, right? Just thought I'd offer another obvious suggestion. :)


Vinny Abello
Network Engineer
Server Management
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973)300-9211 x 125
(973)940-6125 (Direct)
PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0  E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A

Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN

Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of 
fear -- Mark Twain


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: re0 no carrier problem - Patches found in archives didn't work.

2005-06-19 Thread Julien Gabel
 this may seem obvious, but do you still have the same issue if you
 statically define the mediatype to a fixed link speed and duplex?
 lots of interfaces have problems negotiating autoselect with
 switches, as protocols vary widely.  the blinking is indicative of
 autoselect setup woes...

 When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could be
 transmitted (yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled
 the switch with my home lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead -
 It worked!

 So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, that
 with media set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works
 fine with this switch (i have used it all day yesterday till evening
 without problem). Now, when i wait some time with media manually set, it
 starts transmitting data and everything works fine.
 Why does it happen? Why is it so unpredictible? Can it be fixed in
 software, or should i throw the switch out the window and by a new one?

Not sure if it is solely switch related.  I encountered the very same
problem for months now using different links ans switches.  Moreover, it
seems to be FreeBSD specific since the same machine works better with
others OSes.

See PR kern/80005 for a more long description on a very similar problem.

-- 
-jpeg.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 5.4-p1 crash

2005-06-19 Thread Robert Watson


On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Philippe PEGON wrote:


Unfortunately this is a known bug in FreeBSD; check the archives for
more discussion.  Doug White tried to look at fixing it before
5.4-RELEASE but I think he gave up.


do you know if someone works on it ? I sent two mail in freebsd-stable 
about it without solution and this bug is really annoying :


http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2005-June/015952.html

and

http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2005-June/015864.html

there is a PR for it : kern/74319


This sounds very similar to a serial console related tty bug I was 
experiencing on -STABLE a few months ago, and that is believed may have 
been worked around in 5.4 tweaks before release.  In particular, that 
there are reference counting related bugs in the 5.x tty code that are 
fixed by a partial rewrite of the tty code in 6.x, but that are too large 
and disruptive to merge to RELENG_5.  If the problem is persisting, it may 
be worth trying to merge anyway, but it is a pretty big change and would 
break device driver binary compatibility, etc.  What we might want to do 
here is wait until 6.x has settled out a bit more, then consider merging 
it to 5.x once 6.x has gotten burned in with similar workloads and 
continued to not illustrate the 5.x tty reference bugs.


Robert N M Watson
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4?

2005-06-19 Thread Robert Watson


On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Eirik verby wrote:

when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip to a 
neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me. This usually 
happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so. Also, before the 
hang, performance is generally bad.


Hmm.  Looks like a bug in dummynet.  ipfw should not be directly 
re-injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an outbound path, 
or it risks re-entering, generating lock order problems, etc. It should be 
getting dropped into the netisr queue to be processed from the netisr 
context.


Is it possible to configure dummynet out of your configuration, and see if 
the problem goes away?


Robert N M Watson



KDB trace:

db trace
Tracing pid 56 tid 100064 td 0xc1a18600
kdb_enter(c096bad3,4,480758,c08dcbf9,f5) at kdb_enter+0x30
siointr1(c1a8e000,c1a18600,c1a148d4,c1a12700,c1a12700) at siointr1+0xe7
siointr(c1a8e000,0,0,4,c1a18600) at siointr+0x78
intr_execute_handlers(c19bd090,d54807bc,d5480818,c08d05a3,34) at 
intr_execute_handlers+0x88

lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a
Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33
--- interrupt, eip = 0xc06b8490, esp = 0xd5480800, ebp = 0xd5480818 ---
_mtx_lock_sleep(c0a1cd2c,c1a18600,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb0
udp_input(c2d4,14,c1a99000,1,0) at udp_input+0x257
ip_input(c2d4,0,0,0,0) at ip_input+0x590
transmit_event(c1c64100,2094,0,c1d58a80,7f4220) at transmit_event+0x107
ready_event_wfq(c1c64100,2094,0,c1d58a80,c06d860a) at 
ready_event_wfq+0x511

dummynet_io(c2bd2e00,64,1,d54809c8,c2bd2e00) at dummynet_io+0x519
ipfw_check_out(0,d5480a24,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at ipfw_check_out+0xf1
pfil_run_hooks(c0a1c160,d5480a9c,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at pfil_run_hooks+0x138
ip_output(c2bd2e00,0,0,0,0) at ip_output+0x593
udp_output(c1d1821c,c2bd2e00,0,0,c1a18600) at udp_output+0x597
udp_send(c2242654,0,c1e12100,0,0) at udp_send+0x30
sosend(c2242654,0,0,c1e12100,0) at sosend+0x6f1
nfs_send(c2242654,c1d57860,c1e12100,c2313900,1c) at nfs_send+0xc9
nfs_request(c22cf108,c1e12a00,7,0,c20bb300) at nfs_request+0x342
nfs_writerpc(c22cf108,d5480ca4,c20bb300,d5480c94,d5480c98) at 
nfs_writerpc+0x2a0

nfs_doio(cbf75e08,c20bb300,0,c094f9b4,0) at nfs_doio+0x508
nfssvc_iod(c0a21828,d5480d38,0,0,0) at nfssvc_iod+0x1db
fork_exit(c07c5150,c0a21828,d5480d38) at fork_exit+0x80
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
--- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd5480d6c, ebp = 0 ---

I cannot seem to kill process 56 (nfsiod), so I have to reset the box.

Anyone got a clue? What can I do to ease debugging here? Next time it happens 
I can probably make a dump, at least I will have a debug kernel running then.


/Eirik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: rebooting problem

2005-06-19 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:19:41 +0200
GMane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Cian,
 
 Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Do you also have a hanging problem if you shutdown with `shutdown -
  p now`?
 
   No, the problem it's only with the reboot command.
 
  Are you using ACPI?
  Have you ensured you are using the latest BIOS for you system?
 
I turned off the ACPI from the BIOS. (but from the dmesg it seems
 on)

You need to add a line to /boot/device.hints to disable acpi:

hint.acpi.0.disabled=1

FWIW, I've been seeing the same problem on both my 32-bit Athlon box
and on my Athlon 64, both running 5.4-STABLE.

One thing I've discovered is that the machine will reboot properly if
booted in single-user mode.  It appears to be only a problem when
shutting down from multi-user mode.  The shutdown process gets as far
as outputting the Uptime: line, and then just hangs.

-- 
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: re0 no carrier problem - Patches found in archives didn't work.

2005-06-19 Thread Mike Tancsa

At 07:09 AM 19/06/2005, Marcin Koziej wrote:

When I set the media by hand it showed 'active', but no data could be 
transmitted
(yellow link diode on switch, not blinking). I then pulled the switch with 
my home

lan from the wall and plugged my re0 instead - It worked!

So this seems to be the %$R#(@%*$ switch issue. The funny thing is, that 
with media
set manually (or sometimes with autoselect) everything works fine with 
this switch

(i have used it all day yesterday till evening without problem). Now, when i



Both sides have to agree to the setting.  ie if the switch is set to 
autoneg, your network card must also be set to autoneg and vice 
versa.Unless its a managed switch, leave the NIC as autonegotiate.  If 
its still failing, I suspect its something with the re driver.  Its 
possible the NIC and switch dont like each other (it has happened in the 
past with certain vendors) but this is pretty rare these days.


---Mike 


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Routes not deleted after link down

2005-06-19 Thread Sten Daniel Sørsdal
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
 
 My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
 switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
 
 What is opinion of other networkers?
 

How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event
and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can
benefit.
Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive
route table maybe?) and not deleted.

At my old job i came across situations where the lack of this feature
caused headaches and once or twice the loss of a customer.


-- 
Sten Daniel Srsdal
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Routes not deleted after link down

2005-06-19 Thread Mike Tancsa

At 04:29 AM 19/06/2005, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
J Second, you may need a route daemon for this.  ospf is a well known
J canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.

I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from FIB when interface
link goes down. I haven't checked Junipers yet.

From my viewpoint, removing route (or marking it unusable) is a correct
behavior for router. Not sure it is correct for desktop.

My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.


I like this idea as well, but you need to control how the routes would come 
back after the interface comes back up ?  This seems more of the province 
of a routing daemon like quagga as opposed to a kernel feature no ?


---Mike 


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!)

2005-06-19 Thread Martin
twesky wrote:
 I am having ATA_DMA errors on 5.4R and 5 STABLE up to June 16 (haven't
 done a cvsup again).  It doesn't happen on 5.3R or lower.

I have got same problem. I tried yesterday's kernel and I got lots of
ATA DMA errors. A question: do you have a VIA IDE controller like mine?

atapci0: VIA 8235 UDMA133 controller port
0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:17:1:  class=0x01018a card=0x05711849 chip=0x05711106
rev=0x06 hdr=0x00
vendor   = 'VIA Technologies Inc'
device   = 'VT82 EIDE Controller (All VIA Chipsets)'
class= mass storage
subclass = ATA

Today, I noticed, the short experiment with the latest -STABLE destroyed
a part of my /usr partition. It looked like this (with May 9th kernel
today):

kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count
kernel: bad block 50333952, ino 1743780
kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
kernel: bad block 3221252091, ino 1743780
klotz kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
kernel: bad block 144119931884736777, ino 1743780
kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
kernel: bad block 72340173158093844, ino 1743780
kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
kernel: bad block 1104111992832, ino 1743780
kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count
kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count
kernel: bad block 1865342872522620032, ino 1743783

While shutting down I got this:

Jun 19 22:04:21 klotz kernel: /usr: unmount pending error: blocks
-3561100369582 68157 files 0

I restored the fs in single-user mode. And now it runs fine with
the kernel (May 9th).

See also my earlier post.

Martin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 5.4-p1 crash

2005-06-19 Thread Philippe PEGON

Robert Watson a crit :
This sounds very similar to a serial console related tty bug I was 
experiencing on -STABLE a few months ago, and that is believed may have 
been worked around in 5.4 tweaks before release.  In particular, that 
there are reference counting related bugs in the 5.x tty code that are 
fixed by a partial rewrite of the tty code in 6.x, but that are too 
large and disruptive to merge to RELENG_5.  If the problem is 
persisting, it may be worth trying to merge anyway, but it is a pretty 
big change and would break device driver binary compatibility, etc.  
What we might want to do here is wait until 6.x has settled out a bit 
more, then consider merging it to 5.x once 6.x has gotten burned in with 
similar workloads and continued to not illustrate the 5.x tty reference 
bugs.


Thanks for your answer.
Like I said on anothers posts, we have a FreeBSD 5.4-p1 which connects every fifteen minutes with an 
expect program to a lot of network devices for retrieving some informations, it seems that it is the 
culprit, the server crashed almost everyday. We reduced the frequency to one per hour and that 
attenuates the problem.
This panic is easy to reproduce with this simple expect program (see below) by running it 6 times 
simultaneously and waiting a few hours, I tested it on a HP DL360 with 2 cpu. If that can help, I 
can test this on current next week.



#! /usr/local/bin/expect

set timeout 60
set host [lindex $argv 0]

set pass PASSWORD

spawn ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]

expect {
  continue*(yes/no) { send yes\r ; exp_continue }
  assword: { send $pass\r }
}

expect *#  {
  send ls\r
}
expect *# {
  send exit\r
}

puts Done.



Robert N M Watson


--
Philippe PEGON
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SCSI troubles

2005-06-19 Thread Tomas Randa

Hi,

I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May  8 18:23:40 CEST 
2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI 
I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody 
some opinion where could be problem?


Thanks a lot Tomas Randa

da0: SEAGATE ST336754LW 0002 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged 
Queueing Enabled


kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt)
kernel: QOUTPOS = 252
kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt)
kernel: QOUTPOS = 253
kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt)
kernel: QOUTPOS = 254
kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt)
kernel: QOUTPOS = 255
kernel: ahc0: Recovery Initiated
kernel:  Dump Card State Begins 
kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x8
kernel: Card was paused
kernel: ACCUM = 0x0, SINDEX = 0x7, DINDEX = 0xe4, ARG_2 = 0x0
kernel: HCNT = 0x0 SCBPTR = 0xa
kernel: SCSISIGI[0x0] ERROR[0x0] SCSIBUSL[0x0] LASTPHASE[0x1]:(P_BUSFREE)
kernel: SCSISEQ[0x12]:(ENAUTOATNP|ENRSELI) SBLKCTL[0xa]:(SELWIDE|SELBUSB)
kernel: SCSIRATE[0x0] SEQCTL[0x10]:(FASTMODE) 
SEQ_FLAGS[0xc0]:(NO_CDB_SENT|NOT_IDENTIFIED

kernel: SSTAT0[0x0] SSTAT1[0xa]:(PHASECHG|BUSFREE) SSTAT2[0x0]
kernel: SSTAT3[0x0] SIMODE0[0x8]:(ENSWRAP) 
SIMODE1[0xa4]:(ENSCSIPERR|ENSCSIRST|ENSELTIMO)
kernel: SXFRCTL0[0x80]:(DFON) DFCNTRL[0x0] 
DFSTATUS[0x89]:(FIFOEMP|HDONE|PRELOAD_AVAIL)

kernel: STACK: 0x0 0x167 0x10d 0x3
kernel: SCB count = 70
kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 43
kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 43
kernel: QINFIFO entries:
kernel: Waiting Queue entries:
kernel: Disconnected Queue entries:
kernel: QOUTFIFO entries:
kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 10 0 20 23 12 15 19 29 18 28 26 7 5 27 
9 17 30 1 2 16 4

kernel: Sequencer SCB Info:
kernel: 0 SCB_CONTROL[0xe0]:(TAG_ENB|DISCENB|TARGET_SCB) SCB_SCSIID[0x7]
kernel: SCB_LUN[0x0] SCB_TAG[0xff]
kernel: 1 SCB_CONTROL[0xe0]:(TAG_ENB|DISCENB|TARGET_SCB) SCB_SCSIID[0x7]
kernel: SCB_LUN[0x0] SCB_TAG[0xff]
kernel: 2 SCB_CONTROL[0xe0]:(TAG_ENB|DISCENB|TARGET_SCB) SCB_SCSIID[0x7]
kernel: SCB_LUN[0x0] SCB_TAG[0xff]


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 5.4-p1 crash

2005-06-19 Thread Doug White
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote:

 Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT and USB
 disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have the serial
 console in place for this last crash, but it is now.

As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have for
a fix is this patch:

http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff

Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or
don't :-) ).

-- 
Doug White|  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Weird fdisk behavior

2005-06-19 Thread Doug White
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Baldur Gislason wrote:

 I am trying to add another partition to my root drive, it has a few gigabytes 
 of unpartitioned space.
 Whenever I try to run fdisk -u it says cannot open disk /dev/ad0: No such 
 file or directory
 ad0 does exist, why does fdisk say otherwise? fdisk can display the partition 
 table but it can't alter it.
 securelevel is -1 and this is FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from the beginning of May 
 this year.

Be aware that fdisk will fake up a partition table if the volume has no
table. Look for a message like:

warning: invalid partition table found

If you see that then there is no FDISK partition table.

-- 
Doug White|  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Weird fdisk behavior

2005-06-19 Thread Philip Murray

Hi,

On 18/06/2005, at 1:28 PM, Baldur Gislason wrote:
I am trying to add another partition to my root drive, it has a few  
gigabytes of unpartitioned space.
Whenever I try to run fdisk -u it says cannot open disk /dev/ad0:  
No such file or directory
ad0 does exist, why does fdisk say otherwise? fdisk can display the  
partition table but it can't alter it.
securelevel is -1 and this is FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from the beginning  
of May this year.




Try setting

sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16

before running fdisk. This stops GEOM protecting the drive/partition  
and allows fdisk to open it. I think fdisk and bsdlabel have been  
taught about GEOM in 6-current, but I very might well be wrong.


Cheers
Phil Murray
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4?

2005-06-19 Thread Eirik Øverby


On 19. jun. 2005, at 20.06, Robert Watson wrote:



On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Eirik verby wrote:


when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip  
to a neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me.  
This usually happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so.  
Also, before the hang, performance is generally bad.




Hmm.  Looks like a bug in dummynet.  ipfw should not be directly re- 
injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an outbound  
path, or it risks re-entering, generating lock order problems, etc.  
It should be getting dropped into the netisr queue to be processed  
from the netisr context.


This problem would exist across all 5.4 installations, both i386 and  
amd64? Would it depend on heavy load, or could it theoretically  
happen at any time when there's traffic? All three of my fbsd5  
servers (dual opteron, dual p3-1ghz, dual p3-700mhz) are experiencing  
random hangs with ~a few weeks between, impression is that if running  
single-cpu mode they are all stable. All using dummynet in a  
comparable manner. Ideas?


Is it possible to configure dummynet out of your configuration, and  
see if the problem goes away?


I'm running a test right now, will let you know in the morning.



Robert N M Watson




KDB trace:

db trace
Tracing pid 56 tid 100064 td 0xc1a18600
kdb_enter(c096bad3,4,480758,c08dcbf9,f5) at kdb_enter+0x30
siointr1(c1a8e000,c1a18600,c1a148d4,c1a12700,c1a12700) at siointr1 
+0xe7

siointr(c1a8e000,0,0,4,c1a18600) at siointr+0x78
intr_execute_handlers(c19bd090,d54807bc,d5480818,c08d05a3,34) at  
intr_execute_handlers+0x88

lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a
Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33
--- interrupt, eip = 0xc06b8490, esp = 0xd5480800, ebp =  
0xd5480818 ---

_mtx_lock_sleep(c0a1cd2c,c1a18600,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0xb0
udp_input(c2d4,14,c1a99000,1,0) at udp_input+0x257
ip_input(c2d4,0,0,0,0) at ip_input+0x590
transmit_event(c1c64100,2094,0,c1d58a80,7f4220) at  
transmit_event+0x107
ready_event_wfq(c1c64100,2094,0,c1d58a80,c06d860a) at  
ready_event_wfq+0x511

dummynet_io(c2bd2e00,64,1,d54809c8,c2bd2e00) at dummynet_io+0x519
ipfw_check_out(0,d5480a24,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at ipfw_check_out+0xf1
pfil_run_hooks(c0a1c160,d5480a9c,c1a99000,2,c1d1821c) at  
pfil_run_hooks+0x138

ip_output(c2bd2e00,0,0,0,0) at ip_output+0x593
udp_output(c1d1821c,c2bd2e00,0,0,c1a18600) at udp_output+0x597
udp_send(c2242654,0,c1e12100,0,0) at udp_send+0x30
sosend(c2242654,0,0,c1e12100,0) at sosend+0x6f1
nfs_send(c2242654,c1d57860,c1e12100,c2313900,1c) at nfs_send+0xc9
nfs_request(c22cf108,c1e12a00,7,0,c20bb300) at nfs_request+0x342
nfs_writerpc(c22cf108,d5480ca4,c20bb300,d5480c94,d5480c98) at  
nfs_writerpc+0x2a0

nfs_doio(cbf75e08,c20bb300,0,c094f9b4,0) at nfs_doio+0x508
nfssvc_iod(c0a21828,d5480d38,0,0,0) at nfssvc_iod+0x1db
fork_exit(c07c5150,c0a21828,d5480d38) at fork_exit+0x80
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
--- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd5480d6c, ebp = 0 ---

I cannot seem to kill process 56 (nfsiod), so I have to reset the  
box.


Anyone got a clue? What can I do to ease debugging here? Next time  
it happens I can probably make a dump, at least I will have a  
debug kernel running then.


/Eirik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATA_DMA errors (and fs corruption!)

2005-06-19 Thread twesky
Here is my controller:

atapci0: Intel ICH4 UDMA100 controller port
0x1860-0x186f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on
pci0
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
ata1: channel #1 on atapci0

The last known good stable version for me was aprox April 25, my next
cvsup was May 17, but I have problems with 5.4 Release so I assume
(probably incorrectly) that something changed between April 25 and
5.4R.

I don't exactly recall my shutdown errors, but I did have to restore
my file systems to get my laptop back to a functioning state.

On 6/19/05, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 twesky wrote:
  I am having ATA_DMA errors on 5.4R and 5 STABLE up to June 16 (haven't
  done a cvsup again).  It doesn't happen on 5.3R or lower.
 
 I have got same problem. I tried yesterday's kernel and I got lots of
 ATA DMA errors. A question: do you have a VIA IDE controller like mine?
 
 atapci0: VIA 8235 UDMA133 controller port
 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:17:1:  class=0x01018a card=0x05711849 chip=0x05711106
 rev=0x06 hdr=0x00
 vendor   = 'VIA Technologies Inc'
 device   = 'VT82 EIDE Controller (All VIA Chipsets)'
 class= mass storage
 subclass = ATA
 
 Today, I noticed, the short experiment with the latest -STABLE destroyed
 a part of my /usr partition. It looked like this (with May 9th kernel
 today):
 
 kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count
 kernel: bad block 50333952, ino 1743780
 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
 kernel: bad block 3221252091, ino 1743780
 klotz kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
 kernel: bad block 144119931884736777, ino 1743780
 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
 kernel: bad block 72340173158093844, ino 1743780
 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
 kernel: bad block 1104111992832, ino 1743780
 kernel: pid 56 (syncer), uid 0 inumber 1743780 on /usr: bad block
 kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count
 kernel: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count
 kernel: bad block 1865342872522620032, ino 1743783
 
 While shutting down I got this:
 
 Jun 19 22:04:21 klotz kernel: /usr: unmount pending error: blocks
 -3561100369582 68157 files 0
 
 I restored the fs in single-user mode. And now it runs fine with
 the kernel (May 9th).
 
 See also my earlier post.
 
 Martin

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 5.4-p1 crash

2005-06-19 Thread Mitch Parks

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote:


On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote:

Below are details regarding another crash on a Dell 2600 SMP (HTT and USB
disabled). It has been 9 days since the last crash. I didn't have the serial
console in place for this last crash, but it is now.


As noted, the ttwakeup() panic is a known bug. The best thing we have for
a fix is this patch:

http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tty.t_pgrp.diff

Please give it a try and report back if you have any more panics (or
don't :-) ).


Thanks! This patch appears to be for 5.3, but I manually applied the chunk 
of the patch that didn't apply cleanly and the countdown is on.


I'll report back in 10 days unless something bad happens before then.

Below is the patch chunk #10 that I actually applied rather than the one 
given. If I've done something bad here by removing the PGRP_LOCK please let 
me know.



Hunk #6 succeeded at 1154 (offset -51 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1215 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1203 (offset -51 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1946 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #10 failed at 2562.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 2847 (offset -212 lines).
1 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to tty.c.rej


@@ -2495,19 +2511,21 @@
 * On return following a ttyprintf(), we set tp-t_rocount to 0 so
 * that pending input will be retyped on BS.
 */
+   sx_slock(proctree_lock);
if (tp-t_session == NULL) {
+   sx_sunlock(proctree_lock);
ttyprintf(tp, not a controlling terminal\n);
tp-t_rocount = 0;
return;
}
if (tp-t_pgrp == NULL) {
+   sx_sunlock(proctree_lock);
ttyprintf(tp, no foreground process group\n);
tp-t_rocount = 0;
return;
}
-   PGRP_LOCK(tp-t_pgrp);
-   if ((p = LIST_FIRST(tp-t_pgrp-pg_members)) == 0) {
-   PGRP_UNLOCK(tp-t_pgrp);
+   if ((p = LIST_FIRST(tp-t_pgrp-pg_members)) == NULL) {
+   sx_sunlock(proctree_lock);
ttyprintf(tp, empty foreground process group\n);
tp-t_rocount = 0;
return;

Or the complete patch:
http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~mitch/crash/tty_5.4.patch

Mitch Parks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ndis no longer detects netgear wg311v2

2005-06-19 Thread Evan Dower
I recently moved, and for some reason my computer started crashing
when I tried to make it associate with my new wireless network. (It
worked fine on the old wireless network.) I figured the first thing I
should do to fix the problem is update my sources, since it may have
already been fixed. Unfortunately the updated sources don't recognize
my wireless card at all.

Before the update (hand-transcribed):
# uname -a
FreeBSD lojak.washington.edu 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0:
Sat Apr  2 11:50:53 PST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM  i386
# kldload FwRad16.bin.ko
# kldload ndis
# kldload if_ndis
ndis0: NETGEAR WG311v2 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter mem 
0xfb02-0xfb03,0xfb04-0xfb041fff irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2
ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1
ndis0: Ethernet address: 00:09:5b:ba:da:ef
ndis0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps
ndis0: 11g rates:  6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps
# ifconfig ndis0
ndis0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
ether 00:09:5b:da:ef
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect
status: no carrier
ssid 
channel -1 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100
rtsthreshold 2312 protmode CTS
wepmode OFF weptxkey 1
# wicontrol ndis0 -l
0 stations:
# ifconfig ndis0 ssid The Penthouse channel 11 up
ndis0: link up
# dhclient ndis0
ndis0: link up
 I can't see the whole panic screen, but here's the bottom: 
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
boot() called on cpu#0
Uptime: 11m20s
Dumping 1023 MB


Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual address= 0x0
fault code   = supervisor read, page not present
intruction pointer   = 0x8:0x0
stack pointer= 0x10:0xe4e1fcec
frame pointer= 0x10:0xe4e1fd0c
code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
 = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process  = 5 (thread taskq)
trap number  = 12


I can work on getting the crash dump if that's useful, but the
behavior seems to have changed in the last couple of months. Now I
get:
# uname -a
FreeBSD lojak.washington.edu 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat Jun
14:20:40 PDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM  i386
# kldload FwRad16.bin.ko
# kldload ndis
warning: KLD '/boot/kernel/if_ndis.ko' is newer than the linker.hints
file
# kldload if_ndis
kldload: can't load if_ndis: File exists
# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
 1   10 0xc040 4a42f0   kernel
 2   14 0xc08a5000 56270acpi.ko
 31 0xc2e83000 14000FwRad16.bin.ko
 41 0xc2e97000 9000 if_ndis.ko
 51 0xc2ea 12000ndis.ko
 61 0xc2ec5000 b000 pccard.ko
# ifconfig ndis0
ifconfig: interface ndis0 does not exist
# kldunload if_ndis
# kldload if_ndis
# ifconfig ndis0
ifconfig: interface ndis0 does not exist


I haven't seen anything in UPDATING that accounts for this. Does
anyone have any idea of where to look for clues?

Thanks very much,
-- 
Evan Dower
Software Development Engineer
Amazon.com, Inc.
Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9  5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SCSI troubles

2005-06-19 Thread Bruce Burden
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:10:27AM +0200, Tomas Randa wrote:
 
 I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May  8 18:23:40 CEST 
 2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI 
 I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody 
 some opinion where could be problem?
 
 kernel: ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 0 (cmdcmplt)
 kernel: QOUTPOS = 252

Why are you using ahc() rather than ahd()? Have you tried
   the ahd() driver previously?

What do you consider heavy load? I have nad no problems
   with the ahd() and a 29320.

Bruce
-- 

  I like bad! Bruce BurdenAustin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]