My bad. Please accept my apologies. Working on too many things at one time.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Garrett Anderson wrote:
> I am working on the Jerome's computer. What you want is still on the
> server in Moscow. Yes, there is a copy on the Jerome's computer but
> it is password protected. What is the password? I don't know but it
> is the same one that is used to access the Exchange server in Moscow.
> So, we come back to the same bottleneck: Access to the Exchange Server
> in Moscow.
>
> The best thing to do is to get access to Jerome's "current" email on
> the server in Moscow. The alternative is to get this password and I
> setup TeamViewer on the Jerome's computer and you access his computer
> from London (via TeamViewer). In either case, we need Jerome's
> Outlook Password and that can only be reset in Moscow.
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 16, 2012 3:59:09 am Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>>>>>> Just update my 8.x kernel sources last weekend, and newly built kernel
>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>> not boot for me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> link_elf: symbol mem_range_softc undefined
>>>>>>> KLD file acpi.ko - could not finalize loading
>>>>>>> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try to add 'device mem' to your kernel configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I explicitly have "nodevice mem" and "nodevice io" in my config. They are
>>>>> being loaded from /boot/loader.conf. This worked fine for quite a while.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will try to have it compiled-in, but would still prefer it fixed, or in
>>>>> case it cannot be fixed and mem.ko cannot be loaded separately from now
>>>>> on,
>>>>> appropriate entry in UPDATING.
>>>>
>>>> It seems John Baldwin brought dependency of acpi.ko on device mem
>>>> 4 days ago to RELENG_8 with MFC:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/i386/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c#rev1.50.2.3
>>>
>>> Hmm, this has been broken for a long time on HEAD and 9 it seems. However,
>>> there
>>> you get compile breakage (as acpi is no longer supported as a module in 9+)
>>> if you
>>> try to build a kernel with 'nodevice mem'.
>>>
>>> Hmm, mp_machdep.c also breaks. That is probably true on i386 as well, and
>>> has
>>> been true even on 7.x. (That is, you can't use 'nodevice mem' and 'SMP' in
>>> the
>>> same kernel.)
>>>
>>> The simplest fix is to just move mem_range_softc out of mem.ko into the
>>> base kernel.
>>>
>>> OTOH, what are you trying to gain by putting mem.ko into a module rather
>>> than part of
>>> the base kernel? Do you just want no /dev/mem file or are you trying to
>>> disable all
>>> of the MTRR support as well? It may be that we need to rethink what goes
>>> into mem.ko
>>> and have it only exclude /dev/mem but always leave MTRR support enabled.
>>
>> I guess, Alexey just tries to make smallest possible kernel just for fun :-)
>> Or, for PicoBSD case where kernel should be booted from very small media and
>> modules from another one.
>>
>> Eugene Grosbein
>> ___
>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"