Re: cvsup-16-f issue
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:29:10PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > Andrew McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > > > Is there a package for cvsup that doesn't require X ? > > > I know that we have the -g key, still the new version has a feature?: > > > on a fresh installation of 4.4 STABLE it gives me only cvsup-16-f > > > package which complaines thusly: > > > > > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libXaw.so.6" not found > > > > If you have the ports system installed: > > > > # cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup/ > > # make -DWITHOUT_X11 && make install > > > > Bear in mind that CVSup is written in Modula 3 and will, thus, require > > this to be installed. > > Which is why you really want to do: > > # make -DSTATIC -DWITHOUT_X11 && make install > > which will link all the Modula 3 libraries in statically, so you can > then deinstall all of Modula 3 without breaking the thing. STATIC is > turned on by defualt when making the package, but not when just > building the port. This used to be true, but is not true for the latest port which uses a different Modula 3 compiler. Nowadays the Modula 3 libraries are always linked in statically and both package and port are by default linked dynamically with the system libraries. (This is what has caused the problems, since the X libraries are linked in dynamically in the package, instead of statically as before.) -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: cvsup-16-f issue
Andrew, thank you very much for your no_X build. It works fine here. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: RE: cvsup-16-f issue
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote: > > I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a > > cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will > > run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version > > won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly > > reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't > > have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO. > > IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in the Makefile >because the default behaviour would run on systems with an without X11. Since I only >run boxes without X11 it would > conveniently make my life easier too But thats another story :) And to add to that, if I install a new system, the first thing I would like to do on it, is to run cvsup on both /usr/src and /usr/ports before I install anything more (include X). > > +-+ > | Thomas Gravgaard | "The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) | > | Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) | > | Infopaq ApS| Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple\/ \ ^| > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | competition." Black Adder .\._/_)| > +-+ > |FC København. Danske mestre 2000/2001! | > +-+ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \<,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: cvsup-16-f issue
At 03:13 PM 1/11/2002 +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote: >I do see your point... It is not good having to install that darn M3 compiler This was the idea of the cvsup-bin port, which looks not to be maintained any longer... ? >+-+ >| Thomas Gravgaard | "The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) | >| Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) | >| Infopaq ApS| Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple\/ \ ^| >| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | competition." Black Adder .\._/_)| >+-+ >|FC København. Danske mestre 2000/2001! | >+-+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: cvsup-16-f issue
> I happen to think that cvsup is one program that should be added as a > package. You reduce the side effects introduced by having one port > that needs a modula compiler. The s1g site has both versions and you > download your choice. I do see your point... It is not good having to install that darn M3 compiler when CVSUP is the only ports needing it. I have just attuned myself to using ports, and it is with ports (and portupgrade) I run my updating routines. But I could make an exception with CVSUP... +-+ | Thomas Gravgaard | "The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) | | Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) | | Infopaq ApS| Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple\/ \ ^| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | competition." Black Adder .\._/_)| +-+ |FC København. Danske mestre 2000/2001! | +-+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: cvsup-16-f issue
Thomas Gravgaard wrote: >>I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a >>cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will >>run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version >>won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly >>reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't >>have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO. >> > > IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in the Makefile >because the default behaviour would run on systems with an without X11. Since I only >run boxes without X11 it would > conveniently make my life easier too But thats another story :) I happen to think that cvsup is one program that should be added as a package. You reduce the side effects introduced by having one port that needs a modula compiler. The s1g site has both versions and you download your choice. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
