Re: docker info?
On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: On 2015-07-28 20:44, Michael Dexter wrote: On 7/28/15 1:17 PM, Kegan Myers wrote: Make sure you have permissions. Docker isn't good at figuring out that you need sudo or other permissions to talk to the socket. Also, do make sure you are using a recent version of 11 CURRENT or a 10.2 BETA/RC. I do not know what errors will be thrown by older versions of FreeBSD with Linux images, though they will support FreeBSD images with some risk of ABI mismatch. Michael ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I'm running absolutely top of tree. borg.lerctr.org /home/ler $ sudo -s Password: borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # docker info Get http:///var/run/docker.sock/v1.19/info: EOF. Are you trying to connect to a TLS-enabled daemon without TLS? borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # ps auxw|grep docker root867 0.0 0.0 14412 2220 - Is 16:48 0:00.00 daemon: /usr/local/bin/docker[868] (daemon) root868 0.0 0.0 38628 16116 - S16:48 0:12.21 /usr/local/bin/docker -d -e jail -s zfs -g /usr/docker -D root 3544 0.0 0.0 18772 2548 0 S+ 20:54 0:00.00 grep docker borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # uname -aKU FreeBSD borg.lerctr.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #29 r285983: Tue Jul 28 16:15:05 CDT 2015 r...@borg.lerctr.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VT-LER amd64 1100077 1100077 borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # pkg info docker-freebsd docker-freebsd-20150625 Name : docker-freebsd Version: 20150625 Installed on : Wed Jul 22 11:17:21 CDT 2015 Origin : sysutils/docker-freebsd Architecture : freebsd:11:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : sysutils Licenses : APACHE20 Maintainer : kmo...@freebsd.org WWW: https://github.com/kvasdopil/docker Comment: Docker containment system Annotations: Flat size : 11.5MiB Description: Docker is an open source project to pack, ship and run any application as a lightweight container. Docker containers are both hardware-agnostic and platform-agnostic. This means they can run anywhere, from your laptop to the largest EC2 compute instance and everything in between - and they don't require you to use a particular language, framework or packaging system. That makes them great building blocks for deploying and scaling web apps, databases, and backend services without depending on a particular stack or provider. WWW: https://github.com/kvasdopil/docker borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # — ~20% of a few customers containers have had issues - from stability to performance to bizarre behavior - but most of it is rather new stuff based off CoreOS, Ubuntu 15.x, Debian 8.1, etc. - with CoreOS showing issue the most often. These all have VERY recent kernels, so it’s likely missing ABI functionality in the emulation layer. With that said - I’ve found that Ubuntu 12/14 LTS and Centos/RHEL 6.x containers work great. Most Centos 7 ones we’ve tested also seem to be okay - though later 7/7.1 have show high cpu usage and erratic network performance. Once I have time, I might delve deeper into it - though it’s not a huge priority at the moment. Hopefully that was useful in some capacity. best, -bp @creepingfur You shouldn’t let poets lie to you. - Bjork ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bhyvecon2015 videos?
On May 20, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Michael Dexter edi...@callfortesting.org wrote: On 5/20/15 12:24 PM, Joseph Mulloy wrote: Are there videos of the talks given at bhyvecon2015? I've been looking for them on YouTube and I haven't been able to find them. Specifically I'm looking for the video of Peter Grehan's What's new in bhyve talk and Allan Jude's Introduction to bhyveucl. I know the AsiaBSDCon organizers streamed the event and trust it would be with their other conference content. I will investigate. The AsiaBSDcon 2014 presentations didn’t show up in video form until Dec 2014. Perhaps this year they’ll show up soon this time around, but none are currently posted. -bp ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bhyve cannot allocate memory
Digging thru my system - I have (2) stock FreeBSD system (HP DL385s) at r274859 - bhyve seems to be working fine for FreeBSD and Linux guests. r274900 also appears to be good. I know it’s not a ton of help of resolving the issue cheers, -bp On Nov 22, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 22, 2014 10:15 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi Shawn, Forgot to mention, I'm on r274859. I have a working system at r274783. A quick glance doesn't show anything obvious that may cause a regression, but I'm rebuilding now and will give it a try. Is your system stock FreeBSD or HardenedBSD ? It's hardenedBSD. I'll try a stock build tomorrow. The only change we have that could affect bhyve is the removal of map_at_zero. I've disabled all our other hardening features. ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No bhyve guests can reach the network after update.
Thank you! I feel like an idiot now.. it seems I did indeed somehow/accidently mergemastered out my usual sysctl.conf for the stock one. I should have checked that first. Setting sysctl net.link.tap.up_on_open=1 seems to have done it. sorry for the noise.. cheers, -bp On Oct 26, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2014-10-26 18:36, Benjamin Perrault wrote: Hi all, So I just update one of my systems to 10-STABLE r273710 ( GENERIC kernel config ) and now all the bhyve guests are unable to connect to the network ( be it linux, freebsd, or openbsd ). They guests see their network interfaces fine - but they are unable to connect to anything. Additionally on the host, the tap interfaces appear to be connecting just fine. Everything appears fine on the host and it’s reporting no errors. The networking is working/performing as normal. There has been no configuration changes. Here is the relevant networks stuff ( that’s been working reliably since 10-RELEASE, and is running fine on 10.1-RC2 and -current just fine. ). = ifconfig_em0=up -txcsum” ifconfig_igb0=up -txcsum” defaultrouter=“10.0.x.x cloned_interfaces=lagg0 bridge0 tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3 tap4 tap5 tap6 tap7 tap8 tap9” ifconfig_lagg0=laggproto lacp laggport em0 laggport igb0 10.0.x.x/24” ifconfig_bridge0=addm lagg0 addm tap0 addm tap1 addm tap2 addm tap3 addm tap4 addm tap5 addm tap6 addm tap7 addm tap8 addm tap9” == Any one have any ideas or suggestions? I always get spooked/bothered when something that was working fine just sort of breaks.. cheers and thanks, -bp ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org try: ifconfig bridge0 up and make sure your tap interfaces are up as well (sysctl net.link.tap.up_on_open=1 is useful) -- Allan Jude ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new issues or unknowns what so ever. Everything that worked before still works now ( and a few bugs from fixed from HEAD ). Thus, I have gone ahead and pushed r273182 w/ Neel’s patch out to about 80 of the assorted AMD boxes in the production and dev pods that I care for. If end users see something, I’ll let you know, but I have a feeling they won’t. Again - Excellent work. cheers, -bp On Oct 19, 2014, at 5:03 AM, Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl wrote: On 16-10-2014 5:00, Anish Gupta wrote: Hi all, The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD processor since 2010 will have the features required by bhyve. bhyve on AMD supports (almost) all the features available with Intel [2]. All guest OSes supported on Intel are supported on AMD. All the bhyve-related utilities function similarly on both Intel and AMD platforms [3]. The patch against HEAD revision 273066 is available for review and testing: https://people.freebsd.org/~neel/bhyve/bhyve_svm.diff [Neel’s web directory] [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_virtualization [2]: bhyve doesn't support PCI passthru on AMD at this time [3]: bhyvectl has grown some processor-specific options Fetched the patch and compiled. Now running: HEAD r273066M and I was able to throw at it all the tests and images that in the past works. And perhaps even better. Great work. --WjW ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
